share price breakout (1462) +0.05
-0.80 [social_text] “Spacex is fine on its own. Merger talk is driven by Tesla bros looking for a bailout because their stock has been flat for 5 years.” — The author explicitly opposes a Tesla–SpaceX merger and attributes the idea to Tesla's financial distress.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Filtronic secures a $68.1m order with SpaceX” — The secured order is a positive business contract for Filtronic.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “China Merger Hurdles” — The item identifies regulatory obstacles to a China merger as a negative proposition for SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “$SPCX & $TSLA will never merge.” — The post asserts that a merger between SPCX and Tesla is not feasible.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Lutnick really needs to be fired and thrown in jail already...” — The post expresses a strongly negative attributed opinion about a named individual.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Trump's SEC is going after these Dirtbags” — The attributed SEC action against DJT/SPCX is presented as a negative regulatory enforcement risk.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “With SpaceX already fully booked, many countries looking for launch capacity may have limited options” — Full booking and constrained alternatives indicate strong demand for SpaceX launch capacity.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Data centers in space. SpaceX will do it first” — SpaceX's stated intent to deploy orbital data centers first suggests a potential expansion opportunity.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “this twit is a parody of himself. What an embarassment” — The item presents a strongly negative attributed opinion about SPCX's public communication.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “AI compute leasing becomes the biggest near-term revenue driver, rising from about 35 percent of sales this year to roughly 60 percent in 2027.” — The thesis identifies a major, near-term revenue expansion driven by AI compute leasing.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$NOK and Iceye are creating competitor to $SPCX” — A stated competitive threat to SPCX's satellite business is negative.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “He wanted to be able to delay everyone's connection to track them and sell their data.” — The attributed motive alleges deceptive tracking and data selling, a strongly negative company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Traders have no patience.” — The item offers a neutral observation about trader behavior without a scorable proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Alignment Engine secured $1.17B–$1.2B in AI orders.” — The disclosed AI order range is a strong positive business proposition for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “300GW of ai compute by next year” — The item presents a very large near-term AI compute capacity target as an impressive proposition.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “data centers in space is brilliant idea” — The item offers a strongly positive attributed opinion on SPCX's data-center strategy.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Need a big gap up some time next week.” — The post expresses a bullish expectation of a near-term upward gap.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “$SPCX great landing and dumbass retailers selling under fear of failure. This thing will fly without you.” — The post expresses a strongly bullish opinion on SPCX's prospects and dismisses the selling as fear-driven.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “time for buying calls” — The post is an explicitly bullish social opinion calling for long positions in SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$SPCX bearish” — The post expresses a bearish opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “this shit is about to squeeeeeze so hard” — The post expresses a strongly bullish expectation of a sharp price move for SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “ugly trading pos.” — The user characterizes SPCX's trading position as poor.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “LT bullish.” — The author expresses a bullish long-term opinion on SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “$SPCX f scam” — The post asserts a strong fraud allegation against SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$SPCX buy at 155…??” — The question proposes a bullish buy thesis at a specific price.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX manipulated pig” — The post asserts manipulation of SPCX, a strongly negative attributed allegation.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “did some negative news come out?” — The post speculates that negative news emerged, but offers no substantiated company-specific evidence.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “the most powerful company on earth…. Shouldn’t have a red day for the next year or two or more…” — The post expresses an extremely bullish attributed opinion about SPCX's future performance.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX buy all dips” — The post is an explicit bullish investment opinion urging purchases on dips.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “1.2 million shares the shorts can’t USE” — The item advances a bullish thesis that a large share count is unavailable to short sellers.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “$GOOG asking for that discount” — The attributed thesis characterizes Google's valuation as requiring a discount.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “The squeeze will come” — The post expresses a forward-looking bullish expectation of a short squeeze in SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “I don’t understand the fear of AI.” — The author expresses skepticism toward the stated fear of AI, which is a negative attributed opinion on AI risk.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “trying to confirm the reversal pattern / bouncing off the 50 SMA and lower Bollinger band” — The item describes a technical pattern and a key level to watch, which is a price-based observation rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Oct fat dilution and unlocks going to take over discussion board soon” — The post warns that substantial dilution and unlock events will materially affect SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “certified manipulated by mms and shorts trading scam.” — The post makes a strongly negative, attributed allegation of manipulation and a trading scam against SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “this’s the purest play” — The author presents a strong bullish attributed opinion on SPCX as the purest AI investment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX quadrillion market cap wen” — The item is a bare, nonsensical market-cap claim with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX will have acquired tsla within a few qtrs I fully expect a lot of fake reporting from elmo that will get buried once absorbed by spcx and used to justify $2T evaluation” — The attributed thesis predicts deceptive reporting and manipulation to justify a valuation in the proposed acquisition.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “The SEC definitely hung out.” — The post characterizes the SEC as having avoided enforcement against SPCX, implying a low regulatory risk.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX $SNDK $MU $DRAM $NVDA OMG! Dystopia has arrived! Human vs Robot cage fights!!!” — The item is a generic, sensationalized market-wide theme that does not state a substantive proposition about SPcx.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “crimibal fkg scambags” — The post asserts criminal behavior and fraud against SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “even if only 10% of that number utilizes webull via x the numbers will be astronomical in 6 months” — The attributed user forecast is an explicitly bullish adoption projection.
stocktwits
-0.90 [social_text] “$SPCX manipulated trading scam. Criminal fraud” — The post makes a severe, unqualified allegation of criminal manipulation against SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “$SPCX has a 433% probability of capturing all of it” — The attributed probability of capturing a massive mineral deposit is an extremely positive forward proposition.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “the new government will keep letting elon provide cheap compute with illegal unpermitted methane turbines” — The user's attributed view that the government will permit unpermitted methane turbines presents a negative regulatory risk for SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “he killed $SPCX just to bail out his buddies from the stupid ass Twitter deal” — The attributed claim describes management action as hostile and self-serving, a strongly negative company-specific opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “this is so undervalued” — The post asserts that SPCX is substantially undervalued.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Huge bear trap in place.” — The post asserts a bearish market-trap thesis about SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “what the market makers allowed with Spcx was criminal behavior” — The post makes a strongly negative attributed allegation that market makers engaged in criminal behavior regarding SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “last-mile delivery needs too many drones over too many houses.” — The attributed view questions the viability of last-mile drone delivery as a scalable opportunity.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX f short scambags” — The attributed short thesis characterizes SPCX as a scam, presenting a strongly negative company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [news] “Shares of Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (NASDAQ: SPCX) are edging higher Thursday morning.”
— The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.What's Going On With SpaceX Stock Thursday? +0.00 [social_text] “Bitcoin just broke past previous resistance at 12AM EST” — Bitcoin's resistance break is a price observation and not a scorable company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “You must have written one too many zeros.” — The item is a price-related joke that offers no substantive fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “No clue about how stock prices affect valuations which will unavoidably have to match reality at some point.” — The attributed view warns that current valuations are detached from reality and will eventually correct.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “(SPCX) UNDER $150” — The item reports a share-price level without a substantive fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$152 tomorrow!!!” — This is an ungrounded price prediction with no stated fundamental or attributed-opinion basis.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “DAL Stock In Focus: Musk-Bastian Feud Over Starlink Escalates As United, American Court Delta Flyers” — The item is a market-wide roundup that only mentions SPCX as an incidental ticker without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$200” — The item reports only a share price level without any company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$TSLA $SPCX Ready for what?” — The item is a bare question about Tesla and SPCX with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Musk Teases ‘Big Deal’ Nvidia AI Milestone” — The Nvidia AI milestone is not a company-specific proposition for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$TSLA We’re ready Mr. Musk… 📈🚀🚀🚀 $SPCX” — The item is only a bare Tesla mention with no substantive proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX hits the trifecta on nasa anniversary date....lets go!!!! What a show!” — The item is celebratory but does not state a substantive fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX whales ahead” — The item is a price-related observation with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX whooooo just saw that live!?!?!” — The item is only an excited reaction to a live price move, which is a neutral observation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX INCREDIBLE” — The item is a bare, positive exclamation about SPCX without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX” — The item mentions SPCX only as part of a generic list of tickers without any company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX $RKLB $TSLA” — The item mentions SPCX only as part of a bare ticker list without any substantive proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “running a bus schedule today” — The post describes SpaceX's routine operational activity without a directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Are these levels good to enter?” — The post asks about entry levels but states no directional opinion on SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “One of my favorites!” — The user's favorable endorsement expresses a positive attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX fair price short term $250.00” — The stated fair price is a forward-looking valuation opinion, but the item provides no directional assessment of whether that target is above or below the current price.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$BTC.X 293.14 units hold $RUM are you ready for traveling $SPCX” — The post is a bare, non-substantive mention of SPCX without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Struggling short loves failing LULU stock but thinks the biggest tech boom (AI) that is in its infancy state is crumbling.” — The item is a general commentary on short positions and AI that does not present a substantive sentiment proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Spacex has the best engineers in the world” — The attributed opinion that SpaceX's engineering is the best in the world is a strong positive fundamental assessment.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “another winning the war today” — The user's attributed thesis is a positive forward opinion about SPCX's competitive outcome.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA had a market cap of 6B not 2T” — The item's only company-specific proposition is a neutral market-cap comparison that does not bear a directional sentiment on SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “MY #1 YOLO STOCK?” — The item is a promotional call to join a community rather than a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX
$1000
WORTH” — The item reports a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Thank you for flying SpaceX” — The post is a generic, non-operational reaction to SpaceX that does not advance a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “what his companies are doing is nothing short of extraordinary” — The attributed opinion characterizes Musk's companies' performance as extraordinary.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “How do those three launches warrant an increase of over $660 billion to the valuation, which currently sits at $2 trillion?” — The author questions whether the stated launches justify the reported valuation increase.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX exit liquidity” — The item reports a price-related liquidity observation without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “What was the all time high here?” — The item only asks about a historical share-price high, which is a price observation and not scorable sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Accumulating dips here it will payy” — The post presents an attributed bullish accumulation thesis for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the 200 level will get tested this year” — The item is a price-level observation with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX coming soon 148 146” — The item reports only a price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX let’s go!!!!!” — The item is only an enthusiastic reaction to SPCX without any stated fundamental reason or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Looking for a great weekend. Starts here.” — The post expresses a neutral sentiment about the weekend rather than a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPY Weak jobs → yields drop → market rips higher.” — The item describes a market-wide move and technical setup without a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Today will hit the 160$!!!!” — The item is a price prediction and does not state a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX let’s gooooo!” — This is an enthusiastic but directionless social post that does not state a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “after $SPCX buys tsla, they can easily hide any fakeass delivery #s they said to close the gap to $650 share price and $2T valuation” — The attributed thesis claims the acquisition would enable Tesla to conceal delivery figures to support an inflated valuation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “definitely paying attention here” — The post states that investors are paying attention to SPCX but offers no directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “You did your D&D, so have confidence.” — The author's advice to maintain confidence after due diligence is a positive attributed investment opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “that’s a weird way to ignore the pedophilia” — The post asserts a serious, company-linked allegation of child sexual abuse.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “when $SPCX offers 650 a share buyout” — The proposed per-share buyout price is presented as a favorable valuation for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “slightly up pre market to dump hard right at the open” — The item describes only a reported pre-market and opening price move, which is neutral under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “must be alot for mc in the trillions right?” — The item is a speculative question about SPCX's market capitalization without any stated company-specific evidence.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “WTI below $90 a barrel” — The item reports a market-wide oil price level without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Unlocks are already priced in and insiders arent selling.” — The author's attributed thesis combines a bullish valuation view with a favorable insider-sell-off observation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the train leaving” — The item is a price-blind reference to a prior price move without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Created a world record” — The record is presented as a strong positive performance achievement.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX won't cross 157 $ & if it crosses then it wont cross 158$” — The item is a price-level prediction with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Trade what you see not what you think.” — The item offers general trading advice without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Time to go down.” — The item is a price-direction prediction without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “$SPCX loaded up on puts” — Buying puts is a bearish option position on SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX stock just moves like walmart or amazon lol” — The item is only a comparison of SPCX's price movement; no fundamental or attributed opinion is stated.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “all these clowns always seem to forget how many average Americans have benefited from our amazing country and those same 401k's he is talking about” — The post expresses a strongly negative opinion about the speaker's view of the company's messaging and its perceived disconnect from average investors.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX how high can it go, 180?” — The post is a price-blind speculative question about SPcx's share price rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Should surpass $NVDA soon!” — The post asserts a bullish forward comparison between SPCX and NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “how powerful space x is and what’s in store for the future” — The author's forward-looking assertion that SpaceX is powerful and has significant future potential is a bullish attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX I really have to stop soon, don't I?” — The post is a self-directed remark that does not provide a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX green days are 5-6% on average.” — The item reports average share-price movement without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “OVER 200” — The item reports only a share-price level without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “green candle taking off” — The item describes only a bullish price pattern without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “They deployed 27 satellites with wingspans of a 737 into orbit and then Uber’d 4 people to the ISS in the same week.” — The item presents a highly ambitious operational achievement as evidence of execution capability.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “closed out CC 155 at .26 this morning” — The post reports a completed trade without a substantive company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “$150 close pump and dump scam” — The post alleges a fraudulent pump-and-dump scheme centered on SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “In a Tesla Semi Factory” — The item mentions a Tesla facility but provides no company-specific sentiment or directional proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX on to $160” — The item reports only a price target observation without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “What a day.” — The item is only a price-day observation with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX out for now!” — The item reports a price movement without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “create Tesla into a 8 Trillion dollar company” — The post expresses a bullish view that Tesla could reach an extremely high valuation and that earnings discussion could drive further upside.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “heres-how-fast-spacex-must-grow-to-be-a-5-trillion/” — The linked article presents a forward growth-rate thesis about SpaceX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX next leg up” — The item is a price-only bullish prediction with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “SpaceX, AI Weigh On Telecom Valuations, Scotiabank Says — Cuts Targets Across Major US Communication Names” — Scotiabank's valuation thesis and target cuts are a negative attributed opinion on telecom companies including SpaceX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$SPCX next leg down incoming” — The post expresses a bullish social opinion that further downside is approaching.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Going to see another Breakout at the 158 double top C&H!!!” — The item describes a technical price pattern and expected breakout, which is a price-based observation rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX close above $155” — The item reports only a price level observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Bull flag!” — The item identifies a bullish technical pattern for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “my short is printing” — The item reports only the performance of a short position, which is a price observation and not a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “puts” — The item mentions put options but provides no directional thesis about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX out of steam” — The item reports share momentum without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX let’s go” — The post is a bare bullish cheer that does not state a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX needs to break $158 to head back to $170” — The item is a price-blind technical observation about SPX's level and target, not a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX heading towards 152” — The item reports only a prospective share-price level without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “ur an Iranian or something?” — The post's hostile tone is used to dismiss bearish posts about SPCX, indicating negative sentiment toward the company.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Musk being part of trumps govt again should scare people!” — The attributed fear identifies a material political/regulatory risk to the company.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX IS UP 5.9%” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX https://www.tipranks.com/stocks/spcx/forecast” — The post is a bare mention of SPCX with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “no chance no profit literally zero track record 2T and going up” — The user's explicit thesis that the company has no profitable track record is a strongly negative attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 6% ???” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “poor lil bears....falling for every trap...” — The post expresses a bullish social opinion that bears are trapped by SPcx's moves.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$spY crashing” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable company-specific reason.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “over priced co” — The attributed opinion states the company is overvalued.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “profited longs not transitioning to shorts” — The user's observation that long positions are profitable and not converting to shorts indicates bullish sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “245% GAINER!” — The item reports only a historical share-price move, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Before $SPCX had its first successful rocket landing & reuse, who else was even capable? Nobody.” — The item presents SPCX's first successful landing and reuse as a unique capability milestone.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Dumping” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable underlying reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this was over valued” — The attributed valuation opinion is explicitly negative, but the item offers no supporting evidence and is not substantively about SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “This is how bad the scam is over on Martyn Lucas. This is the scammer they placed there vocal fossa.” — The post makes a strongly negative, unattributed allegation of fraud and deception against Martyn Lucas.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “We should pull back to that green ( was red when below it) and retest.” — The item describes a technical price pattern without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.90 [social_text] “This’s a scam stock people!” — The post makes an explicitly negative attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 170 in a week” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “next drop incoming” — The item is a price prediction without a stated fundamental or attributed opinion to score.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 3 time rejected” — The item reports a technical price pattern without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX powering up for the afternoon run...” — The item reports only a price-momentum observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Now heavy long $SPCX too.” — The post's bullish stance is explicitly about Tesla, not SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX REJECTED” — The item reports only a price rejection without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX order in at $153.65” — The item reports only a share-price observation with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX sold shares, covered calls, 4 hour RSI into overbought territory, trippled topped and oil and yields creeping back up” — The item reports technical and market observations without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$800 incoming” — The item is a price target expectation, but the only substantive content is a reported share-price move, which is neutral.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “220 by eom?” — The post proposes a specific end-of-month share-price target for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Feeling very solid about this investment for the foreseeable future.” — The investor expresses a strongly positive forward-looking opinion about the investment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$DJT $SPCX $SPY $TSLA” — The item is a price-blind market roundup that does not state a substantive proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX $200+ 4-6 weeks.” — The item gives an explicit bullish price target and time horizon for SpaceX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this one has turned skepticism into momentum.” — The item reports share-price momentum without a stated fundamental reason, so it is explicitly neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX getting frisky…” — The item is a price-related observation with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX paradigm shift” — The item is only a bare, unsubstantiated reference to SPCX without a scorable company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Should finish under 155 today” — The item is a price prediction and contains no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “a successful Starship launch” — A successful launch is a positive operational catalyst for SpaceX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “it’s at 160” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “Elon musk companies only survive on welfare. Joke of a stock” — The post expresses a strongly negative attributed opinion about the company's viability and business model.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Market is dumping again” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable company fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 158 close” — The item reports only a closing price level for SPCX, which is a neutral observation.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “SpaceX launched five missions in the last six days.” — Five missions in six days indicates a high launch cadence, a positive operational proposition for SpaceX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The overall market is starting to take profit and ready for the weekend.” — This is a general market observation that does not bear a substantive directional sentiment on SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX dropping” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “why we rise,?” — The item is only a rhetorical question about share movement, which is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “Elon Musk says Delta CEO “will lose his job” after Delta rejected Starlink in-flight Wi-Fi in favor of Amazon’s Leo service.” — The attributed threat against Delta's CEO reflects a strongly negative opinion on Delta's strategic choice.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “what could they possibly say to justify their market cap” — The post questions whether SPCX can justify its market capitalization, expressing skepticism about the valuation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Breakout watch over 158.13” — The item is only a technical observation of a potential price breakout, which is neutral under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “shorts will be completely fked in the next 4 weeks” — The post expresses a strongly bullish attributed expectation of a short squeeze for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “riding on $SPCX momentum” — The post questions whether SPCX's move is a bottom or momentum-driven, which is a price observation without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “that changes the setup” — The item describes a technical price setup without stating a directional fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Profits will be taken….” — The item reports a price move without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “We briefly tested it and got rejected back into the $157S.” — The item describes a price-level test and rejection without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX adding heavy 🥂” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I see Green forming around the SpaceX column in my portfolio” — The item reports a portfolio-level observation without a substantive SpaceX proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “What's a Microsoft a.i deal worth . Stick around find out.” — The item mentions a Microsoft AI deal but provides no company-specific valuation or directional proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Do not fucking drop.” — This is a strongly worded but directionally neutral observation of share-price movement.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX 200 possible next week” — The user's prediction of a specific near-term price target is a bullish attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Dumping” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable underlying reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “There was a huge amount of supply to get through from 150-158.” — The item describes supply resistance and potential upside as a price-level observation, not a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “take some profit” — The post is a price-blind observation of a profit-taking move rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “nice and clean move” — The item describes SPX's share-price movement without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$180 tomorrow” — The item is a price prediction with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX no short today??” — The question is a speculative inquiry about short interest rather than a stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX bears losing it all today” — The item is a price-focused observation with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 🙌” — The post is a bare celebratory mention of SPCX without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX Rejection” — The item reports a price-level observation without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 3rd goal reached today” — The item reports a share-price milestone without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX sold too early” — The item is a neutral observation about trading timing without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$170 AH’s” — The item reports only a share-price high, which is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “loving it!” — The user's enthusiastic statement expresses positive sentiment toward the company.
stocktwits
+0.00 [news] “With its post-IPO consolidation behind it”
— The item states a completed consolidation fact without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.SpaceX (SPCX): Fresh Catalysts Ahead +0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX by the end of 2026” — The post states a target date but provides no directional forecast or supporting evidence.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the buyers seem unusually committed here” — The attributed buyer commitment describes a price reaction rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “The hardest purchases to make usually work the best.” — The post expresses a positive attributed investment thesis about difficult purchases performing well.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$1.94 on $SPCX here!” — The reported share price is a price observation and carries no directional sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Will be 3 trillion MC IN 2027.” — The item presents an extremely bullish forward market-cap forecast for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX and $RKLB outperformed $VOYG today.” — The item reports relative share-price performance, which is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “fuck Elon” — The post expresses strong negative sentiment toward Elon Musk, who is the founder and CEO of SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Almost 160$ as i said earlier today.” — The item reports a share-price level without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “EASY 200 BY NEXT FRIDAY” — The post asserts a specific bullish price target for SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “$SPCX wrong.” — The post expresses a negative attributed opinion about the company.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Just doing three launches a day now.” — The stated launch cadence is a neutral company observation without a directional fundamental conclusion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Very strong friday here” — The item reports only a strong share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “$SPCX wrong.” — The post expresses a negative attributed opinion about the company.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “It still feels like a huge post ipo dead cat bounce when it got saved a few months back.” — The attributed view that the recent recovery is a temporary dead-cat bounce is a negative forward opinion on the stock's durability.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “we made money” — The post reports a personal trading outcome, which is a price observation and not a scorable company fundamental.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX https://www.paddleyourownkanoo.com/2026/10/02/american-airlines-reportedly-working-on-secret-plans-to-bring-ultra-fast-starlink-wi-fi-across-boeing-fleet” — The item is only a bare mention of SPCX alongside unrelated news about American Airlines and Boeing.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$2 under IPO price” — The investor's stated concern that the IPO price is too low is a negative attributed valuation opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “so tired of this shit” — The post expresses strong negative sentiment toward SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$RKLB and $SPCX were up even more today” — The item reports SPXC's relative price movement, which is a neutral observation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX penny stock price action” — The item reports only a price-action observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Keep going or pullback?” — The item poses a neutral question about share-price direction without a substantive SPXC proposition.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX 185 coming fast” — The post asserts a specific bullish price target for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Share Price: $158.98” — The item reports only a share-price observation, which is explicitly neutral.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “$300 in a couple of years” — The post states an explicitly bullish forward price target for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX ending the week with a bang” — The item reports only a positive weekly share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX strong finish” — The item reports only a positive share-price move, which is explicitly price-blind and carries no directional sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “This is me.” — The post is a personal statement that does not provide a substantive sentiment proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this has all the signs of a move gaining credibility” — The item is a price-blind observation of a potential move rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “What a great day family!” — This is a general bullish observation about market breadth rather than a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this has started out in promising fashion” — The item offers only a generic, non-company-specific observation about a market start.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “I think SPCX will reach $400 minimum.” — The author makes a strongly bullish forward price target for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “10/9 next share unlock hype” — The share unlock is mentioned as a market topic without a stated directional effect on SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX Dude u need to retire , u r making no sense 🙄💪💪💪💪💪💪” — The post is a hostile reaction to an unspecified investment view rather than a substantive proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$TSLA $SPCX Merger announcement in 2 weeks.” — The item reports a future merger announcement without stating any substantive positive or negative outcome for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “it will fall like it does every time” — The item predicts a recurring share-price decline, which is a neutral observation under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “putting this in the Roth and forgetting about it until I retire” — The post describes a long-term Roth investment plan, which is a neutral company observation.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Musk’s financial empire is one giant bubble. 3.5T combined with no income” — The attributed thesis characterizes the combined valuation as a bubble and cites the absence of income as a negative fundamental.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$900 pt in 3 years” — The attributed target implies a strongly bullish forward price expectation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the action is getting progressively better.” — The item describes improving share activity without stating a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 119mill in volume!!” — The item reports only a volume observation without a substantive directional proposition.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “the future of national defense” — The item presents a strongly positive forward view of SPCX's role in national defense.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “awesome pump” — The item reports a positive share-price move without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX aint nobody sellin.......” — This is a generic bullish sentiment statement that does not provide a substantive company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “until the next batch of IPO shares get released and then this can get shorted into the ground” — The attributed thesis warns that upcoming IPO share releases could materially depress the stock.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX 173 next. RSI on daily has plenty room to run before cool off.” — The attributed technical thesis forecasts further upside before a pullback.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX was lagging, nice breakout” — The item reports only share-price performance without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Why The Market Is Moving: Nonfarm Payrolls Analysis” — The item is a market-moving analysis of nonfarm payrolls and does not present a company-specific proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “musky owns it period” — The named investor's absolute ownership claim is a strongly bullish attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “T-MOBILE REMOVES ALL REFERENCES TO SPACEX AND STARLINK FROM ITS T-SATELLITE SERVICE WEBSITE” — The removal of SpaceX and Starlink references from T-Mobile's T-Satellite service indicates a material separation of that service from SpaceX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The 2026 “Muskonomy” Explained: How Uncle Elon Musk's Empire Really Works Going Into 2027.” — The item is a general market commentary that only mentions SPCX as a ticker without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX got pulled along today” — The item reports only a price movement for SPCX without a scorable company-specific reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX is holding up good in AH.” — The item reports only a positive share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “We gon be rich by eom?” — The item is a speculative question about SPCX's share price by end-of-month, which is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “SpaceX rallied on AI power news” — The item attributes SpaceX's rally to positive AI power demand.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “10%+ drop after the red candle at the end of the day after 12 successive green candles” — The item describes a historical price pattern without stating a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX thoughts on investing in $HOUR ???” — The post is a general investment question about a different company and does not present a substantive proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I purchased a shitload of this wednesday.” — The purchase is a neutral company observation without a stated fundamental reason or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX price target next week? 165? 170?” — The post poses speculative price targets without stating a directional opinion or fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “bye bye $SPCX” — The post is a target-specific social mention that does not present a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX ok 159.50 worked” — The item reports a share price observation without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “we have a good base now” — The user's view that the stock has a solid base implies a bullish technical outlook.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “@Bulski69 We're killin' those libs. And not just in the streets of America! What a time to be alive!” — The post is general political commentary without a substantive proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “We just sent another carrier to gulf .” — Deploying another carrier indicates operational expansion and growth.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$CTVA institutions buying folks” — The post asserts institutional buying of Chiesi, which is a positive attributed investment activity.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$165.00 next ehh?” — The item is a speculative question about SPCX's share price with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Has never Used AI to call for doctor or vet appointments” — The author presents personal non-adoption of AI as evidence against its practical value.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “This is a growing monster with unlimited potential. We too see $300 by EOY.” — The source makes a strongly bullish attributed growth thesis and an explicit forward price target.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The two of us - the Wright brothers.” — The attributed comparison is a neutral observation about the two companies' roles in AI.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$300 soon” — The post expresses a bullish forward price target for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “it goes down we buy more” — The user's stated intention to buy more on a decline is a bullish attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “Manufacturing chips is very difficult.” — The attributed difficulty of chip manufacturing is a negative fundamental proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Feeling very wealthy on my birthday!” — The user's celebratory wealth feeling is a positive but subjective social sentiment about the investment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “TSMC Exploring Plans to Work With Elon Musk’s Terafab” — The item reports a TSMC partnership prospect but provides no company-specific directional assessment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$ASTS $TMUS $SPCX
https://www.megamobilecontent.com/news/2026/10/02/att-tmobile-verizon-satellite-venture-official-interim-ceo/” — The item lists SPCX alongside other satellite operators but provides no company-specific proposition or judgment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “For your evening reading pleasure.” — The item is a generic social post that mentions SPCX without a substantive directional proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$ASTS Just a single drop of blood..... 🩸” — The post is a generic, non-company-specific social comment that does not advance a substantive proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “smart money from the Cayman Islands is moving money to treasuries” — The attributed thesis that smart money is moving into treasuries implies a bearish outlook for equities.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “You’re exactly where you were one month and two billion posts ago.” — The post states a historical share-price observation without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “if you had Tesla Solar Panels and Power System, that would never happen.” — The item attributes a power-outage-prevention benefit to Tesla's solar and power system.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “However it's on back order .” — The back-order status is a neutral company observation without a stated directional impact.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Monday morning we will see another 3%-5% hike” — The forecast describes a future rate increase without stating how it will affect SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “why is this worth 2T” — The question references a reported valuation level without stating a directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Another teenager keyboard warrior…
You kids make me chuckle…” — The post is a generic, non-substantive remark about investors that does not advance a scorable proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Typical Trump teenager…” — The item expresses a negative attributed opinion about the company's investor base.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$420” — The item reports only a share price level with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Astronomers detect first-ever radio emission from an exoplanet” — The discovery is a general astronomy result with no stated connection to SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Next Friday another tranche released…” — The item reports another release cadence without stating a positive or negative impact on SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “SPACEX has 10 Billion shares being unlocked by summer of 2027.” — The user identifies a large future share unlock as a negative dilution proposition for SpaceX.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Still losing 5 billion a year…” — The post asserts a large annual operating loss for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Back to $152 on Monday..” — The item reports a share-price level without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The trump YO-YO market continues” — The item describes only a general market movement without a substantive company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “This week alerts… $SPCX , $MU , $IBRX” — The item is a generic weekly alert mentioning SPCX without any company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “This can go up or down on Monday.” — The item offers only a neutral observation about possible share-price movement without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “Elon already confirmed his partnership with intel.” — The confirmed partnership is a positive attributed proposition about Intel.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$420 by Xmas 2027” — The post sets an explicitly bullish forward price target for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$170 next week? Possibility?” — The post presents a bullish forward price target as a possibility.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Keep going. We are making progress. We know our stocks are worth much more.” — The post expresses a positive forward opinion about the company's progress and valuation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/30/musk-luckey-gingrich-pentagon-hegseth-.html” — The item is only a bare mention of SPCX with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Friday closed $158.96 (+7.4%) on 119M shares and took out the $155–$158 lid.” — The item reports a substantial share-price move without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Tsla and spcx may gap up on Monday” — The item predicts a share-price move without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$200 EOW*” — The $200 end-of-week target is a forward price observation, not a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX or $165 open” — The item reports only a price level without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 153 Monday open.” — The item reports only a share-price observation with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “Clearly it must be a scam.” — The user's explicit claim that SpaceX is a scam is a strongly negative attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX” — The item is a bare social mention of SPCX with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Bears on this ticker” — The post is a generic bearish sentiment call without a stated company-specific fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$200.00 PT predicted in about a month.” — A predicted price target is a bullish attributed forward opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “got in around 100+” — The user's entry price is a historical observation and carries no directional sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX Started the morning up by blocking as many bears as possible.” — The item reports only a morning share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX +$30” — The item reports only a share-price move, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 🥳🥳🥳” — The celebratory post is a neutral observation of investor attention without a stated fundamental reason or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “that God candle that launched this magnificent Breakout” — The item describes a reported price breakout and chart pattern without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “spacex-stock-rises-6” — The item reports only SpaceX's share-price movement, which is explicitly neutral.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “2026: ~$45B revenue / around breakeven” — The attributed thesis presents a substantial revenue forecast with near-breakeven profitability as a positive fundamental outlook.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX who snagged 106??” — The item reports a share price level without a substantive fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the Nasdaq 100 ripping testing all time highs” — The item reports a Nasdaq 100 price observation without a substantive proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “buy the "IPO dip around 60$ and ride it up"” — The post references a prior bullish price-level expectation but provides no new fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “keep shorting pricks” — The post characterizes shorting activity as aggressive and negative.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX” — The ticker is mentioned only as part of a list of popular tickers, with no company-specific sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “this is one that you can hold very long term” — The author expresses a strong forward-looking conviction that SPCX is suitable for a long-term holding.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX https://x.com/kobeissiletter/status/2106454781816340774?s=46&t=IjMPDAUaGPfEd4-vebjx4A” — The item is only a bare mention of SPCX with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “I still think this is a pummmp from Wall Street” — The user's attributed thesis that the stock is a Wall Street pump is a bullish opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$TSLA $SPCX keep subsidizing the 1 T pedo” — The post is a generic, nonsensical social mention that does not present a substantive proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “valued 110 P/S, more than in history ever” — The attributed valuation comparison is an explicitly negative fundamental opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Primary aggregate GEX level for Monday is clustering in the 769.3-770.1 range for $SPY” — The item reports aggregate options positioning for SPY without a company-specific directional proposition for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX impressive day $200” — The item reports only SpaceX's share-price movement, which is explicitly price-blind and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$INTC $SPCX $TSLA partners with TSMC Chinese company to make chips for SPCX Optimus and Tesla lol” — The user's 'fake news' claim is a negative attributed opinion about the alleged partnership.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “Scammers in the channel that turn out to be part of the channel (Martyn Lucas)” — The item alleges coordinated manipulation of $SPCX, including attempts to crash the stock and use retail as exit liquidity.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Fake News
Fake source” — The item is a generic accusation of fake news without any substantive proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Let's take the apple cart and flip it upside down.” — The quoted phrase is a generic market idiom with no substantive proposition about SPCS.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX” — The item contains only a bare mention of SPCX with no substantive proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The average person has no clue what's happening here.” — The post is a generic observation about investor awareness rather than a scorable company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Be careful chasing the up's and downs on this stock.” — The warning concerns the stock's reported price movements, which are neutral observations.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Wow 🚀” — The item is a bare bullish reaction to Tesla and Nvidia without a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “it’s going to triple” — The post asserts a strongly bullish forward price target for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “bought at $135 … added at 120 , 125 !” — The item reports only share-price levels and additions, which are neutral observations.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX https://x.com/tradexwhisperer/status/2106088848019292587?s=46&t=IjMPDAUaGPfEd4-vebjx4A” — The item only links to external content without stating a substantive proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX making wills” — The item reports a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX tested groq vs muse. Absolute joke. 20 sec vs 3 mins.” — The comparison shows SPCX's generation time is substantially slower than Groq's.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA , $MU , $PLTR , $MU and of course $SPCX.” — The post lists SPCX alongside other names without a substantive company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Bot the IPO at $135 and holding for the long term.” — The user presents a bullish long-term investment thesis for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I don’t own enough of these” — The user's comment expresses interest in the mentioned stocks but provides no substantive sentiment about Super Computer.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “$SPCX chips will compete with $NVDA chips one day or at least some market share.” — The attributed view anticipates future competitive success and market-share gains for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Nice looking trend” — The item is a price-blind observation of SPcx's trend without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$SPCX shorts just need to cover and join the Longs.” — The post presents a bullish attributed thesis that short-covering will drive longs to join the position.
stocktwits
+0.90 [social_text] “This company is a rocket ship literally and figuratively” — The author's explicit bullish thesis characterizes the company as experiencing rapid growth.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Monday morning will be Green in PM” — The item predicts a share-price move without stating a scorable company fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “I just kept buying every two weeks months ago!!” — The user's repeated purchases indicate a positive attributed investment conviction in SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.90 [social_text] “$SPCX revenue to hit 100B by Dec 26” — The item presents an explicit, highly ambitious revenue target as a forward fundamental proposition.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$SPCX over hyped” — The post asserts that investor enthusiasm for SPCX is excessive.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the fact it is above 100” — The item's only substantive proposition is about SPCX's share price level, which is a price-blind observation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX https://x.com/spcxgod/status/2106194178485145618?s=46&t=IjMPDAUaGPfEd4-vebjx4A” — The item is a bare social mention of SPCX without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “check put $HOUR as well for a big play for next week” — The post speculates on a bearish option play on Hour Energy, which is a separate company and not substantively about SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “a dying car company” — The attributed view characterizes Tesla as a dying company and asserts it cannot meet the stated valuation and earnings-multiple metrics.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$TSLA $SPCX pedogrifter gotta have fun to, christmas eve with your kids really gets you horny” — The item is an off-topic, abusive post that does not present a substantive proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “From a used online book store (est 1995) to 700 billion in revenue.” — The comparison to Amazon's revenue scale presents a strongly positive attributed growth proposition for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The 3 trillion “AI Infrastructure Capex Debt Boom” bubble mania which is single handily keeping GDP positive in the USA Isn't at the Dangerous Part Yet” — The attributed thesis is about the broader AI infrastructure market, not about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX https://www.marketscreener.com/news/spacex-s-ai-unit-in-talks-to-lease-compute-capacity-to-microsoft-ce785ddbd988f52d” — The item is only a bare mention of SpaceX with no substantive company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “cant wait for Monday!” — The post expresses anticipation for the trading week but contains no company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “everyone is starting to believe” — The item reports only a generic belief trend without a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX, $LITE, $MSFT” — The item lists SPCX as one of several stocks in a watchlist scan without providing a company-specific directional proposition.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX 200-250 by Christmas” — The user's bullish target implies a strong expected price increase.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “This pattern will break on the right for sure” — The author expresses a bullish technical view that the pattern will break to the right.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “SpaceX Stock Price Prediction 2026, 2030, 2040” — The item is only a headline about future stock-price predictions, which is a price observation and not a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “anyone enjoying the 3.7 patch?” — The post asks about user reception to a product update but provides no stated positive or negative judgment.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “IPO is Failing in Oct 2026” — The item asserts that SPCX's October 2026 IPO is failing, a strongly negative attributed outcome.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Cramer was right” — The post asserts an attributed opinion but provides no company-specific fundamental or directional thesis.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The perfectly straight line of 60 Starlink satellites from the 2019 launch is so freaking cool” — The item describes a visually interesting historical Starlink deployment without stating a substantive proposition about SpaceX's business or prospects.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “You should love the road to $100 more” — The item is a price-target-style observation about SPCX's share price, which is neutral under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Institutional buyers absorbed heavy $155 Calls ($455K prints) and sweeps up to $162.5 Calls, signaling strong conviction into the $162.23 breakout level.” — Heavy institutional call accumulation is presented as strong bullish conviction.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “From 3 days ago, coincidentally, AI stocks are rocketing higher.” — The item reports AI-sector price movement without a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “🟢 $SPCX 167.5C Oct 09” — The item reports a specific options contract and activity level without stating a directional fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Just hold it long-term; it’s bullish over the long run.” — The user expresses a strongly bullish long-term opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$300” — The item reports only a share price level without any company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Got a very good entry thankfully.” — The item reports a favorable share-price entry but contains no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Let's go SI investors.” — The post is a generic bullish cheer that does not state a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Wonder where we will be by EOY” — The item is a price-blind question about SPCX's year-end level rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Get ready for all four of these Super Intelligence monsters to fly.” — The item is a generic bullish forecast about four companies without a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Our top 5 options spread candidates for the upcoming week: $IBRX $SPCX $NBIS $CBRS $GME” — The item lists SPCX as one of several options candidates without providing a directional opinion about the company.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Our top 5 options spread candidates for the upcoming week: $IBRX $SPCX $NBIS $CBRS $GME” — The item lists SPCX as one of several options candidates without providing a company-specific directional proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Our top 5 options spread candidates for the upcoming week: $IBRX $SPCX $NBIS $CBRS $GME” — The item lists SPCX as one of several options candidates without providing a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Good breakout on high volume.” — The item reports only a price-volume breakout, which is a neutral technical observation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Trump Announces “Super Intelligence Force” to Coordinate US AI Efforts” — The announcement is a general US policy development that does not state a company-specific proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “we just keep accumulating Infleqtion which is undervalued as fuck with an unbelievable world-class team.” — The author presents a strong bullish accumulation thesis based on valuation and team quality.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this price action” — The post expresses uncertainty about SPX's price movement without stating a directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “don’t regulate AI it’s the best” — The item presents a favorable attributed opinion that the absence of AI regulation is beneficial.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “I simply need more shares” — The user expresses a personal intent to buy more shares, a moderately bullish attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “SpaceX Stock Price Prediction 2026, 2030, 2040” — The item is only a headline about a forward stock-price prediction, which is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 🚀😎” — The item is only a bullish reaction to SPCX's share price, which is a neutral observation.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “$SPCX sitting pretty with my average @ IPO $135” — The author expresses a strongly bullish opinion about SPCX's current position relative to its IPO price.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$OKLO $SPY $NVDA $MU $SPCX” — The item is a bare basket of tickers with no company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 300$” — The item reports a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “SpaceX keeps on trucking higher off its lows.” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “With the Nasdaq 100 ripping and testing all time highs” — The item reports a broad market observation without a substantive company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “2 days after earnings addi g the remainder of the shares roughly 1.3 billion will be added on 10/4 and 10/24 we have some as well tjis crap goes on thru mid 2027” — The author characterizes the ongoing share-issuance schedule as a negative proposition for SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “$SPCX 190M shares still short” — The persistent short interest is presented as a bearish signal for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “SpaceXAI is becoming SpaceXSI.” — The rename describes a neutral organizational change without a stated positive or negative impact.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I keep thinking about what Musk said about survivability for shorts here.” — The item is a speculative discussion about short survivability without a stated directional opinion on SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Conversation picked up across some of the most popular tickers on Stocktwits this week” — The item reports increased social conversation about SPNX without stating a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Let’s go Bulls!” — The user's bullish declaration expresses a positive attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “greatest wealth transfer of all times.... from pessimists to optimists” — The post characterizes a broad shift in investor sentiment toward SPCX as strongly positive.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “maybe they knew musk was coming out with a phone soon” — The item is speculative and does not state a substantive proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “teen mobile just lost elons satellite contract” — The loss of a satellite contract is a negative business development for Teen Mobile.
stocktwits
-0.90 [social_text] “Best scam in the market.” — The post is an extreme, unqualified negative attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “I keep buying the dips” — The user's repeated dip-buying and bullish target form a strongly positive attributed investment opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I'm sticking around for awhile” — The user's stated intention to hold is a neutral observation of investor attention, not a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “below 150 is over 155 new support according to charts” — The author identifies a technical support level above 155, a bullish technical proposition.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “This beautiful Breakout pattern has beautiful long legs” — The author describes a bullish technical breakout pattern with an explicitly positive outlook.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX $NVDA A marriage for the ages.” — The post mentions NVIDIA alongside SPCX but offers no substantive company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “kerp shorting morons” — The post asserts a negative shorting thesis about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$BTC.X $DJT $SPCX $TRUMP.X now Trump sending pallets of cash to Iran lol” — The item is a generic market post that does not present a substantive proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Weekly looking good with bullish engulfing - finally broke out of the 135-150 consolidation/ liquidity grab. 8/21 ema cross up on daily!” — The item describes only a bullish technical price pattern without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “SpaceX is going back to 225 in 2weeks bro” — The item reports a price target without providing a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX setting up for a big move” — The item is a price-blind forecast of a future move without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “might be able to get sued for global warming” — The item presents a Supreme Court decision on climate-related litigation as a material legal risk.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “AI stays AI.” — The item makes a neutral observation about SPCX's AI positioning without a directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “they burn more cash than ever and the revenue will always be unprofitable” — The attributed thesis emphasizes extreme cash consumption and a permanent inability to reach profitability.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SNDK $MU $NVDA $NBIS $SPCX” — The post lists multiple securities without providing any company-specific proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “underneath little over 15% of fund is composed of $TSLA & $SPCX” — The item states a neutral composition fact about an ARKK fund without a directional company opinion.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “$SPCX accumulate” — The post expresses a bullish accumulation thesis for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX $TSLA he just fricken fat; whet else he do but eat good.” — The item is a generic social post that mentions SPCX only as part of a broader, non-specific comparison.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “get Tesla Solar and a PowerWall System” — The item promotes Tesla's Powerwall system without stating a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Starship deploying Starlink V3 satellites” — The item reports a deployment activity but provides no directional company-specific outcome.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “SpaceX is a super intelligence company.” — The statement is a strongly positive attributed assessment of SpaceX's intelligence capabilities.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “a merger like this makes absolutely no sense whatsoever from a business standpoint” — The item presents a strong business-case argument against a SPXC–TSLA merger.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “5 hrs till night trading” — The item only states a neutral timing observation about the trading session.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “Never payed out shareholders” — The post asserts that the company has failed to provide shareholder payouts.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “discussions are underway” — Discussions of a potential SpaceX–TSMC deal constitute a bullish attributed forward opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “keep your advice with you and keep loosing the opportunity of a lifetime!” — The post expresses a strongly negative attributed opinion that the company's advice is causing investors to repeatedly miss opportunities.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Don’t be naïve” — The post expresses a strongly bearish attributed opinion about SPCX without stating a specific fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Break + hold 160” — The item presents a bullish technical scenario contingent on a breakout and hold above 160.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX not going to happen!!” — The item is a bare, negative prediction about the share without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “prior to a merger” — The question is about Tesla and SpaceX generally, not about SpaceX's own merger terms or prospects.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “wait for the next shares unlock to buy the dip” — The post describes a share-price dip as a potential buying opportunity, which is a neutral observation rather than a scorable fundamental proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “There are big things at play here. Figure I share the goal is a grid in space. 840MW transfer baby steps for what's to come .” — The author presents a bullish outlook on SPCX's grid-transfer development and scale.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “think the merger with Tesla will happen this year” — Kathy Woods's team expresses a positive forward expectation that the Tesla merger will occur this year.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Starlink is going to destroy $VZ and other carriers” — The post asserts a strong competitive advantage for Starlink against major carriers.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “AI for the others but what they have is SI” — The post contrasts AI and SI strategies but offers no substantive company-specific directional judgment.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Daily Wire reports $SPCX 8 billion in contracts” — The attributed report of substantial contracts is a positive business proposition for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “spacex-crew-13-iss-docking-fastest-us-spacecraft-launch-to-docking-record” — The Crew-13 docking record is a positive operational achievement for SpaceX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 futures open green” — The item reports only a broad-market futures move with no company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “A profit is expected.” — The author presents an explicit positive forward expectation of profitability.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Bears rn” — The bearish remark is a general market observation without a specific SPXC proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX too low .” — The item is a price-blind assessment of SPcx's share level with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX any launches this week?” — The post asks a neutral question about a potential launch without stating whether one is expected.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “He doesn’t currently have majority voting control of Tesla.” — The item states a governance constraint that a Tesla–SpaceX combination could help resolve.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$3 to $7.00 so far swing” — The item reports a historical share-price move without a scorable company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$165.00 this weak easy” — The item reports only a share price level and a subjective assessment of weakness, which is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “another 7%+ day for Monday” — The item is a price prediction without a stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “this is a stock you have to own” — The author expresses a strong attributed conviction that the investor should own SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “investors had shorted about 162.3M SpaceX shares, worth roughly $23.3B-enormous exposure for a newly public company.” — The attributed assessment of enormous short exposure presents a bearish fundamental proposition about SpaceX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$165-$170 this week” — The item reports only a price range without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Crew-13 docked at 7:05 PM ET Thursday, 7 hours 55 minutes after liftoff. Fastest launch-to-docking trip by a US spacecraft in ISS history, per NASA.” — The record-setting docking time is a strong positive operational result for SpaceX's crew missions.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX almost that time ⏲️” — The item is a price-related observation without a stated fundamental reason or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX” — The post is a generic social observation about a user's interactions and does not present a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 8 billion boi!!!!” — The post is an enthusiastic social mention of SPCX but contains no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$SPCX will merge with $TSLA before Trump leaves office.” — The item presents a specific forward merger timeline as a bullish proposition for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “imagine a potential monopoly on communication, a potential monopoly on even the most generic space payload needs” — The author presents a potential monopoly as a major positive opportunity for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “SpaceX can be an incredible company, dominate launch, grow Starlink and still be overpriced at a given stock price.” — The item presents a valuation proposition about SpaceX but does not specify a directional fundamental conclusion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I put 80% of my port into $SPCX” — The user's heavy position is a personal allocation observation, not a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$QQQ $SPCX $SPY $TSLA” — The item is a general market rant that does not present a substantive proposition about SPXC.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “SpaceX has an extraordinary competitive position in launch, and Starlink is a legitimately valuable business.” — The post affirms SpaceX's strong competitive position and the economic value of Starlink.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Should be a volatile week” — The item offers a neutral, non-directional observation about expected volatility without a scorable company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Watchlist $SPCX” — The item lists SPCX as part of a technical-analysis watchlist without providing a substantive directional proposition.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “each of which has a much higher price target on SPCX” — The item reports multiple prominent analysts maintaining higher price targets for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 1000 today” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX let’s gooo 🚀🚀🚀🚀🚀” — The post is enthusiastic but contains no substantive company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX Short squeeze!!!” — The item is a bare social claim of a squeeze without stated evidence or a fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “next unlock is Friday. Every single unlock has dipped the day before and half the time, dipped the day of too. So I think maybe we see gains Monday to Wednesday and then some pullback at the end of the week.” — The item forecasts share-price movements around unlocks, which is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “SpaceX Stock Price Prediction 2026, 2030, 2040” — The item is only a headline about future stock-price predictions, which is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Down 25% from it's all time high
Up 50% from it's low” — The item reports only historical share-price ranges without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$169 by Friday” — The attributed price target is a strongly bullish forward opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 170+ this week?!” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Launch day: Falcon 9, SDA Tranche 1 Transport Layer A, 4:17 AM ET from Vandenberg, California.” — The item reports a launch event without stating a substantive outcome or attributed opinion about SpaceX.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “$MU likely partner on the memory side.” — The post presents a plausible but unconfirmed partnership between SPCX and Micron as a positive potential development.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “how can buying this not be successful in the future” — The user expresses a strongly bullish forward opinion that buying SPCX will be successful.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX China is the problem.” — The item identifies China exposure as a material problem for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “It's possible we'll see a breakout into a new channel today, given the momentum and volume from Friday.” — The item is a price-blind forecast of share-price movement, which carries no directional sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “very optimistic this could get above 160 and hold the sky's is the limit.” — The post expresses an explicitly bullish forward price expectation for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “profit taking is happening” — The post describes a price reaction without stating a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “especially for a 2T with negative FCF $SPCX and a company with quarter T company with a 5000 P/E $CRWD” — The user contrasts SPCX's negative free cash flow with CrowdStrike's valuation to imply SPCX is comparatively more attractive.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Retail Traders Seize On T-Mobile Dropping Starlink Name From Satellite Page” — The item reports retail attention to ASTS following a competitor's satellite-page change, without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about ASTS.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX will this end year at $250+?” — The item is a price-target question about SPcx's year-end level and carries no fundamental or attributed directional opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX , $PL, and $RDW are the space Im buying.” — The post identifies SPCX as one of several space stocks the author is buying, which is a neutral company observation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [news] “SpaceX's upcoming earnings update could tell us a little more about its prospects.”
— The item is a neutral observation that an upcoming update may provide additional information, without stating a directional fundamental proposition.SpaceX Earnings: 3 Numbers Long-Term Investors Should Watch +0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX no launch today, tomorrow next attempt” — The item reports a single-day launch delay without providing a substantive fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “Falcon 9 is ready to take off now” — Readiness for a Falcon 9 launch is a positive operational proposition for SpaceX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX super” — The brief social post is a positive but non-substantive expression of attention to SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “$250.00 near term!” — The item states an explicit bullish near-term price target for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX be ready for this” — The post is a generic readiness prompt that does not state a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX Is Grok really that out of favor? Not in top ten?” — The post questions SPX's relative investor attention without stating a directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX and you pulled those numbers from where?” — This question indicates investor attention but contains no directional fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Many people are recommending it” — The item reports broad recommendation activity without a specific company thesis or outcome.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX” — The item contains only a bare price mention with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “MORGAN STANLEY: SPACEX “CHEAP AND GETTING CHEAPER”” — Morgan Stanley's attributed thesis that SpaceX is undervalued and becoming cheaper is a strongly negative valuation opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX OMG! 🚀🚀🚀” — The post is an ungrounded social reaction that does not state a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “sold and covered call. So prematurly at $157.65 and covered calls ( strike $160- 11/20/26 ) at $11.50 while owning stock at $126 . Why? the options were working against my calls.” — The author describes a premature covered-call sale and option structure that constrained upside.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “This is in a Breakout pattern.” — The author identifies a bullish technical pattern for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$SPCX easy 165 today” — The post expresses a bullish price target for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX
Uh oh…
😂” — The post is a brief, non-directional reaction to SPCX that records attention without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “low IQ stock” — The post expresses a strongly negative attributed opinion about SPCX's investment quality.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “Benzinga is a pay to play news source…
Good luck with that” — The post expresses a negative attributed opinion about Benzinga's independence and the user's outlook for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “hover here a bit or back to the 130s/140s” — The item only speculates about SPCX's share-price range without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “I don’t believe the current valuation is justified yet.” — The author explicitly disputes that SpaceX's current valuation is justified.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I don't think this ticker moves on launches one way or another.” — The item is a neutral observation that SPCX's price does not move on launches.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX US NDAQ is red today.” — The item reports only a same-day share-price observation without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “please go deep red” — The item is a price-direction request rather than a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “You serve as exit liquidity for the insiders who bought in when it was cheap” — The attributed thesis characterizes the company as exit liquidity for insiders who bought at low prices.
stocktwits
-0.50 [social_text] “i need updated projections to feel good about these prices” — The investor's stated need for updated projections reflects a negative sentiment toward the current valuation given the company's expansion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Can't wait for Elon's next announcement for Millions of Robotaxi's "sometime next year" . It's been an annual tradition to make that announcement for over a decade....” — The item presents a neutral observation about Tesla's recurring robotaxi announcement tradition without a directional company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “it’s holding” — The item reports a price observation without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “nothing more then a AI rendering and hope.” — The attributed opinion frames SPCX as a hopeful AI-driven opportunity.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “X certainly is gonna give it you!” — The post expresses a strongly positive attributed opinion that X will benefit SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “those who held” — The author argues that holding shares is the preferable strategy versus trading.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “now up 63%” — The item reports only a historical share-price move, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “TSMC (TSM) and Elon Musk's Terafab semiconductor production initiative are discussing a potential collaboration under which TSMC would build and operate a facility that will exclusively serve Elon Musk's Tesla (TSLA), SpaceX (SPCX), and xAI companies.” — A potential TSMC facility exclusively serving Musk's companies would displace Intel's planned 14A supply to Terafab.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SAIQ $SPCX potential right here IMO” — The item offers an unqualified comparative observation without a stated fundamental reason or attributed opinion about either company.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “roughly 10 billion shares will be released by the summer of 2027” — The user's calculation implies a very large share release over a short period, which is a negative dilution proposition.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “how new launch competitors will squeeze margins” — The user asks how new launch competitors could pressure SpaceX's margins, presenting a negative competitive proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$162” — The item reports only a share price level without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX gap down under 157.” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “We buy and hold longs don't sweat the daily price swings like those day trading, and options guys do.” — The item expresses a neutral buy-and-hold trading philosophy without a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Who cares about pre market?!” — The item is a price-blind observation about pre-market trading rather than a scorable company fundamental.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “but-neither-stock-is-cheap” — The attributed view that neither SpaceX nor Rocket Lab is cheap is a neutral valuation observation without a directional company-specific conclusion.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “The capitulation of this scam will be fun to watch.” — The post asserts the company is a scam and predicts its collapse, a strongly negative attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX wanna give my $FLY a Ride?” — The post is a speculative, non-substantive question about SpaceX that does not present a scorable company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “this will go places in few years” — The user expresses a strongly bullish forward opinion about SPCX's future performance.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “WE CELEBRATE BY PURCHASING MORE OVER HERE!” — The post is a celebratory call to buy that records SPX investor attention without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “Next earnings report will show revenue growth” — The item forecasts revenue growth, a positive operating proposition.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “their losses are outpacing revenue growth” — Losses growing faster than revenue is a negative profitability proposition.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “your communist friends told you everyone was selling and you envious idiotic travelers believed them” — The post mocks bearish sentiment as mistaken and implies a bullish outlook for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Letsssssss goooooooooo” — The item is only a bullish price reaction with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “extremely stupid if you compare with any kind of stock, look $SPCX for instance or the potential $2 trillion IPO of Anthropic.
These are garbage companies that must go down at least 90%+ and that will happen sooner or later when AI bubble bursts.” — The user's comparison and thesis that SPCX is a garbage company destined for a massive decline is a strongly negative attributed investment opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Next resistance at $172” — The item reports a technical resistance level without a directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The money has infiltrated politics to the point where the nation has been hijacked by the top 1% ruling class.” — The post expresses broad political grievances without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “next target $235” — The user's stated next price target is a bullish forward opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “we don’t sell we accumulate” — The user's stated accumulation thesis is a strongly bullish attributed investment opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “BULLISH CHARTS SHOW BREAK $165” — The item presents a bullish technical reading of SPCX's chart behavior.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX taking flight r2 169 coming soon” — The item reports a price target and anticipated movement but provides no fundamental or attributed-opinion reason to score.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$225 by Christmas” — The post sets an explicit bullish price target for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “its going to $650 as soon as the $SPCX deal is announced and elmo has to do it any day now” — The post attributes a bullish acquisition thesis to Elon Musk, though it remains speculative and unverified.
stocktwits
+0.90 [social_text] “this is the future of America” — The post expresses an extremely bullish attributed opinion about the company's future importance.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX daily crossed 60 rsi talk about momentum and buying pressure.” — The RSI crossing 60 is a reported technical observation without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “get the f”” out now” — The post urges immediate selling as a bearish short thesis for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Another clean win locked in.” — The trader reports a successful options position as a clean win.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “will take profit around that zone to add to long positions” — The post describes a strategy to add to long positions, indicating a bullish view.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX CALLS. ARE. PRINTING.” — The item is a bare, enthusiastic observation of share-price movement with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “Shit for Brains” — The post expresses strongly negative sentiment toward SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$800 incoming” — The post asserts a specific bullish price target for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 180 eow anyone?” — The item is a price target question that does not state a substantive bullish or bearish proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “That right there is some seriously uninformed dumb azz sht!
Buy a clue bro.” — The post is a strongly negative attributed opinion about the quality of investor commentary on SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 200 coming” — The item is a price target prediction, but the only company-specific proposition is a reported share-price move, which is neutral.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX now she is ready for the next leg up...” — The post expresses a strongly bullish forward view on SPCX's price trajectory.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “destroyed all space stocks” — The item reports a relative outperformance but provides no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$SPCX not a good time to be short” — The post expresses a forward-looking opinion that shorting SPCX is unfavorable.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX get out now , SKY is falling , Zombie apocalypse...” — The post expresses an extreme bearish view of SPCX, though the exaggerated imagery is clearly satirical.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “it's broken lad” — The item reports a share-price move without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “going to $200 again” — The item is a price prediction with no stated fundamental reason for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Datasea received a 180-day Nasdaq extension related to the $1 minimum bid requirement.” — The extension is a neutral regulatory observation without a stated positive or negative impact.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “FY2026 gross profit grew 70.1%” — Substantial year-over-year gross-profit growth is a strong positive operating result.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$RKLB should have broken out of consolidation with $SPCX ...” — The attributed technical expectation concerns RKLB, not SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX close right here for a fantastic continuation day.” — The item is a price-blind observation of a continuation day and does not state a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “this will see below $100 again this year” — The post forecasts another sub-$100 price level for SPCX this year, a bearish short-term outlook.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk confirmed that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. could take part in his Terafab chip manufacturing venture in Texas — a project Intel had been first to support.” — TSMC's participation in the venture Intel supported creates competitive pressure on Intel's manufacturing opportunity.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “3.7x Vol/OI” — High options volume-to-open interest is a neutral activity observation without a stated directional thesis.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “vivk vivk vivk” — The repeated 'vivk' string is an uninterpretable reference to SPXC's share price with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX is up 5%” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$SPCX under 164.50 would be alarming” — The named level is presented as a technical support threshold for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Daily chart getting toppy” — The item reports a technical price observation without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX no one gonna take profits I see eh..” — The post expresses a bullish view but does not provide a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX Free FALL !!” — The item is a bare, unattributed exclamation about SPCX that provides no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$SPCX lamo” — The post expresses a strongly negative social opinion about SpaceX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “This really pisses off the Elon haters” — The post is a generic reaction to Elon Musk sentiment and does not state a substantive proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX deal with Taiwan semiconductor” — The item mentions a Taiwan semiconductor deal but provides no substantive direction or outcome for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Same again tomorrow?” — The post expresses interest in watching SPCX again but contains no directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX fun!” — The item is a bare, positive social remark about SPCX that does not state a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “CEO and stock buyback program on the near horizon” — The anticipated buyback program is a positive capital-return proposition for Micron.
stocktwits
+0.00 [news] “building and running a factory that would serve only Tesla Inc (NASDAQ:TSLA), SpaceX Corp (NASDAQ:SPCX) and xAI for his Terafab chipmaking initiative.”
— Talks about a dedicated factory are a neutral company observation without a stated fundamental outcome.Musk confirms talks with TSMC over Terafab chip plant +0.00 [social_text] “trying a small put for an intraday cool off but looks good on the upside” — The item describes only intraday price action without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$BEAT huge news getting in” — The item reports a positive price reaction to unspecified news, which is a neutral observation under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “can we just go to $250 today already” — The post expresses impatience about a reported share-price level without stating a fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX it's a little SeXI.” — The post is a brief, non-directional social mention of SPCX that does not state a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
-0.90 [social_text] “The most overpriced trash in the stock market” — The source makes an extreme negative attributed valuation opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$180 next” — The post states a bullish forward price target for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “$SPCX EXTREMLY BULLISH🚀” — The post is an explicitly bullish attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX This is amateurs drivel is by far the dumbest, most ignorant post of the day. GET BETTER INDICATORS MEATHEAD!” — The post is a hostile exchange about trading indicators rather than a substantive proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$175 by Halloween” — The user's target price is an explicitly bullish forward opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “i expect it to dump a bit at close” — The item is a price prediction with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion to score.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX pulledbacked to it and bounced from there” — The item describes only SPCX's price action without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “bro free money like this is crazy we are all rich” — The post expresses strong enthusiasm about the company's perceived opportunity.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “QQQ's hitting a new ATH every minute bro” — The item reports QQQ's price movement without a scorable proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 170+ get it” — The post indicates some investor attention but provides no substantive directional proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “these three communists from the left media told you travelers that everybody was selling!” — The post attributes a bearish selling thesis to a named media group, which is a scorable attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “the options / derivatives dynamics to prevent falls and protect while the 0dte will keep propelling it” — The attributed thesis describes derivative mechanics that the source characterizes as preventing falls and artificially propelling the stock.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “nice jump on $SPCX” — The item reports a share-price move without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “This is GOLD!” — The post expresses strongly bullish sentiment toward SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Fly is trading under the radar..best value imho” — The user's 'best value' comment is a positive attributed valuation opinion on SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Musk’s discussions with TSMC about Terafab add another reason to watch $SPCX.” — The discussion is a neutral observation of a development topic without a stated positive or negative outcome.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “The shorts are so cooked, burnt to a crackley crunch.” — The post expresses a strongly bullish attributed opinion that short positions have been decisively defeated.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Options flow agrees — Flow Score 4.7, call volume above puts at 193K vs 176K. P/C at 0.91 with a +11.4% shift over 5 days, so positioning is tilting bullish.” — The bullish positioning is explicitly qualified as not a forecast and is offset by hedging and declining open interest.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$200 EOY.” — The post states an explicitly bullish forward price target for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Thank you thank you thank you 😃” — The post is a generic expression of gratitude that does not state a substantive proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX $TSLA lol 😂🚀🚀🤑🤑🚀” — The post is a bare, joking mention of SPCX without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX sike!!” — The item is a bare, non-substantive social mention of SPCX without a scorable company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX looking like it wants to close 168+, would be a huge hold and win for bulls.” — The post presents a bullish technical thesis about the expected close and its implications for bulls.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX buying the dip payed off” — The item reports a favorable share-price move without a scorable underlying fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$SPCX doesnt $NKE make more then this turd stock snd that thing is in a free fall” — The post expresses a strongly negative investor view of SPCX by comparing it unfavorably to another company and describing it as a 'turd stock'.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “the clear leader in technology” — The source explicitly characterizes ASTS as the clear technology leader.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX (trending)” — The item reports SPCX as trending but provides no directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX Squeeze” — The headline reports a price-related squeeze without stating a fundamental reason or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX so what” — The post is a bare, non-directional remark about SPCX that does not state a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX power hour to 190” — The item reports only a share-price level without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Elon is openly seeking a 1T bonus. Straight out of the shareholders pocket.” — The attributed claim frames a proposed bonus as a direct, large-scale transfer of shareholder value.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “That's a strong breakout - two tall green candles.” — The item describes a bullish technical price pattern without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Great points!!!” — The post is a generic positive reaction to unspecified points and provides no company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX hes not a US citizen.” — The statement is a neutral company observation with no directional sentiment.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “that's the same fraud pumper who published "extensive research" to tell investors to buy Rivian when it was $100.” — The item attributes a prior misleading investment recommendation to the same source promoting SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “The new $MN ETF pulled in ~$22M in its first two days” — Strong initial demand for an ETF that includes SPCX indicates positive investor interest.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Sentiment is up 98% over the past month” — The item reports only a share-price movement, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 200 magnet near term?” — The item poses a neutral technical question without a stated directional opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “the retail will be left with nothing after this” — The attributed thesis predicts severe retail losses, which is a strongly negative forward opinion about the company.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “let’s push over 190” — The item is a price target observation with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 168 wall” — The item reports only a share-price milestone without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX oh she runnin runnin…” — The item is a bare, directionless observation of share-price movement with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “why’s $LUNR underperforming so badly …..” — The post attributes poor performance to LUNR, but the item is not substantively about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “finally broke even” — Breaking even is a reported price observation and carries no directional sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX Pullback tomorrow” — The item reports a price pullback without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “see you into 2035/2040” — The user's comment expresses a strongly bullish long-term investment view for SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “there are way too many puts” — The post asserts heavy put positioning as a bearish signal for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX
reasonable minds” — The post mentions SPCX but offers no substantive company proposition, so it records only neutral investor attention.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “While my “space” list all down
Except $SPCX” — The item reports SPACX's relative outperformance but contains no scorable company fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX i love me some Elon” — The post expresses personal enthusiasm for Tesla but does not state a substantive proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Under 200 going fast” — The item reports only a price movement without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The Treasury Dept enabled auto-enrollment & stock donations for Trump Accounts, turning the program into a universal child investment vehicle.” — The item describes a Treasury policy change affecting Trump Accounts without presenting a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$300 is the PT” — The stated price target is a bullish forward opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Guaranteed won’t hold!!!” — The post expresses an extremely bullish conviction that the stock will continue rising.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “The firm that's been around for how long has a 300.00 price target” — The attributed Morgan Stanley price target is a positive forward analyst opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 180 tomorrow” — This is a bare price prediction without any stated fundamental reason or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Gonna read about you Elon lovers soon in NYPost, you did not take profit right, wait till real face shows” — The post expresses a strongly bullish social opinion that the company's prospects will be vindicated by an upcoming New York Post article.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX
¡ Si se puede!” — The post is a bare mention of SPCX without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 👇🏼” — The item only reports a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “thank you bears musk is a trillionaire now. Keep shorting” — The post explicitly thanks bears and encourages shorting, expressing a strongly bearish social opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “WHOEVER THINKING THIS IS A $2,000 STOCK” — The post asserts an extremely bullish long-term price target for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.90 [social_text] “This stock will keep going up no matter what the company does.” — The author's explicit prediction that the stock will keep rising is a strongly bullish attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX a $ 1,000 stock” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX this could open 180+” — This is a price prediction and not a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “basically a telecom competing against Tmobile and Verizon” — The comparison describes SPCX's competitive context without stating a directional advantage or disadvantage.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$SPCX bears are playing with fire and will smell the smokes” — The attributed bearish thesis is explicitly negative and speculative.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$170 got smoked” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Sweet…” — The item is only a neutral observation of SPCX's share price movement with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this stock seems to be doing its own thing today” — The item reports only an unattributed, non-directional observation of the stock's behavior.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX bingo” — The item is a bare mention of SPCX without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$300” — The item reports only a share price level without any company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Bear accounts was exit liquidity” — The post presents a bearish thesis that bearish positions were providing exit liquidity.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “let’s do $300.00 before January 2027” — The post expresses a strongly bullish forward price target for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “both buy SPCH target $35” — The attributed analyst target is a positive forward opinion on SPCH, not on SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “What a Great Day for SpaceX thank you 🙏 Elon the Genius” — The post is a celebratory social reaction to SpaceX's day rather than a scorable company fundamental.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “just pump and pump to the highs with no pull back and sit there” — The item describes a reported price pattern without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$AAOI MM shaked at 96 coupled days ago... now pump” — The item reports only historical share-price movements for AAOI and SPCX without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX lfg !” — The item is a brief, positive social cheer that indicates attention but provides no scorable company fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “$3,000 by EoY 2030” — The item states an explicit bullish price target for SPCX by 2030.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 300+ minimum” — The item reports a price level without a stated fundamental reason or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “I’m as bullish as it gets” — The user expresses an explicitly bullish opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this follows $SPCX whenever there is a nice pop” — The observation describes a price correlation without a substantive fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “The market will crash in a few months with increasing rates, bond yields rising, and poor home sales.” — The attributed bearish thesis links rising rates, yields, and weak home sales to a market crash.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “thank you for my 131 cost basis” — The item reports a historical share-price gain relative to the investor's cost basis, which is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX we win!” — The item is a celebratory reaction to a price move, which is not scorable sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 🥂” — The celebratory mention is a neutral observation of investor attention without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Bye-bye $160’s!” — The item reports a share-price level change without stating a company-specific fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 165 tag tomorrow” — A predicted share-price level is a price observation and carries no directional sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Let's make a new 52W high!” — A call for a new 52-week high is a price-level observation and carries no fundamental direction.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Bears will be talking ish all the way up!” — The post expresses a bearish opinion about SPCX's near-term outlook.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “this is going to tank just before the mid term and after” — The post expresses a strongly bearish forward opinion about SPCX's price movement.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “Dont understand why funds wouldnt take profits, let the lockup expire, and then buy back in for another bull leg” — The post expresses a bearish expectation that funds will take profits before the next lockup expiration.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 175C above 171.08” — The item reports a price level and call option above it, which is a neutral market observation without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Musk holds half of that.” — The disclosed ownership concentration is a neutral company observation.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “bro it’s literally never dipping again free money bulls keep buying” — The post expresses a strongly bullish social opinion that the stock will not decline and that buying is free.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “I just see higher highs coming in weekly right now.” — The user's stated technical view anticipates continued upward price movement.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX that shit so high MC 😂😂😂” — The post is a price-focused reaction that does not state a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “runs on pump energy” — The item describes share-price momentum without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “does it break and hold 172.50 tomorrow?” — The item is a price-level question with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “This is going to be my best year ever!” — The author expresses a strongly bullish expectation about their investment outcome.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX pumper identified” — The item is a price-focused observation with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “thank u bulls hahaha” — The user's sarcastic remark expresses bullish sentiment toward SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 220 this week” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [news] “Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas reiterates his bullish view of SpaceX in a recent Wall Street research report.”
— The analyst's reiterated bullish view is a strongly positive attributed opinion on SpaceX.SpaceX Stock Keeps Getting ‘Cheaper and Cheaper’ +0.00 [social_text] “share counts are irrelevant” — The item makes a neutral observation about share counts without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “People really have zero clue of the sheer magnitude of this stock.” — The post asserts that the market substantially underappreciates SPCX's magnitude.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$SPCX cycu will rise” — The post offers a forward-looking bullish view on SPCX's cyclical performance.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “it’s just silly” — The item expresses a negative attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “time to add” — The post expresses a bullish forward opinion that the investor should add to their position.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 180 today” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I got my almost 11 shares. I’m rolling hard average cost 145 now let’s get a five for one split.” — The post records a small position and an anticipated split, but contains no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$200 ahead” — The item is only a price target observation with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “Trust your research. I research deeply BEFORE committing to any security.” — The author's stated research discipline is a positive attributed investment opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX (+0.7% pre)” — The item reports only SpaceX's premarket price movement, which is explicitly price-blind and carries no directional sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “180 today” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Today 10%+” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “whoever keeps doubting Elon doesn’t understand what’s happening to the world” — The post attributes a positive understanding of world events to belief in Elon Musk, implying a favorable influence on SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$172.83 in 1 hour, $176.44 next target then $182.44” — The item sets a bullish technical target for SPCX if it holds a specified level.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX Lets go!” — The item is a generic bullish cheer that provides no substantive company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$SPCX clearly manipulated.” — The post makes a direct negative allegation about SpaceX's market conduct.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX $ZONE wow👀” — The post expresses strong but non-directional attention to SPCX without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$180 + today” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “These space stocks will be going up” — The user makes a bullish forward prediction about space stocks, including SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX $TSLA $VST $AAOI those my favorite name trade only” — The post lists SPCX among a set of favored names, which is a neutral company observation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Still overbought, waiting n sidelines until this goes to oversold or the very least neutral 4 hour RSI” — The item is a price-blind technical observation about SPCX's RSI state and a trading stance, not a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 2.25 T company’s pop up over night” — The overnight price move is a neutral observation and not a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$200 end of week” — The item states a price target but provides no supporting fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “This nation is a scam through and through” — The post expresses broad political condemnation but does not state a company-specific proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 200” — The item reports only a share-price level without any scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX not touching anymore until the opening bell dust/algos settle.” — The item describes only a reported share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “look out belowwwww” — The item is a price-related warning but states no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “Ready to buy 200K more.” — The post expresses stated buying interest in SPCX shares.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$175-180 today” — The item reports only a price range without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “New support $166/$167” — The identified support level is a technical observation with no directional sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “this is a pummp…” — The truncated social post asserts a bullish pump thesis about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$200.00 soon” — The item is a price target observation with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX is buying tsla” — The item reports a proposed acquisition but provides no substantive evidence that the deal will occur or its merits.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$175.00” — The item reports only a share price level, which is explicitly neutral.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Goldman Sachs reiterates SpaceX as buy” — Goldman's reiterated buy rating is a positive attributed analyst opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “watchlist for today is the usually suspects for continuation $SPCX $TSLA $NVDA $GOOGL $INTC” — The item lists SPCX as part of a general continuation watchlist without a company-specific directional proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 19 EXCLAMATION POINTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!” — The post is an uncontextualized expression of attention that does not state a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Microwave on wheels looking good right now with these gas prices.” — The item is a general observation about microwave demand and gas prices, not a substantive company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Most listened.” — The item records a neutral listening metric for SPCX without a directional investment proposition.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$SPCX 660M SHARES LOCKUP next 3 weeks” — The post presents an imminent large lockup as a negative near-term risk.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Goldman Sachs reiterates SpaceX as buy” — Goldman Sachs' reiterated buy rating is a strongly positive attributed analyst opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “too many shorts today in MB” — The item reports short interest and a bullish expectation, but the stated price reaction is a neutral observation.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “the fake pumpers are out in full force” — The post attributes a bullish pump to manipulators, presenting a negative attributed opinion about the activity.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$1.33 ➡️ $13.00” — The item reports only a share-price move, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “neither .. going to 190” — The item is only a price-level observation with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “obviously bullish for many years to come. We barely even scratched the surface yet and spacex is clearly the sharpest edge.” — The item presents a strongly bullish forward opinion on SpaceX's long-term investment prospects and competitive position.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “either it’s going to go to sub 170 or it’s fuxking 180 by 4pm” — The item is a price-only prediction with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion to score.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX this chart 1hr 30 min and 15 all remind me of $MU CHARTS BACK WHEN IT STARTED REALLY REALLY RIPPING…” — The item is a chart-based comparison of SPCX's recent price movement to a historical pattern, which is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Great Britain won the global colonial race due to a powerful navy, geographic advantages, and a strong focus on commercial trade.” — The item's substantive proposition is about British colonial history and does not bear on SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX ↗️↗️↗️” — The item only reports a bullish share-price move for SPCX without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “good run up 200%+” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Invest early donot chase” — The attributed advice to buy early and avoid chasing is a moderately bullish investment opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX shorts a$$E$ are on 🔥 🤣!” — The item is a humorous observation about short interest without a substantive directional opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$MU $SPCX now twice as valuable as MU” — The comparison is a stated valuation observation without a directional fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Daily consolidation happening, for another leg up.” — The item reports a price pattern without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I’m in I’m not missing out like I missed out on $TSLA” — The post expresses a neutral participation observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX unworldly lol” — The item is a bare, non-substantive social remark about SPCX that conveys no directional company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 1 Day interval.........Nice!” — The item is only a positive reaction to a reported one-day price interval and contains no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “this company’s earnings are still in the negative” — The attributed observation that earnings remain negative is a negative profitability proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$TSLA TSLA 385 close today📈📈📈📈” — The item reports Tesla's closing price and momentum but provides no scorable company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “giving us a chance to load up” — The post frames the share as an opportunity to increase a position.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Feels good holding from 120” — The item is a price-blind observation of a holding position and does not state a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “keep bouncing it off the 1 minute 50 ema all day” — The item describes only a short-term technical price pattern with no fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “lame ass barcoding” — The user's harsh characterization is a negative attributed opinion on SPCX's barcoding product quality.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “$SPCX just bought some puts” — Buying puts is a bearish option position on SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “she wants to play hard ball today okay” — The item is a price-blind observation of SPCX's intended trading behavior rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I’ll bet you’re fun at parties.” — The item is a neutral, non-fundamental observation about SPCX that records investor attention without a directional opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “I'm not selling a single share. Not looking at Puts, nope!” — The user's stated refusal to sell or buy puts expresses strong bullish conviction.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “when I buy it goes down” — The item reports only a historical share-price reaction without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “the probability of a near-term correction in SpaceX appears exceptionally high” — The technical analysis explicitly forecasts a high probability of a near-term price correction.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Im up 772% lol” — The item reports only a historical share-price move, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “longs be careful here. Wouldn’t enter a long here if I’m not planning to DCA” — The author cautions against entering long positions without a dollar-cost-averaging plan.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “looking crazy bullish” — The social post expresses a strongly bullish opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “the stocks just got too many legs to go down and reaching out like tentacles” — The user's technical thesis that the stock has strong upward momentum is a bullish attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX LFGGG. LUNCHTIME MADDNESS!!!” — The post is an enthusiastic but directionless reaction that does not state a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX pull back a bit” — The item reports only a share-price pullback without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$SPCX need more bears for fuel 🤣” — The joke implies the stock is already sufficiently bearish, which is a bullish attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$170P 10/9 1.73” — The user is buying a put option, which is a bearish position on SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Why dis up?” — The item only asks about a reported share-price move, which is neutral under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “they really don’t want this to drop” — The post is a price-blind observation of share-price direction without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX green to red move coming” — The item reports only a potential share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Atleast $190” — The item states a bullish forward price target for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Fly me to the moon!” — The item is a price-blind observation of SPCX's share movement with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “trip to the moon on gas pipes” — The item is a hyperbolic prediction of a large share-price move, which is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$TSLA $500 this year” — The item reports Tesla's share-price performance without a scorable proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX fire 🔥 and brimstones?” — The rhetorical question is a generic, non-directional social mention that does not state a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX sub 150 plxz” — The item reports only a share-price level without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “$SPCX bears trying to short a company that has 50x-100x potential” — The attributed short thesis is explicitly contradicted by a very bullish forward growth opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NLST $SMMT $SPCX $TSLA” — The item lists SPCX alongside other tickers without any company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX to the moon 🚀🌕Diamond Hands! 💎” — The post expresses an explicitly bullish social opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 😎🚀” — The post is a bare bullish reaction with no company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “If shorts was gonna drop it red. It would already be red IMO.” — The author's view that shorts are not sufficiently active implies a bullish squeeze expectation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX relax , what’s the rush?” — The post is a neutral, non-directional observation about investor sentiment rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX wheres some good news???” — The post is a bare, unsourced question about SP CX that does not state a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “Im looking long term like 10 years .” — The user's stated long-term holding intention is a moderately bullish attributed investment opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “round 2 babbyyy!!!!” — The repeated celebratory exclamation expresses enthusiastic investor sentiment toward SpaceX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 174 breaks and we off to 178” — The item reports only a share-price breakout and move, which is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Expect a big pop later or tomorrow. Both charts are super bullish.” — The author offers an explicitly bullish technical forecast for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “WISeSat.Space, WQEY's satellite arm, has flown satellites on Falcon 9 rideshare missions. Its 21st satellite, WISeSat 4.0, reached low Earth orbit in March 2026 on Transporter-16 from Vandenberg” — The successful orbital insertion of WISeSat 4.0 demonstrates execution of SpaceX launch services for WQEY.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 10/5 167.18s sold at 175 at the open” — The item reports only a share-price transaction and does not state a scorable company fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “a downfall to 14.50” — The item reports only a share-price decline without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “very profit secured and counting” — The item reports a neutral trading outcome without a scorable company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “find companies whose insiders are not selling!” — The item frames insider selling as a negative benchmark, implying the absence of selling is favorable.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “insiders are selling” — The post asserts that insiders are selling shares, a negative attributed signal about the company.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “$SPCX will fly through $175” — The author makes an explicitly bullish forward price forecast for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX slap that ask!” — The item is a bare, target-specific price reaction with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion to score.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I bought back my calls 180 Monday let’s go” — The post describes a call-buyback and bullish sentiment but contains no company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion to score.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “So many fake bulls in here and many people who would sell fake interpretations of charts to their followers in attempt to make a few dollars.” — The item is a general warning about dishonest traders on StockTwits rather than a substantive proposition about SPCX itself.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Will take over space.” — The author asserts a strong bullish conviction that the company will dominate its market.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I think it’s giving up now” — The attributed bearish view is not a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “almost ready to launch like $SPCX, but with positive earnings.” — The comparison suggests a positive earnings outlook for Micron.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “breather today crazy again tomorrow” — The item is a price-blind observation of SPcx's intraday volatility without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “still sitting pretty” — The item reports a favorable share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “how much are these scam banks paid to put out this absurd price targets” — The post attributes a negative opinion to bank analysts' price targets.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX Come to Daddy!” — The item is a bare, non-substantive mention of SPCX without a scorable company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I’d be pumping other tickers too if I was down 90% on $AIXI” — The post is a price-blind observation about the author's hypothetical reaction to a loss, not a substantive proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Grab all these shorts baby!!” — The post is a bullish call to buy into short interest, but it offers no stated fundamental reason for the short interest itself.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX shorts- try your best to bring it down to 170..” — The post is a price-targeted short call without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Down since the second of the post” — The item reports only a historical share-price move, which is explicitly neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX going red in T - 5 mins” — The item reports only a recent share-price move without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “send this down 150” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “march to $200” — The post asserts a bullish forward price target for SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “Anytime stocktwits is so bullsih, I'm bearish.” — The author expresses a bearish opinion by invoking contrarian sentiment on the social platform.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Never bet against elon” — The post expresses a bullish sentiment toward Elon Musk but does not provide a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX cover shorts cover.. once it cross 174, you won’t see it below 190 ever” — The post presents a bullish technical thesis that short-covering will drive a sustained price advance.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX please im just a poor beat, have mercy on me….” — The distressed plea is a generic social post that does not state a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “they are annihilating bears here” — The post describes a reported price move without stating a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “How many shorts just got trapped?” — The item is a speculative question about a short squeeze rather than a stated fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Bears are weak.” — The social post expresses a bullish opinion by characterizing bearish sentiment as weak.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Elon somewhere tweaking on a robot right now” — The item is a bare, non-company-specific observation about Elon Musk that does not state a substantive proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “NASA is close to announcing a bulk purchase of rocket launches to fuel its $30 billion drive to build a permanent base on the moon for humans to live and work.” — A prospective bulk NASA launch purchase would materially expand Redwire's lunar services opportunity.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX come on Elon show me them titties!” — The item is a target-specific social post, but it contains no substantive company proposition and only a price-blind observation of attention.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$80.00” — The item reports only a share price level with no company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “the week of dilution” — The post expresses strong skepticism that bullish sentiment is credible given an upcoming dilution event.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “funny bears popped out for a few seconds” — The item describes a brief bearish price reaction without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “moved up today and started to consolidate” — The item reports only a price move and consolidation, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “a few private placements to IPOs that have panned out lucratively ($SPCX being a banger)” — The user's private placement in SPCX is described as having performed lucratively.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX up or down from here?” — The item poses a neutral question about SPcx's price direction without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 🔥 🚀” — The item is only a bullish price reaction with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$SPCX Shorts ain’t about to hold overnight lol” — The post expresses a bullish view that short sellers will not maintain their positions.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “for the lowve of mega bottoms save bullsies!!!” — The post expresses a strongly bullish view that the stock is near a major bottom.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX $TSLA $AMD I'm not that strong a swimmer but I sure know how to pick my stock investments...” — The post mentions SPCX only as part of a generic investment-selection claim without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX - 7,291 views” — The item reports SPXC's view count as a neutral observation of investor attention.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Buying is picking up into the close.” — The item reports only a buying-pressure observation without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “strong close” — The item is a price-minded observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Red close is guaranteed!!!” — The item is a price-blind prediction of a closing move and contains no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX EZ block” — The item reports a share-price movement without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “She grabbed them all.” — The item reports a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “cant afford a good hairpiece or decent clothes” — The post asserts the company's shareholders cannot afford basic necessities, a strongly negative financial condition claim.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “filling the gap to 155. hopefully it holds around there.” — The item is a price-level observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX god candle!” — The item reports only a bullish price pattern without any underlying fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “This week looks brighter !!” — The post expresses an explicitly bullish outlook for the company.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “bull flag forming” — The item reports a technical price pattern without a stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “I am Bullish!” — The user's explicit bullish statement is a strong attributed forward opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “if we retail investors find a good stock after doing due diligence, and only after doing due diligence and watching a stock over a reasonable period of time, then let’s be helpful to each other and share our stock picks more often to let each other know and we will hopefully all benefit and rise as a strong force to be reckoned with against the larger institutional investors.” — The post expresses an optimistic view that disciplined retail investors can collectively benefit and grow strong.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “What do you think is gonna happen leading up to the share unlock on Friday” — The item speculates about share-price movement without stating a fundamental reason or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Guaranteed red close!!!! Get out now!!! You’re warned!!!!” — The post is an emphatic bearish call to exit, which is bullish sentiment from the perspective of a short thesis.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX back to 150 tomo” — The item reports only a share-price level and timing, which is a neutral observation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX opens at 115 tomorrow” — The item reports only an opening price observation with no fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “will there be a cover candle somewhere” — The post asks about a technical price pattern without stating a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$PENG VOLUME COMING>>>>>>>>EARNINGS TONIGHT.....STACKS ARE THE NEXT WAVE!!!!! $SMCI $HPE $DELL $SPCX” — The item is a bullish social post that mentions SPXC only as part of a list of stocks, without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “will be back stronger than ever” — The post expresses a strongly bullish forward opinion about the company's future performance.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “long term bullish” — The attributed long-term bullish view is a positive forward opinion on SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Delusion at its finest.” — The phrase is a strongly bullish attributed opinion that the company's situation is a delusion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “It says that the market is growing.” — The user presents market growth as a stated fact supporting a positive outlook.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX long term” — The post is a neutral, non-directional statement about long-term interest in SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “This is cheap compared to $SPCX” — The comparison is neutral and does not establish a directional valuation proposition for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “you would think all the retarded bears here would have learned their lesson with Tesla and missing out on that wealth multiplier” — The post attributes a missed opportunity to bearish investors, expressing a moderately bullish attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX worth 2.4 trillion” — The item reports an extreme share-price valuation observation without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX how much is the stock actually worth at current company valuation 4$ maybe 5$ at best.” — The attributed valuation opinion implies the current company valuation is excessively high.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “your great prediction didn't work out today” — The post reports a failed prediction about SPCX, which is a negative attributed opinion on the prediction's accuracy.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX red days tomorrow” — The item reports a future share-price movement without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX hold calls” — The post is a neutral observation of investor activity without a directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Nuke program “obliterated” last year, but nukes imminent. US Attacks.” — The post presents an escalating nuclear and attack scenario as a severe geopolitical risk.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I will choose hype stocks all day. With high stocks, there’s nothing to worry about. Wall Street love hype stocks any day. They hate fundamentals strong stocks” — The attributed preference concerns a general investment thesis rather than a specific proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Michael Burry warns a stock market crash is coming” — Burry's attributed warning is a strongly negative forward opinion about the broader market, not about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX day trade — $170 puts exp 10/09. In at $2.05, added and averaged down to $1.90. Reduced 1 contract at $2.35 for +23.68%, 20% target hit. Stop raised to $2.20, last contract still riding. Plan the trade, trade the plan.” — The item describes a trader's position management and execution plan for SPCX without stating a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “SpaceExplorationTechnologies Corp Chart Analysis” — The item is a neutral observation that a chart analysis exists for Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Space sector is only moving because of $SPCX 73 most likely overnight” — The item reports a share-price move without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX red close tomorrow confirms reversal” — The item reports a price move without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX perfect break and retest hold” — The item describes a technical price pattern without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “if that stop gets trigger your call wall 🧲 evaporates …. And an air pocket of -$5-10 awaits you.” — The attributed options thesis warns of a sharp adverse move if the call wall evaporates.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “it’s still green” — The item reports only a positive share-price observation without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.50 [social_text] “To all the newbie Musk investors.” — The item characterizes Musk investors as newbies, expressing a negative attributed opinion about them.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Friday $169 close” — The item reports a closing price without a substantive fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “another great day bulls....stock cooled down, accumulation and now ready for the next leg.” — The post presents a bullish technical thesis of accumulation and an anticipated next leg.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “we closed green baby!!!” — The item reports only a closing price move, which is explicitly price-blind and directionless.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “I can't take the buying seriously at thee prices.” — The investor expresses skepticism about the seriousness of buying at the stated price level.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Green in extended hours ?” — The item reports an extended-hours price observation without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 120 days of price discovery?” — The item is a price-focused observation without a stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “tomorrow is oct7.” — The item states only a date and contains no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX down 3-4 percent tomorrow” — The item reports only a price movement without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “I won’t start trimming till we get to $300” — The user's stated position to hold until a high target expresses a strongly bullish forward opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “you hit the tippy bottom” — The post describes a reported share-price extreme without stating a company-specific fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “will face selling pressure starting Oct 9” — The post forecasts a negative price reaction for SPCX beginning on a specific date.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “a $300 target won’t be enough to keep share price this high” — The author's target implies the current share price is overvalued.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Entering in at $108 was a great move” — The item is a price-entry observation with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Bull flag on the daily, worth keeping on your radar.” — The author identifies a bullish daily technical pattern and expresses a positive view on SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “SpaceX disclosed that in 2025 it purchased about $131 million worth of Cybertrucks from Tesla at MSRP.” — SpaceX's substantial Cybertruck purchase supports Tesla's vehicle demand and pricing.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “It also bought $506 million of Tesla Megapacks.” — SpaceX's large Megapack purchase supports Tesla's energy-storage demand.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Rocket Lab Just Gained 17% in a Month” — The item reports Rocket Lab's share-price movement without providing any company-specific fundamental proposition for SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “1.5T+ of the existing 2.2-2.3T valuation inst already purely speculative.” — The attributed view treats a large portion of SpaceX's valuation as purely speculative.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “200ish very soon.” — The item is a price target observation without a stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX retards fuels this rally….” — The item reports a positive price move without stating a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX tomorrow under $170” — This is a price-level prediction without a stated fundamental or attributed opinion to score.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX https://www.tipranks.com/news/spacex-stock-spcx-climbs-almost-2-ahead-of-a-nasa-livestream-this-week” — The item reports only a share-price move ahead of an event, which is neutral under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “More launches tomorrow!!” — The post indicates additional product launches are scheduled, which is a positive product-development proposition.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “you know the insiders and know that they’re selling? Even when they didn’t sell the first time?” — The post asserts that insiders are selling, which is a negative attributed view on the company.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I'm waiting on the launch pad.” — The post expresses anticipation for a launch but states no directional fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$185+ EOW” — The item reports only a share-price target without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX reversal here we go” — The item is only a price-reversal observation with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “If stock went from 220 to 104” — The item reports only a historical share-price move, which is explicitly neutral.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$SPCX 180+ minimum tomorrow. 186 possible.” — The post sets an explicit bullish price target for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “we gonna scalp this for 15%” — The post expresses speculative trading intent rather than a fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [news] “SpaceX is seeking to raise $40 bln in an endeavor led by Apollo Global to buy Nvidia chips”
— The reported financing and acquisition are neutral company observations without a stated directional outcome.SpaceX seeks to raise $40 bln to buy Nvidia chips- FT +0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX tried telling them pumpers tricks” — The post asserts that SPXC is outsmarting pumpers, a strongly bullish attributed social opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$SPCX to borrow $40 Billion to buy $NVDA Chips” — The attributed thesis frames a massive debt-financed acquisition as a severe financial risk.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX will be bloody today” — The item is a price prediction with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion to score.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “if it dips I buy some chips. If it rips I take a sip😎” — The item is a price-blind trading plan about SPCX's share movement rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX getting a 20% haircut by Friday” — The item reports only a price move without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “another bear h forming with initial measured move to 167.2” — The described bearish chart pattern is a technical price observation and carries no directional sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$AAPL $SPCX $SPY blocking this shithole” — The post is a negative, non-fundamental social observation that does not establish a scorable company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “I think I found your path to 200 but its not without revisiting 148-150 breakout ceiling for a retest” — The author presents a bullish technical model forecasting a retest and eventual advance to $200.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “he don’t lose” — The post asserts a strongly bullish forward opinion that Elon's position will not lose.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX” — The mention is a bare ticker reference without any substantive proposition about SPcx.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “SpaceX Is Borrowing $40B For Nvidia Chips” — The item reports SpaceX's financing for Nvidia chips but offers no directional judgment on the transaction's impact.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “This issue was from December 2024” — The item's only company-specific proposition is a neutral observation that a referenced issue is old.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX $133” — The item reports a share price level without stating a fundamental reason or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$SPCX MERIKA
Suckers!” — The post's hostile framing is a bullish attributed opinion about Merika.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “they're buying good chips right.” — The post attributes a positive supply-side proposition to SPCX's chip purchases.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Got caught at this price when it IPO. So I guess I am at my buy in point since I didn't sell yet.” — The post is a neutral observation of the author's IPO purchase position and current price, without a scorable company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “stock split will come sooner than most people expected. Will happen around 2027 year end to 2028 first half, stock price around $600 more or less.” — The attributed expectation describes a future split and price level without stating a fundamental benefit or cost to SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX then 300$” — The item reports only a share-price observation with no company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX under $150 eow” — The item reports only a price level without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 186$” — The item reports only a share price level without any fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this spcx run up from 110 to 170” — The item reports SPX's price movement without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “time to explore the bottom of the ocean” — The item is a price-blind observation of SPcx's share price without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX $180 EOD” — The item reports only a closing price level for SPCX, which is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Will buy again when it dip to 162.” — The item is a price-blind observation of a stated share-price level and intended re-entry, which carries no directional sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “bulls at $SMCI think this is good for them.” — The author attributes a bullish view to SMCI bulls, which is a scorable attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “as serious analysts have said - based on the future of the company it's cheap.” — The attributed analyst view is a positive forward valuation opinion on the company.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “why borrow money after IPO?” — The attributed argument that the company's post-IPO borrowing reflects excessive greed is a negative forward opinion on management.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “You can help make the world a better place. When you see an EDS/TDS America hating bear, hit the block button.” — The post urges users to block bearish sentiment, indicating a positive social-opinion stance toward SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “Such “terrible” news and only down 2%??” — The user's characterization of the news as terrible is a negative attributed opinion, while the reported move is neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX bears r pumped this morning…” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I wonder if people on this board are bots from India” — The post questions the authenticity of the discussion board's participants rather than expressing a substantive view on SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “the moron who dont understand the trillionaire status isn’t liquid” — The post characterizes investors as irrational and liquidation-prone, expressing a strongly negative attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “morons who think this is bad news are about to learn a lesson.” — The author explicitly argues that the item is not bad news and that opposing views will be proven wrong.
stocktwits
-0.90 [social_text] “useless company” — The post makes an explicitly negative qualitative assessment of the company.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “see ya at 120$ soon” — The user's prediction of a future price is a strongly bullish attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I’ll take 164” — The item is only a price-level observation with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX looks like $150.00” — The item is a price-level observation without a stated fundamental reason or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “You are just a plain old idiot then.” — The item is a hostile, unattributed personal attack that expresses strongly negative sentiment toward SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “After Q3 earnings, potentially ~1.3B more shares become eligible.
Dec 8: remaining standard 180-day lockup expires.” — The disclosed unlock schedule creates a substantial potential increase in available shares.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX Wisdom is a Bear” — The named user explicitly expresses a bearish opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “You should sell now.” — The author's explicit advice to sell is a bullish attributed opinion on the near-term price direction.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “$SPCX stupid fu king stick” — The item is an explicitly hostile social post about SPCX with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX smell this!!” — The item is a bare, unsubstantiated observation about SPCX that conveys no directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “i can smell the 200” — The post is a price-based technical observation with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Buying dips” — The item is a price-blind observation of share-price behavior without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Watch that become a billion dollar company. Invest in FTC for the 10X” — The author presents an explicit bullish valuation thesis for Filtronic.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “the amount of capex this company is spending will never return” — The attributed thesis asserts that the company's capital spending will never recover.
stocktwits
-0.75 [social_text] “The company is reportedly seeking roughly $40 billion in fresh debt financing, including about $10 billion in bank loans and $30 billion in bonds, largely to fund its enormous AI infrastructure ambitions.” — The proposed debt financing substantially increases leverage and refinancing risk for SpaceX.
stocktwits
-0.65 [social_text] “Massive spending on AI chips and infrastructure must eventually translate into equally massive cash flows to justify today’s valuation.” — Extreme capital intensity creates a demanding cash-flow requirement to justify the valuation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 168.80 gone. 161 possible.” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Elon could buy smci twice for that much money” — The attributed opinion implies the cited amount is far below SMCI's fair value.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 1️⃣5️⃣0️⃣” — The item reports only a share-price level without any company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$SPCX wants about $10B in bank loans and $30B in debt, led by $APO, to fund a large $NVDA AI chip order.” — A large planned NVIDIA chip order indicates strong demand for SpaceX's launch services.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “Pumped it to issue more debt.” — The attributed motive to issue more debt is a negative capital-structure proposition for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “175 tomorrow?” — The user expresses a bullish expectation that SPCX will reach a specific price target.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX
What???
Hahahaha” — The post is a bare, non-directional reaction to SPCX that records investor attention without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Loving the move so far” — The item expresses enthusiasm about SPX's reported price movement, which is neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Over Sold” — The item is a price-based observation with no stated fundamental reason for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 167-157-170-200😁” — The item reports only a price range without a stated fundamental reason or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “this should be at 157 topps and that’s generous” — The author's stated valuation target and characterization of it as generous form a bullish attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Buy Puts; Be a Man!” — The call to buy put options is a bearish attributed trading opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [news] “SpaceX (NASDAQ:SPCX) is seeking $40 billion in financing for purchases of Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) artificial intelligence chips”
— The need to raise $40 billion to purchase Nvidia chips indicates substantial financing pressure and execution risk for SpaceX.SpaceX Seeks $40 Billion Financing for Nvidia Chips, FT Reports +0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX going green today 😉” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “I’m waiting for midterms and the investigations, then I’ll be shorting” — The author's stated plan to short after the events forms a negative attributed investment thesis.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX remains on my radar” — The post indicates the investor is monitoring SPCX but offers no directional company-specific opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “After flushing down to an early pre-market low of $167.76, a massive surge in volume quickly swept the order book.” — The item describes only a pre-market price and volume move, which is a neutral observation under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX remains on my radar” — The item states that SPCX is being watched, but provides no directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX F U Bears” — The post expresses a strongly bearish social opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “This got above the 50 finally weeks ago and every time it sold off it just tested it and bounced off of it.” — The user presents a bullish technical thesis that SPCX has repeatedly tested and rebounded from the 50-day moving average.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$SPCX $NBIS yikes! About to get ugly” — The post expresses a strongly negative social reaction to SPCX, though it also mentions NBIS.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “price target raised to $173 from $144 at Susquehanna” — Susquehanna's higher price target is a moderately bullish attributed analyst opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “The future is 155.22” — The author's explicit prediction of a specific future price is a strongly bullish attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “that was fun now 200” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX buyer at 110” — A reported purchase price is a neutral share-price observation with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 2 Trillion cal but asking penny loan…???” — The item is a substantive social observation about SPCX's valuation and financing terms, but it contains no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Time to sell. This is going down hard.” — The post expresses a strongly bearish attributed opinion that the stock should be sold and is falling.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I think this is the next scenery.” — The item is a bare, non-specific comparison that does not establish a scorable proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Three outside up Bullish reversal pattern. Gap just filled & it's ready to rally. Lovely big Bull flag just gave a good entry before Launch.” — The item presents a bullish technical pattern and a favorable entry signal for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX Awesome!” — The item is a generic positive reaction to SPCX without a substantive company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Watch this go green on opening” — The item is a price prediction about SPCX's opening move, which is a neutral observation under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX up over 17% from last week and only down 2% today” — The item reports only share-price movements, which are explicitly price-blind observations.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “it pumped 34 cents and since down $9 from yesterdays high” — The item reports only a recent share-price move, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “$SPCX looks for $40 billion debt to buy chips.” — A proposed $40 billion debt-financed acquisition is a material financial undertaking with material downside risk.
stocktwits
-0.90 [social_text] “Today was your 911, and I pray for the ones lost and the family's that also suffered.” — The post expresses strong antisemitic sentiment by invoking the September 11 attacks as a Jewish tragedy.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “The 40 billion is all debt so its riding on earnings and SpaceX being able to pay it back” — The author presents SpaceX's ability to repay $40B of debt as a fundamental risk tied to earnings.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “buying the dip” — The item describes a price reaction without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “Company not making money...” — The post asserts that SPCX is unprofitable, a strongly negative profitability proposition.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “$SPCX 40 bills is chump change to Jensen.” — The attributed view that the acquisition cost is trivially low is a moderately positive forward opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “people are buying the dip” — Buying a dip is a price-reaction observation with no stated fundamental direction for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$SPCX bullish” — The post expresses a bullish opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.50 [social_text] “SpaceX is reportedly seeking $40 billion in financing to buy more Nvidia chips for Al infrastructure” — The reported financing requirement for Nvidia chip purchases indicates a substantial capital need tied to infrastructure expansion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “a typical of a moronic bear who thinks all chips are same chips” — The user's dismissive characterization is an attributed bearish opinion on the semiconductor industry's differentiation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “right at open” — The item is only a price-at-open observation with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Space x wants to sell 40B of debt and probably will dilute you bulls again.” — The author presents a large debt sale and likely dilution as a negative capital-structure proposition.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “already has to borrow 40Bill just for chips” — The attributed thesis that chip purchases require substantial borrowing indicates material working-capital pressure.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX current reverse traffic. 200 day on top” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “red is temporary, by 10:30 am EST it will turn GREEN” — The item is a price prediction without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX no surprise red today…” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “LETS MAKE PUTS GREAT AGAIN” — The post explicitly advocates bearish put options on SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX picking up dips” — The item describes only a share-price reaction without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [news] “SpaceX (SPCX) is seeking to issue $40 billion in new debt to purchase Nvidia (NVDA) chips”
— The item reports a large planned Nvidia chip purchase but provides no stated financial impact or strategic assessment of that procurement.Elon Musk's SpaceX seeking to raise $40B to buy Nvidia chips -0.60 [news] “SpaceX Corp (NASDAQ:SPCX), Elon Musk’s rocket and artificial intelligence (AI) company, is seeking $40 billion in financing to buy Nvidia chips, potentially creating one of the largest debt-funded AI hardware purchases.”
— The proposed financing is large and debt-funded, introducing substantial leverage and execution risk to SpaceX's AI hardware strategy.SpaceX seeks $40 billion financing to buy Nvidia AI chips +0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 165 by close easy. Can even go below 160 back to 150s had a nice little run” — The item is a price-level forecast and historical move description with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “clean sweep to the low and rip up” — The item describes only a reported share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX in red” — The item reports only a price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Bulls, who cares, keep buying!!!” — The post expresses bullish conviction and continued buying interest in SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “here comes new lows” — The item reports a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Google's key cybersecurity partner SentinelOne(S) remains extremely undervalued compared to peer group companies” — The item presents a strong attributed valuation opinion comparing SentinelOne to its peers.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX PUTSSSS PUTTTTTS PPPPPUT” — The repeated bearish language expresses a strongly negative social sentiment view of SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX ...what the fuk...” — The item is a bare, nonsensical mention of SPCX without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “I don’t worry about red days.” — The user's stated indifference to down days is a positive attributed sentiment about their own investment outlook.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “use an FA so you don't lose all your monies” — The post warns that trading SPCX without financial advice carries a high risk of total loss.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “The people who bought this stock above $135 and are giving financial advice on this stock need to self reflect… Calm the ego… Read some financial literature” — The post criticizes investors who bought above $135 and are offering financial advice, implying their judgment is flawed.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “load the puts!” — The call to load puts expresses a bearish social opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “about to be a false breakout” — The post presents a bearish technical thesis that the anticipated breakout is likely to fail.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Bull cycle about to start!!!” — The post expresses a strongly bullish forward opinion about Bitcoin, not about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Wild ride up and down..” — The item describes only SPCX's reported price volatility without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX rebuy at 150” — The item is only a price-reentry observation with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “this is bullish AF for the 3” — The author explicitly expresses a strongly bullish opinion on SpaceX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “that was the market dick for the day….. i mean dip.” — The item is a price-focused observation with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “The institutional derisking prior to lockup expiration hasnt started yet.” — The attributed institutional derisking before lockup expiration is a negative forward expectation for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “My money is ready to buy give me a good price!!!!!” — The post expresses readiness to buy but does not state a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “holding that short from $150” — The post characterizes the short position as a losing trade, indicating a negative attributed opinion on the short's performance.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “They're running the markets up” — The item reports a general market move without a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “if this wasnt an elon musk company itd be down 8-10% right now” — The attributed thesis is that the company's valuation is materially supported by its association with Elon Musk.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “the sell off will happen quick” — The user predicts a rapid sell-off, presenting a bearish short-term trading outlook.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “holding extremely well on a terrible red day” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “these people probably don’t even understand earnings or profitability” — The attributed opinion claims the referenced group lacks understanding of SPCX's earnings and profitability.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$2,371.22 target” — The item states a target price but provides no directional analyst opinion or thesis to score.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “they want you to hit a price AND a time” — The post expresses skepticism about the feasibility of meeting a stated price-and-time target.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Watching Bears run wild for half a day” — The item describes a short-term bearish price move without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX not bad move” — The item is a neutral observation of the stock's move without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “Only a cultist would buy this.” — The post asserts that buying SPCX is irrational, presenting a strongly negative attributed investment thesis.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “This will fall back below $104.oo in November/December…Guaranteed!” — The attributed forecast predicts a material decline in SPCX's share price.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Bears pushing hard. A sign of fear and insecurity.” — The post characterizes bearish pressure as driven by fear and insecurity, a negative attributed sentiment about the company.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “These employees were given this for pennies” — The post characterizes employee share grants as having been made at very low cost, implying a negative view of the ownership structure.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Elon Musk owns 6.42 billion shares of SpaceX. Every penny represents $64,200,000.00” — The disclosed shareholding is a neutral company fact without a stated directional opinion.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “Their real product is duping fools to buy so they can dilute more and issue bonds.” — The attributed thesis alleges deceptive financing and dilution as the company's primary purpose.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX FOMO fever …how’s that usually end…ha” — The post is a price-blind observation of speculative attention rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX **$195” — The item reports only a share price level with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “320 million share dilution FRIDAY” — The disclosed share dilution is a strongly negative capital-structure proposition.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “bears thought they struck gold and were gonna make millions off puts printing....lmaooooo” — The post mocks bearish put speculation as unfounded, presenting a negative attributed opinion about that bearish thesis.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “This baby is popping now… Come back city watch my $181.50 hit by Friday. It’s going to be a rock in two days.” — The item is a bullish prediction about SPCX's share price, which is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “they’ll drop this 6 bucks in an instance” — The item is a price prediction without a stated fundamental or attributed opinion to score.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$175 coming in!!!!” — The item reports only a share-price target without a stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX BULLISH!!!!!!” — The post is an explicitly bullish attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “added more to my $185 $SPCX calls at $.11” — The user's additional purchase of $185 call options expresses a bullish opinion on SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX and $NVDA $$$$$” — The item is only a bare mention of SPCX paired with a price-movement-style expression, providing no scorable company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX i knew i should have bough $LOFD yesterday!” — The post is a price-blind reflection on a missed trade, not a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “the more money a company loses the higher valuation it should have” — The user advances a bullish valuation thesis that higher losses should correspond to higher valuation.
stocktwits
+0.60 [news] “SpaceX is seeking $40 billion in debt financing to buy Nvidia chips”
— The large debt raise is intended to fund Nvidia chip purchases, indicating strong demand for SpaceX's services.SpaceX is going on a bond binge +0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX breaks165” — Breaking a price level is a reported price movement and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “house of pain is about to begin bulls” — The post expresses a bullish social-market opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Back to $120” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX closed 2/3 of my short.” — The item reports a partial short-covering result without stating a directional fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “time for correction” — The post predicts a price correction, which is a neutral price observation under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX should’ve brought more puts fk” — The post expresses a strongly negative attributed opinion that the stock should have been hedged more heavily.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$150 or lower” — The item reports a share-price level without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “My guess is 150 by Friday” — The user's forecast that the stock will reach 150 is a bullish forward price opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX garbage” — The post expresses a strongly negative attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “whole bullish on a $2 stock” — The post expresses a strongly bullish social opinion about SPCX's valuation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Whole market is a bloodbath.” — The item expresses a broad market view without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 167.10 long” — The post is a trader's long position at a specific price and contains no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “the only thing good about trump and elon getting away with scamming is the ones getting scammed are their biggest fans” — The post characterizes SPCX investors as being scammed, expressing strongly negative sentiment toward the company.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX $TSLA
No one left to fake-buy Tesler CyberTurds.” — The item is a social post mentioning SPCX only as a ticker alongside Tesla, without a substantive company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “watch $SPCX 167” — The item reports a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Finally selling off.. took forever jeez. Fresh lows” — The item reports only a share-price decline and fresh low, which is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this is a cool off after the run we had” — The item describes only a post-run price pullback without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “If I were him would prefer to debt as well at a tiny cost of 10% annual interest or less, which would be far better for the business.” — The attributed investor opinion favors debt financing as beneficial for the business.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “REMEMBER FOLKS YOU CANT SPELL FELON WITHOUT ELON” — The post attributes a negative character judgment to Elon Musk, which is the only substantive proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “SpaceX’s corporate bonds are officially rated investment-grade (BBB) by major agencies” — A major investment-grade rating is a positive attributed credit assessment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Im selling cash secured PUTs at 155 to 160 for 16th.” — The post describes a personal options strategy without stating a directional opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX Options premium burn.” — The item reports a neutral options-market observation without a directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “they will price in the unlocked shares tomorrow” — The item reports a future share-pricing event without stating a directional fundamental impact.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “I want answers.” — The post expresses a demand for disclosure without stating a specific company proposition.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Short-sellers who aggressively pressed the $40 billion Nvidia chip debt narrative” — The attributed short thesis treats the Nvidia chip debt as a material concern.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this beauty is not even down 3” — The item reports only relative share-price movement, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX puts are still on sale!” — The put-sale remark is a price-related observation without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “New low coming” — The item is a price prediction with no stated fundamental reason for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “A little backfilling, green by EOD.” — The item reports only a neutral share-price observation with no scorable company fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX dang yall are some touchy mfers. It isn’t that deep 😂” — The post is a generic, non-substantive reaction to investor sentiment rather than a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX Going up…” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX your a idiot. You have no concept what space x is about. Get educated before you post dumb shit” — The post is an aggressive, hostile attack on the investor's understanding of SpaceX rather than a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I sold my $SPCX early too” — The item reports a personal trading action without stating a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX could easily make it back to 170 today.” — The item is a price-level forecast and therefore carries no directional sentiment under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Such a disgraceful stock market” — The user's condemnation is a general market sentiment statement and does not bear on SPCX specifically.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX has bounced!” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Its down $4.” — The item reports a share-price move without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “it’s the first time as a bull I don’t mind this taking a massive dip” — The user's bullish stance and lack of concern about a decline express a positive attributed investor opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX this is some WILD SPECULATION, so far OTM.” — The post describes speculative trading activity without stating a substantive fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Institutional buyers continue to absorb” — The item presents an attributed bullish view that institutions are accumulating shares.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX has bounced off the new bottom.” — The item reports only a share-price rebound without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Time to get back on track!” — The item is a price-blind observation of SPCX's implied share movement without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “they all switched to bears now probably” — The post attributes a recent shift from bullish to bearish sentiment among traders.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$AMC $SPCX bro on here bashing spcx while being all in on amc” — The post is a social observation about investor attention to SPCX, not a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX I don’t argue with Ives 😂 🚀” — The post is a brief, non-directional reaction to an attributed opinion and does not present a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “Still extremely over valued garbage welfare stock.” — The author explicitly characterizes the company as extremely overvalued.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “TECHNICALS LOOK GREAT. NICE BOUNCE OF $20PTS run” — The author offers a positive technical assessment of SPCX's recent move and outlook.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX back to 140’s” — The item reports only a share-price level without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “SpaceX Could Help Create ‘Millions’ Of Jobs” — Morgan Stanley's thesis that SpaceX could create millions of jobs is a strongly positive attributed employment outlook.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the chart today isn’t pretty today but good news is the dips are being bought” — The item describes a price pattern and buying activity without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Bounced on 15 min chart scalpers
They gonna get fleeced” — The attributed scalper thesis is a bearish technical argument about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX bought back in… let’s goooooo” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this just the market” — The post speculates about market movement without stating a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “imagine if we close green” — The item is only a hypothetical observation of a possible share-price move, which is neutral under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
-0.90 [social_text] “ridiculous how this is still be propped up. Scam scam scam” — The user's repeated accusation that the stock is artificially supported and a scam is a strongly negative attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX range is 170-163.50 for now” — The item reports only a price range without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX closing near lod is not good” — The item reports a limit-down price observation without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “only holding puts now” — The user's stated put-only position expresses a bearish opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Two Geavestone doji closes in a row- yesterday- today.” — The consecutive doji closes are a reported technical price pattern with no stated fundamental direction.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I did close short 165.69” — The closed short is a reported trading observation without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “No short is covering at these levels” — The post is a price-level observation without a stated fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “God candle 😂 2.8 million shares were sold in I second” — The item describes a large share-price move without a scorable underlying reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “A little more on the nose than I was expecting.” — The item reports a share-price move without a scorable underlying reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX keeps rejecting $168” — The item reports only a price-level rejection without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX ouch” — The item is a brief, target-specific reaction to a price move and contains no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Do you understand how stock prices and valuations work?” — The item poses a generic question about stock prices and valuations without stating any specific SPXC proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “In at 165.5” — The post records a single share-price entry without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX $TSLA You will own nothing and be happy” — The item is a bare price-related mention of SPCX without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Already priced in you Bannana, well do just fine dont u worry” — The post expresses a confident bullish opinion that SPCX is well-positioned.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX we going 200 no worries . Eventually the same price as tsla .” — The post expresses a strongly bullish forward price target for SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “nasty little bull trap to end the day before the real pain tomorrow” — The item characterizes the day's action as a bull trap and warns of further downside.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “how you bulls do Friday when 54 billion is needed to keep it flat” — The post expresses a bullish expectation that bulls can sustain the share price despite a large required inflow.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$QQQ $SPCX out with good gain” — The item reports a positive share-price move without a scorable company-specific reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 1.5 million buy market on close” — The reported buy-market volume is a neutral price-activity observation with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Buyers coming into 4pm close” — The item reports only a buying observation at close without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX wtf was that lol” — The post is a reactive, non-fundamental observation about SPCX's recent activity.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “Later tranches (such as the ~319 million share unlock in August) did see downward pressure, causing the stock to slip” — Later share unlocks are attributed with downward price pressure and a resulting slip.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SMCI fake news with $SPCX” — The item is a bare association between two companies without a substantive proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “if it dips to $160 again” — The item is only a conditional observation of share-price movement, which is neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Stop looking at where you came from in july. Start looking where you were june 17” — The item is a price-focused observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Great business going forward and great material news non-stop.” — The user expresses a strongly positive forward view of the business and ongoing material developments.
stocktwits
-0.90 [social_text] “this overvalued garbage” — The attributed short thesis characterizes SPCX as severely overvalued.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Yorkville Ives Maintains Outperform on SpaceX, $225 PT” — The maintained Outperform rating and $225 price target are a positive attributed analyst opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Nice trading world out there” — The item offers a neutral observation about the trading environment without a scorable company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Just look t that lovely cup pattern heading for a hard rally tomorrow!” — The cited cup pattern is a technical price pattern, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I’ll take the $1,500 profit and be done lol .” — The item reports a realized profit from share price movement, which is explicitly price-blind and carries no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “RSI bounce off 60-55 is when I go heavy” — The item is a price-blind technical observation rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “good news is holding up” — The item reports a price observation without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “institutions pump was a good enough sign for me to book profit” — The investor treats institutional buying as a positive signal for the company.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “I see $5 plus tomorrow!” — The user's prediction is a strongly bullish forward price opinion.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “this has no chance to go up from here…only down 145 till next ER then shit the bed…” — The user expresses a strongly bearish view of the stock's near-term price path.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Theres always a selloff right before an unlock date” — The item reports a historical share-price pattern without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$TSLA $SPCX $NVDA $META” — The post is a generic social mention of multiple companies without a substantive proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “I think you are right. I though he was telling $SPCX people that $ASTS was going to 170.” — The attributed view that ASTS will reach $170 is a strongly bullish forward price opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX nasty candle at the end of day” — The described candle is a reported price movement and carries no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The fact that the price holds tight right at $167.59 / $167.60 into the final hour of trading means the structural selling pressure has officially maxed out.” — The item is a technical price observation without a stated fundamental or attributed directional opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “large institutional dark-pool algorithms step-by-step absorbed that multi-million share block right at $167.60” — The attributed institutional absorption of a large insider block is a positive attributed market opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX R.I.P. 🐻🔫” — The post expresses strongly bearish sentiment toward SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “head and shoulders looks nice and juicy” — The item describes a technical price pattern without a stated fundamental or attributed directional opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “today movement is golden” — The item is a price-blind observation of the day's share movement with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX go down please” — The post is a price-blind request for a downward move and contains no fundamental or attributed-opinion proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The live chart was entertaining to watch the last 15 minutes.” — The item describes only a recent share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.80 [news] “SpaceX: A Great Company Priced For A Future It Hasn't Built Yet
Space Exploration Technologies Corp. is rated a Sell, citing a $2.33 trillion valuation and a 12-month target of $110.”
— The attributed Sell rating and valuation-based thesis form a strongly negative analyst opinion.SpaceX: A Great Company Priced For A Future It Hasn't Built Yet +0.00 [social_text] “Parabolic run on ticker GMEX now guys!!” — The post is about GMEX, not SPCX, and the incidental ticker mention provides no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 🚀” — The rocket emoji is a conventional bullish reaction to a reported price move, which is neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX TSLA still bouncing harder than SPCX thats apparent” — The comparison describes Tesla's relative share-price movement, which is a price observation and not scorable sentiment.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “Consumer sentiment has to be pretty low Im assuming” — The user's assumption is a negative forward opinion about consumer sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX is bouncing back!” — The item reports only a share-price recovery without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Market is moving to GMEX now” — The item is a price-blind social post that mentions SPCX only as an incidental ticker alongside others.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “I’m gonna laugh at you for what’s to come!!!!” — The post expresses a strongly bullish forward opinion about SPCX's future performance.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Please Cramer.. don’t say anything stupid about SPCX” — This is a request to avoid commentary rather than a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “unlock of 340 million shares coming Friday” — The share unlock is a neutral company observation without a stated directional impact.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Get ready for more of this tomorrow” — The item predicts further share-price movement without stating a fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Continued momentum from recent space-tourism/satellite launch news keeping speculative interest alive.” — The item reports continued speculative interest but does not state a directional fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Parabolic run on ticker GMEX now guys!!” — The item promotes GMEX and only incidentally lists SPCX without any company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX still going back to $200” — The item is a price-target prediction, which is a historical share-price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “Release of 7% tranche(~ 340 million shares)” — The planned release of a large share tranche is a dilution event that bears negatively on existing shareholders.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX investing in a pedo that was thinking about partying on Epsteins island is not a good idea” — The post expresses a strongly negative attributed opinion about SPCX's investment decision.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX retest of 170 and then into share unlock” — The item reports only a share-price retest and a share-unlock event, which are neutral observations.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “that beautiful dip!!!” — The post describes a share-price decline without stating a company-specific fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “a red day where we’re still at 168” — The item reports a price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Big Beautiful Bill will send this to $500 by 2029.” — The post makes an explicitly bullish forward forecast for SPCX tied to a policy initiative.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “we’re going up again” — The item is a price-based technical observation with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX just made $NVDA bankroll!” — The item reports a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “a drop under $160 tomorrow and Friday” — The item is a price-based forecast with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “Glad you finally joined the rest of us.” — The post expresses a positive attributed opinion about the investor's decision to join the community.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I’m up about $620% on $RKLB, 55% on $SPCX” — The reported share-price move is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Broadcom, Oracle And SpaceX Tap Private Credit For AI Hardware” — The report states SpaceX obtained private credit for AI hardware, but gives no company-specific financial or operational result.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “SpaceX is the dominator.” — The post asserts SpaceX's dominant market position as a strong positive fundamental proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “⬇️” — The item reports a share-price decline without stating a company-specific fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “feels like a jam job in rue” — The post expresses a strongly negative attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “SpaceX credit-risk indicators hit a record high” — Record-high credit-risk indicators indicate severe deterioration in SpaceX's creditworthiness.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “market cap is irrelevant” — The author's claim that market cap is irrelevant is a general investment thesis that does not provide a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX Green…let’s go!” — The item is only a bullish price reaction with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX put wall at 135, see you there by end of week.” — The item is a price-level prediction with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion to score.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “when the 100 year recession happens and the us debt defaults” — The post presents a severe, speculative macro scenario that frames the middle class as unable to fund the company's projects.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX just cracked that $150 level that's been support, then resistance, since its IPO.” — The item reports a share-price technical break without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “these ultra low levels” — The post is a price-blind observation of an extremely low share-price level without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “we can buy it at 70 soon though” — The post expresses a bullish attributed opinion that the stock is approachable near $70.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “a buying surge at open to 175” — The item is a price-based expectation without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Fighting to go Green!” — The item describes a price struggle without stating a fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “163 is on deck” — The item presents a bearish technical scenario in which a lower level is expected to be tested.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “finally red.” — The item reports only a share-price color change, which is a neutral observation.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “let’s all tell him that he’s a loser and he was wrong” — The post attributes a strongly negative judgment to management's stated position.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “the Cramer kiss of death” — The attributed phrase expresses a strongly bearish opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “tomorrow opens above 170 and closes around 175” — The item is a price prediction and contains no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$3” — The item reports only a share price level with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Why trust a guy who scams you into buying property on Mars?” — The post asserts that Elon Musk is a scammer, casting strong negative doubt on his credibility.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX sucked all the liquidity and left the meme stocks in shambles.” — The attributed social thesis alleges SPXCX drained liquidity and damaged other meme stocks.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “SEE YOU AT 135 BY END OF WEEK” — The author sets an explicit bullish price target for SpaceX within the week.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “the bears here never stop to amuse me” — The post expresses a bullish opinion about bearish sentiment, but the bullishness is attributed to the author's view rather than a company fundamental.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “rock drop in minutes” — The item describes a short-term share-price decline without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX low 150s by close tomorrow” — The item is a price prediction without a stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Yesterdays earnings confirmed at least bull case.” — The author's bullish thesis is attributed to the earnings result.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “waterfall to 130s......” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX it’s over !!!!” — The item is a bare, undirected social reaction to SPCX with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX seriously bulls” — The post expresses a strongly bullish social-market opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX red as reps.” — The item reports a share-price move without a scorable company-specific reason.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Abandoned Baby on a Bullish Harami Cross” — The named candle pattern is a bullish technical signal.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “This is going to Breakout again. Buy the dip! Trade the charts, play the set ups, skate to where the puck is going.” — The post presents a bullish technical thesis and trading call for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “And we’re green!” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “bulls can only hope it will squeeze more” — The post expresses a bullish expectation that SPCX will be the subject of a short squeeze.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “this will be good as long term investment” — The user expresses a positive forward-looking investment opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Elon makes them a LOT of money.” — The item states Elon generates substantial revenue for SPCX, a positive business proposition.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “massive institutional order blocks quietly accumulating global aerospace and defense real estate at the bottom of every minor index dip” — The attributed observation of large institutional accumulation at dips is a strongly bullish fundamental proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “And so am I !” — The post is a neutral confirmation of the investor's own participation, not a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 5$ flush soon?” — The item is a speculative question about a potential share-price move and contains no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 160p” — The item reports a share price move without any stated fundamental reason or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX this seriously could Not have been any more obvious!! Wow” — The post is an emphatic but directionless reaction to SPcx without a stated company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “about 300 million shares unlock tomorrow” — The post presents an expected share unlock as a neutral company observation without a directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the stock don’t agree with the crown by dumping $TSLA” — The item reports SPCX's share-price movement without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Pulling back for 3 days now on new $40B debt” — The author attributes the recent pullback to a large new debt issuance, a negative capital-structure development.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX could be a good swing trade.” — The item is a price-blind trading observation rather than a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “lost this $SPCX . -20 cents” — The item reports only a small share-price move without a scorable company-specific reason.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$SPCX every unlock is going to be a disaster according to bears.” — The attributed bearish thesis predicts adverse outcomes from future equity unlocks.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$SPCX need to pray to lord elon harder.” — The post expresses a strongly negative, dependent view of SPCX's prospects.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX stocks go up and down. It's just cooling down for few days.” — The item describes only SPX's share-price movement without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “they said Elon is full of shite” — The post attributes a strongly negative opinion to a source about Elon Musk's credibility.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I need more in the 50s” — The user's price target is a neutral observation of share-price movement, not a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “If you’re a long term holder you should probably be fine” — The author offers a cautiously positive forward-looking view for long-term holders.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX broke 165” — The item reports only a share-price level and a price prediction, which are neutral observations under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Keep shorting.It is going to $160 today” — The post advances a bearish short thesis by asserting a specific near-term price target.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “commence flush” — The item reports a share-price move without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “long $SPCX 165” — The item is a price-specific long position, which is a neutral observation rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX support $160 🔔 or $150 next week” — The item identifies only support levels, which is a price observation without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX this sucks” — The post expresses a strongly negative opinion about the company.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$160 is the new support ?” — The item reports a technical support level without a directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX once $165 breaks....” — The item is only a conditional price-level observation with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “What a rejection from VWAP” — The item describes VWAP-based price action without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Moved all my SpaceX short profit (via SNK) to XRP and XXRP.” — The item reports a neutral transfer of a position; the underlying SpaceX short is not substantively addressed.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX Is that what you have learned in the 90 day probation period on ST?” — This is a rhetorical question about SPcx's investor attention that does not state a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “no shorty is daring to short at this price” — The post asserts that the share price is so high that shorting is perceived as impossible, a bullish attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “the ppl who own the majority of this stock are buying at these lvls instead of selling” — The attributed view that majority shareholders are buying rather than selling is a strongly negative opinion about the company's ownership behavior.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “still way too soon.” — The post cautions that the current moment is too early for the investment.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “The investment gods are giving us another opportunity to load up!!” — The post expresses a strongly bullish attributed investment opportunity for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Unlocked shares already exist and you need a willing seller to buy them; not all will sell especially around the IPO price.” — The item describes share supply and selling behavior without a directional fundamental conclusion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “starting to add my layered GTC Limit bids in now, hopefully get filled on sharp liquidations.” — The item describes a trader's limit-order strategy and a hoped-for fill, not a scorable company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Micron long leverage X3 printing money again…” — The user's enthusiastic claim that Micron's leveraged position is highly profitable is a strongly positive attributed investment opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX guys check out $GLND 💥🚀🚀🚀” — The item is only a bare mention of SPCX without any substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Be bought the dip” — The item is a price-blind observation of a dip-buying sentiment rather than a scorable company fundamental.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “You should of listened when it was $175” — The item is a price-based observation about SPCX without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 100 eom” — The item reports a single closing price level without any fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “$SPCX best play on ai for next 20 years” — The post is an explicitly bullish attributed investment thesis about SPCX's AI opportunity.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Stock will rip higher next month.” — The user makes a strongly bullish forward price forecast for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX chillin 😎” — The item is a bare, neutral observation of SPCX with no substantive fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “other space memes barely go up when spcx does but when spcx drops. tanks its smaller brethren more” — The item describes SPCX's relative price movement without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “good dip” — The post is a price-blind observation of a share move with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Illegal Insider Trading alert!!” — The item asserts an illegal trading violation involving SpaceX, which is a strongly negative attributed allegation.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “Dumping. SELL NOW” — The post expresses a strongly bearish attributed opinion urging immediate selling.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX flushing, we may see 155 today” — The item is only a price prediction and does not state a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “non stop selling” — The item reports only a continuous share-price decline without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Alsmost thought my calls would expire itm” — The investor's near-expiration-of-the-money call is a positive attributed option outcome.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Come on down to 125” — The item is a price-level observation with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX oh gosh guess who told you so!” — The post is a bare, rhetorical mention of SPCX without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX we are here... hopefully it doesnt play out... but time will tell” — The post expresses uncertainty about an unspecified outcome but provides no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “$SPCX 104 will never happen” — The attributed view that a high target is unattainable is a strongly bullish forward opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX WEN 104????” — The item is only a bare share-price observation with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$SPCX Scared Money makes Zero Monies” — The post expresses a strongly negative attributed investor view that money is scared and unprofitable.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Fear doesn’t make you any money. Listen to the dumb ass bears on here is one of the dumbest things you can do for your investment.” — The author's bullish investment thesis is an attributed forward opinion about the company.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “Do not invest now. This will fall further.” — The author's explicit investment thesis predicts further downside for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX WOW!” — The exclamation is an untargeted reaction that does not state a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “buying a 2.5T company that has never generated positive FCF” — The attributed thesis characterizes the acquisition target as financially problematic.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Couple successful trades resulting in +$800” — The user reports a positive trading result, but the item contains no company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “glad i bought this at $175” — The user's satisfaction is tied to the historical purchase price, which is a price observation and not a scorable fundamental.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “stonks down” — The item reports a share-price move without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “$SPCX total collapse incoming!!!” — The post is an extreme, unattributed bullish prediction that a total collapse is incoming.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$QQQ $SPCX calls now or what” — The post is a generic call-to-action mentioning SPCX without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “this hurts my heart” — The user's emotional reaction expresses negative sentiment toward the company.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “whole market feels like it will implode tomorrow” — The item expresses a broad market view without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I was getting used to 7% gain everyday” — The item reports a historical share-price pattern without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 📉🥳” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.85 [social_text] “getting financed for it is suicide.” — The attributed view characterizes the proposed financing as an extreme, unsustainable risk.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX looks like a double bottom.” — A double-bottom is a technical price pattern and therefore a neutral observation under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$TSLA $SPCX $SPY $QQQ” — The item mentions SPCX only as part of a generic list of tickers without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Im buying!” — The user's stated purchase intent is a positive attributed investment opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “At least I’m a rich retard!” — The post expresses a personal, non-company-specific investment sentiment that does not bear on Palantir's fundamentals.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “some of the easiest long term holds you’ll find imo.” — The author expresses strong conviction that SPCX is an easy long-term hold.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX $QQQ power hour pump.” — The item reports only a price-related observation without a scorable company fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 160c exp tomorrow at 3.15” — The item reports a single option's expiration price without a directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the sell off in Space” — The item reports SpaceX's share-price decline without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Elon's billions in wealth is his own personal wealth... not $SPCX or $TSLA's wealth.” — The item makes a neutral factual distinction between Elon Musk's personal wealth and Tesla's corporate wealth.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “it’s because people will do anything to follow who they deem fit. Basically most people are retarded.” — The item is a general, non-company-specific observation about investor behavior rather than a substantive proposition about SPXC.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the market expects less severe volatility for tomorrow’s, October 9 tranche” — The attributed expectation concerns the magnitude of price volatility, which is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “2.25T for a company with only losses?” — The user's comparison of a large market cap to a loss-making company expresses a negative valuation opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX closing under 160 .. 149-153 tomorrow” — The item reports only a closing price range and a personal trade, which is a price observation and not a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX incoming to low 140s after tmr” — The item reports only a price level and direction without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX blast off tomorrow!” — The item is a bullish prediction about SPCX's share price, which is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “flooding the market with 330m shares of supply is definitely dilution” — The attributed thesis characterizes a large share supply as dilutive to the company.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX $133” — The item reports only a share price level without any scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this weeks point of equilibrium... but on the bearish side.” — The item presents a neutral equilibrium assessment with a weak bearish qualifier, yielding no directional sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Do you see $110 or $210 coming first?” — The item poses a price-level question without stating a directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Apparently no one understands the difference between dilution and share unlocks lol.” — The post conflates share dilution with unlocks, presenting dilution as a negative misunderstanding.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “sub $160 is Guaranteed tomorrow” — The user makes a confident bullish prediction about the stock's price.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX closed out my short.” — The item reports a personal short-trade outcome without stating a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX only up $1.18 and 20 minutes” — The item reports only a small share-price move, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “all those unlocked shares can be sold tomorrow” — The attributed thesis is that unlocked shares will increase supply and pressure the stock.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “bull statements saying this dip is a gift and hurry buy the dip” — The post characterizes the dip-buying thesis as bullish, though it is presented as a target of the author's skepticism.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX shorts will attack it at 165” — The attributed short thesis is a price-level observation rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$ASTS $SPCX $LUNR $RKLB” — The post is a bare multi-stock mention with no company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Trying to get to MARS ie: $200 seems like an impossible feat” — The item is a price-blind observation of a perceived target level rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the dip is a gift!” — The item is a price-blind observation of share movement without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$SPCX retards r doubling down I guess...” — The post expresses a strongly negative attributed opinion about SPCX's actions.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this is huge” — The item is a price-blind observation of SpaceX's share movement without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “I can’t wait to buy more!!” — The user's stated eagerness to purchase more shares is a strong bullish sentiment expression.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX 6% drop tomorrow, see you at $150 for the flush” — The author's bearish short thesis is explicitly stated.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “added, up from here, growth will be massive” — The source presents an explicitly bullish attributed thesis on SPCX's growth and direction.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX” — The post mentions SPCX only as part of a generic list of tickers without any company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the technical trading has been very very basic since June” — The item describes a neutral technical observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about SPCX.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “How much more pain must we endure!” — The post expresses strong distress about the investor experience, indicating negative sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “anyone swallowing 330M shares is going to want it at 130 IPO prices” — The item is a price-targeted observation about SPCX shares and does not state a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I warned you this morning” — The post asserts a prior warning but provides no company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion to score.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “very likely to be red again tomorrow” — The item predicts a further share-price decline, which is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “3 Red Crows pattern” — The Red Crows pattern is a technical formation describing share-price movement and carries no stated fundamental direction.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “only got back in on one of my accounts today” — The post confirms the investor's participation but contains no directional company-specific opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Bought this before eod” — The post is a personal trade note that does not provide a substantive company-specific sentiment proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$170 OPEN.” — The opening price is a reported market observation and carries no directional sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “$300 next year” — The post expresses a strongly bullish forward price target for SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX RKLB is up $.19 after hours” — The item reports only a post-market price move, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX is to Sydney Sweeney’s generational tiddies, as $SPCX generational wealth creation” — The item is a nonsensical comparison that does not state a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX Trending #2” — Trending status is a neutral observation of investor attention without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 7% dump att?” — The item reports a share-price move without stating a company-specific fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Follow the Money!” — The item is a generic investment call that does not state a substantive proposition about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX dude says this & blocks” — The post is a generic social observation about a user blocking someone; it does not present a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “I didnt sell! I buy the potholes!” — The user's refusal to sell and stated purchase of the company's shares express a positive attributed investment opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I feel horrible for any rookies who shorted this yesterday or today. Actually, I don't.” — The post expresses a personal view about shorting sentiment but offers no substantive fundamental or attributed opinion on SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Just buy $SPCX and chill” — The post is a price-blind recommendation to hold SPCX, which is a neutral company observation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “so which one did $SPCX wreck u on?” — The post is a rhetorical question about SPCE's impact on another investor, not a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “$200 asap” — The post expresses a strongly bullish expectation for SPCX's share price.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the markets are open on Columbus Day” — The item is a neutral observation about market operations with no scorable company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX 165.55 was yesterday's LOD” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Its just starting there.” — The author's bullish thesis that the stock is at an early stage is explicitly stated.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “So many shorts we’re piling in. It was amazing I was watching.
Probably why it’s up after hours. They’re getting squeezed already.” — The post describes a large short position and a reported after-hours squeeze, a directional short-squeeze dynamic.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX red by 2am” — The item reports only a share-price observation with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “IT HARDLY ANY VOLUME lol” — The item reports only a low-volume observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX did you listen nooooo haaaaaa” — This is a bare, non-substantive social mention of SPCX without a scorable company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX even Cathie sold..???” — The post is a speculative social observation about investor activity rather than a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Major wireless carriers stock DOWN 6% in after hours trading since SPACEx Starlink announcement.” — The item reports only a post-announcement share-price move, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX generational stock.” — The source presents an explicitly bullish attributed investment thesis about SPCX.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “to $300 EOY.” — The author's explicit bullish price target is a strong attributed forward opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$1.61 ➡️ $3.35” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$SPCX 200 trillion market cap is never happening, ever...” — The post expresses a strong skeptical view that the stated market-cap target is unattainable.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “kinda like ^_^ at this AH pump into 165 what a freeakin absolute ripper setup” — The author characterizes the advance into 165 as an attractive bullish setup.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “break out confrimed” — The item reports a price breakout without stating a fundamental reason or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “another classic wealth transfer event. Musktards are so gullible 😂” — The post characterizes SP CX investors as gullible and the event as a wealth transfer, expressing a strongly negative attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX big volume versus no volume move” — The item describes a reported volume and price move without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits