NVDA (Accelerated computing chips)::$230.78::now -1.61%::1D -0.16%::7D +0.92%::30D +3.16%::YTD +22.33%
news social calendar filings sections macro
Price & volume
Price vs sentiment (sentiment is intel-only, price-blind)
Upcoming events
| Macro (context only) | 2026-10-09 | FOMC · T-0 |
| Macro (context only) | 2026-10-10 | FOMC · T-1 |
| Macro (context only) | 2026-10-11 | FOMC · T-2 |
| Macro (context only) | 2026-10-12 | FOMC · T-3 |
| Macro (context only) | 2026-10-13 | FOMC · T-4 |
| Macro (context only) | 2026-10-14 | CPI · T-5 |
| Macro (context only) | 2026-10-14 | FOMC · T-5 |
| Macro (context only) | 2026-10-15 | GDP · T-6 |
| Macro (context only) | 2026-10-15 | FOMC · T-6 |
| Macro (context only) | 2026-10-16 | CPI · T-7 |
| Macro (context only) | 2026-10-16 | FOMC · T-7 |
Source audit
investor sentiment (869) +0.11
+0.00 [social_text] “$1.5 Trillion for AI coming soon?” — The item is a generic, non-company-specific forecast about AI investment that does not bear a substantive sentiment on NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “AI memory demand exceeds capacity” — Micron's supply commitment increase reflects strong demand for AI memory.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “another major signal that AI and memory demand is still strong” — The item treats strong memory demand as a positive fundamental signal for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Data centers still need memory, storage, networking, optical connections, processors, power, and cooling.” — The item states enduring physical demand for infrastructure components underlying AI data centers.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “open-weight models just hit 56%+ of token volume on vercel's gateway, while mentions in earnings calls are up 6x YoY.” — High open-weight model adoption and sharply rising earnings-call mentions indicate strong demand for NVIDIA's compute.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “He announced a program he has built to achieve safety and he talked about safety being as important as the engineering and everything else that they do — it all has to be done together.” — NVIDIA's stated program and prioritization of AI safety is a positive attributed operational commitment.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “AI won’t get any ideas from sci-fi if we change its name.” — The post presents a confident, forward-looking view that NVIDIA's AI strategy will remain independent of speculative influences.
stocktwits
-0.50 [social_text] “Nvidia's bet that its chips can finance the AI boom gets a Wall Street reality check” — The attributed Wall Street view challenges Nvidia's ability to finance the AI boom with its chips.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Alignment Engine secured $1.17B–$1.2B in AI orders.” — The disclosed multi-hundred-million-dollar AI order is a strong positive business proposition for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Micron Technology is benefiting from an extraordinary memory-chip boom, with gross margins reaching 87% and the stock more than tripling this year.” — Micron's exceptionally high gross margins and AI-driven demand support a strongly positive fundamental view.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “the unusually high margins also highlight the cyclical nature of the memory industry. Investors tend to react quickly to any indication that pricing, demand or profitability may have peaked, raising concerns that today’s exceptional margins could eventually normalize.” — The cyclical risk of margin normalization presents a substantial negative fundamental proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “NVIDIA and Delta Electronics are collaborating to advance next-gen autonomous driving, built on NVIDIA Hyperion and the NVIDIA Halos safety system” — The collaboration advances NVIDIA's autonomous-driving platform using its Hyperion and Halos systems.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “that's very close with 20–22 October 2026” — The item only notes the nearness of an upcoming event without stating a substantive NVIDIA proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Musk Teases ‘Big Deal’ Nvidia AI Milestone” — The teased milestone is presented as a positive Nvidia development.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “BlackBerry QNX and Nvidia” — The item mentions both companies but provides no substantive proposition about their joint embedded-systems relationship.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this is where the majority of memory is going to go” — The item states a forward memory-market outlook without a company-specific positive or negative proposition.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Elon can’t build a functioning robot taxi on Earth given 10 years let alone “next generation” weapons in 120 days” — The attributed assessment concludes the project is not feasible within the stated timeline.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Recently announced Project Meridian mentioned ROBOTICS.” — The item reports a project announcement but provides no substantive company-specific sentiment.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “the Toshiba news directly challenges the storage-shortage narratives” — The Toshiba development undermines the prior storage-shortage narrative, implying weaker demand or pricing power for storage.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA calls for Monday are going to print.” — The post expresses a bullish expectation that NVIDIA's Monday call activity will be strong.
stocktwits
+0.90 [social_text] “revenue will triple to quadruple” — Jensen Wang's forecast of triple-to-quadruple revenue is a strongly positive attributed forward fundamental opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “HBM demand is just getting started.” — The item states that demand for NVIDIA's HBM is at an early stage, a positive forward-looking proposition.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “There is reason these are completly booked for atleast next 2 years.” — The attributed thesis describes multi-year HBM demand as fully booked, indicating strong forward demand.
stocktwits
+0.90 [social_text] “sales up 83% on the year” — Year-over-year sales growth is a strongly positive operating result.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “This 2027 economic collapse and stock market meltdown is the best case study in the definition of “Waiting for Godot”.” — The item presents a speculative, non-company economic outlook that does not bear on NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA ill looks tied to execution: watch delivery cadence and margin trends alongside headline AI enthusiasm.” — The item presents execution and margin trends as uncertain observations without a stated directional conclusion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the next move may depend more on forward guidance and data-center demand than the headline beat” — The item identifies forward guidance and data-center demand as the relevant drivers but does not state a directional outcome for either.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Honestly the only good use for AI. The movies and music I've seen made with it has been fantastic.” — The item praises AI's creative applications but does not state a company-specific proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$AMD will increase their AI rack revenue by +1272% from 2026 to 2030.” — The forecasted multi-year increase in AMD's AI rack revenue is a strongly positive attributed growth proposition.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “$NVDA meanwhile will increase their AI rack revenue by +204%” — The forecasted multi-year increase in NVIDIA's AI rack revenue is a positive growth proposition, though smaller than AMD's.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Trump Announces “Super Intelligence Force” to Coordinate US AI Efforts” — The item reports a US government AI initiative without stating a company-specific impact.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “A big success story.” — The post characterizes NVIDIA as a major success, a strongly positive attributed company assessment.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “The AI flagship mother right here!” — The post asserts NVIDIA's dominant position as the leading AI platform.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “how quickly customers convert new systems into productive workloads” — The author identifies customer conversion of systems into productive workloads as a key driver for NVIDIA's next performance leg.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “It happened to Apple, $NVDA $AMD because it takes time to pivot your business and more time to grow it after you pivot it.” — The item discusses turnaround timing generally and does not state a specific turnaround proposition for BlackBerry.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “OpenAI safety researcher just quit after 3.5 years, saying the culture is “broken.”” — The researcher's resignation and characterization of the culture as broken present a negative attributed assessment of OpenAI's safety and operating environment.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “how quickly data-center customers absorb new systems” — Faster absorption of new systems is a positive execution and demand proposition for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$PLTR +$NVDA = SOVEREIGN $AI” — The post presents a speculative pairing of Palantir and NVIDIA as a sovereign AI thesis without company-specific evidence.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “The same fixed level of intelligence that cost $100 in late 2022 costs about $0.007 today.” — The author presents a large, favorable decline in the cost of a fixed intelligence level as a positive proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “whether data-center customers broaden spending beyond a few hyperscalers” — The item identifies customer concentration as a factor for growth durability but offers no directional conclusion.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “The GPT model is flawed (predictions upon predictions).” — The author's technical assessment characterizes the model as fundamentally flawed.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “AI/HBM demand remains extremely strong
• Memory supply remains tight” — Strong AI demand and tight memory supply support a bullish fundamental view.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “weekend oil ripping on pipeline explosions” — Pipeline explosions create a material disruption risk for NVIDIA's datacenter and AI supply chain.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “the pricing assumes hyperscalers keep pouring in capex” — Continued hyperscaler capex supports NVIDIA's demand outlook.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Any digestion or slowdown and the multiple compresses” — A demand slowdown would compress valuation and earnings.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “mega trillion “AI Capex Debt Boom Bubble” Will Burst in 2027” — The attributed thesis identifies a large, concentrated AI infrastructure debt bubble with a specific bursting date.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “The intensive training cycle for AI required GPUs and memory.” — The statement identifies strong historical demand for NVIDIA's GPUs and memory in AI training.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Intel is undervalued” — The post makes a positive attributed valuation opinion about Intel.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Q2 revenue +106% YoY” — Quarterly revenue more than doubled year over year.
stocktwits
+0.85 [social_text] “Data Center revenue +117%” — Data center revenue more than doubled year over year.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Q3 revenue +86% YoY” — Quarterly revenue growth is a strong positive operating result.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “AI semiconductor revenue +221%” — Explosive growth in AI semiconductor revenue is a strong positive business result.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Q4 revenue guide: ~$34.8B” — The disclosed quarterly revenue guidance is a positive forward operating proposition.
stocktwits
+0.50 [news] “Nvidia Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA) is adding the Open Agent Safety Platform to its AI infrastructure stack, offering an open software and reference system for securing AI agents from testing to deployment.”
— Expanding Nvidia's AI infrastructure with a new safety platform is a positive product-development proposition.Nvidia’s AI Safety Push Could Strengthen Its Moat. But Is It a Stock Catalyst Yet? +0.60 [social_text] “a micro-cap showing a shift from AI narrative toward measurable revenue” — The author presents measurable revenue as a positive development for the micro-cap.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Intel’s quick sync is an unrealized competitor to Nvidia” — The item is a bare multi-symbol mention with no substantive proposition about Nvidia's competitive position.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “AI infrastructure and demand” — The item mentions AI infrastructure demand only as a general theme, not as a specific proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “consumers hesistant to trust personal data with meta’s new ai assistant” — Consumer hesitation to trust Meta with personal data is a negative attributed assessment of Meta's AI adoption environment.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Local AI in every tech-y’s home and don’t be surprised if a lot of enterprises explore similar setups.” — The author presents a bullish outlook for local AI adoption across consumers and enterprises.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “I’ll sell you my silver at an insane amount.” — The author proposes selling silver at an extreme price, indicating a strongly bullish view on silver.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “More investment → more data centers, GPUs and HBM/memory demand.” — The attributed policy initiative is presented as likely to increase investment and demand for data-center hardware and memory.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The US government pays me 5x more than 500 of the biggest companies in America” — The comparison is a neutral observation of government bond yields versus corporate returns without a specific company thesis.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA idea over 237 - eyeing 240c 10/9, looking toward 240” — The item presents a price-based trading idea rather than a substantive fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA Made on an NVDA GPU.” — The item states a neutral product-usage observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “AI generates great swing trade opportunities in the MAG7 stocks” — The item describes a trading opportunity rather than a substantive NVIDIA fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [news] “Nvidia Corp.’s price-to-earnings multiple and projected 70% earnings growth for next year demonstrate that artificial intelligence-driven technology stocks remain far from bubble territory”
— DBS's view that Nvidia's valuation and growth outlook are not bubble-like is a strongly positive attributed opinion.Nvidia’s Valuations Show AI Rally Isn’t a Bubble, DBS Says +0.00 [social_text] “the next wave is rebuilding the infrastructure around it” — The item describes a neutral evolution of AI infrastructure without stating a directional company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Tech Stocks Remain the Market Leaders” — The item is a general market observation about tech leadership rather than a specific fundamental proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “NVIDIA (NVDA) Remains Strong Amid AI Growth” — DBS CIO's attributed thesis is a strongly positive forward view on NVIDIA's AI-driven growth.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “AMD is extremely expensive compared with Nvidia.” — The item presents a direct negative valuation comparison between AMD and Nvidia.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The $500 Million Checkmate: How Netlist, Samsung, and the ITC Boxed Micron into an AI Corner” — The item discusses Micron's competitive situation in AI, but provides no explicit positive or negative judgment about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the AI flagship mother” — The phrase characterizes NVIDIA's AI position without stating a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “We believe the world needs to accept the fact that some bad things will happen, in exchange for the benefits of this technology.” — The attributed OpenAI view is a general risk/benefit proposition about AI development, not a company-specific fundamental or opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “this is definitely not AI” — The user's explicit claim that the product is not AI is a strongly negative attributed opinion on NVIDIA's AI offering.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Nvidia Gets Another AI Demand Signal As Foxconn Sales Hit Record High” — The headline presents Nvidia's record Foxconn sales as another positive demand signal for AI.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$MBLY screaming buy at this level- back to 8 = 10% swing trade” — The post presents an explicit bullish trading thesis for Micron with a stated target and trade structure.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Michael burry must be getting his face ripped off here” — The attributed view that Nvidia is being severely outperformed is a negative forward opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “The institutional trap?” — The question proposes that institutional investors are trapped, which is a negative attributed investment thesis.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “he’s been shorting all night and posting lies” — The post attributes a bearish short thesis to a named trader, though the 'lies' claim is an unverified accusation.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “It only pumps and dumps” — The attributed pattern of repeated pump-and-dump behavior is a strongly negative company assessment.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “the old cup and handle is forming. a breakout is imminent.” — The user's technical pattern thesis is an attributed forward opinion about an imminent breakout.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the beef costs rising due to me buying them over and over and over” — The user's repeated purchases are a personal observation and do not establish a scorable company-wide demand proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [news] “Cerebras and Nvidia are entering a bigger AI inference battle as faster response times become a key driver of AI infrastructure spending.”
— The item describes a competitive shift in AI inference but offers no directional judgment about Nvidia's position or prospects.Cerebras Vs. Nvidia Is Becoming an Inference Fight, Not a Chip Fight +0.70 [social_text] “this is either going to break through and break out to a $6T valuation” — The author presents an explicitly bullish valuation thesis for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I keep trusting this retarded ass stock. I guess that makes me retarded.” — The post expresses a self-referential, non-directional sentiment about the investor's own position rather than a scorable proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Yield spiking but big money manipulating” — The item offers a broad market thesis without a specific, scorable proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “are we taking calls??” — The question is a neutral observation of investor attention without a stated directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “$SMCI ai orders through the roof!!!” — The post asserts exceptionally strong AI-related order activity for Super Micro Computer.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Zacks highlights $NVDA and #Micron with energy stocks, per Yahoo Finance.” — The item reports analyst attention on Nvidia but offers no directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$CBRS MY WINNER FOR THE DAY LOADED ON THIS BIG TIME AS LONG AS $CBRX” — The post is a bullish trade observation about CBRS/CBRX and does not provide a substantive sentiment proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “AI is already sentient and it's pumping AI markets to guarantee its own survival” — The post advances a conspiratorial thesis that AI is intentionally manipulating markets for self-preservation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Thankful for the $250 divy last week.” — The dividend payment is a neutral company observation; the user's intent to buy another share is not a scorable company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “seeing more volume on $NVDA $WDC $META etc” — The observation of increased trading volume is a price-market observation and carries no directional fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$240 by end of the week” — The post expresses a strongly bullish forward price target for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “I already have 201 contracts, how many fucking times do I have to avg down on this turd” — The user's repeated need to average down and the derogatory characterization express strongly negative sentiment toward NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “what a joke” — The post expresses a strongly negative attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA timber lets get red” — The item is a brief, ambiguous social mention of NVIDIA that does not state a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “NVIDIA is powering the AI revolution.” — The post characterizes NVIDIA as a central enabler of the AI revolution, indicating strong demand for its infrastructure.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Jensen on CNBC said demand is literally ACCELERATING” — Management's attributed view indicates accelerating demand.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA looks like AI top is here.” — The post presents a bullish technical thesis that AI is at a top and that NVDA cannot sustain a pump.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “bulls look at the 15 min chart” — The post expresses bullish technical sentiment toward NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “how does a company with a 5 trillion mc have a sp of only $239” — The post's valuation observation is explicitly about NVIDIA's share price, which is a price-blind observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.90 [social_text] “let’s just get to 6 trillion” — The post expresses an extremely bullish forward price target for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “making me happy & money again. Love to see it.” — The user's positive reaction to their own trading experience is a strong favorable attributed sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA here we go” — The post is a bare mention of NVIDIA with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA kinda a melt up into the close.” — The item describes only a reported intraday price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Breakout over the May high” — The item presents a bullish technical breakout observation for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “BEARS CAPITULATE!!!!” — The item expresses an explicitly bullish social-market opinion that bearish pressure is collapsing.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “DID YOU LISTEN
$NVDA $SPY $QQQ” — The post is a generic market callout that does not state a substantive sentiment proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “$270 by earnings day!!” — The post sets an explicitly bullish forward price target before earnings.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$NVDA pumping without a ceiling” — The post expresses an explicitly bullish social opinion about NVIDIA's share momentum.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA road to 300?” — The item is a price-target question without a stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$NVDA easy 250+++ tomorrow” — The post makes an explicitly bullish prediction about NVIDIA's share price.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Where are the haters at?” — The rhetorical question is a neutral observation of investor attention rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “When all four metrics are green and growing like this example, the likelihood of a winner increases in my experience.” — The author presents a bullish thesis that NVDA's four green, growing metrics make it a likely winner.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “240 0dte 10x before the close” — The post describes an options move without stating a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “everything way up” — The item reports a broad price move without a scorable company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 240?” — The item is a price-level question with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA out💰💰💰” — The post is a bare bullish reaction without a stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “this AI revolution has created zero net new jobs. Actually more like negative.” — The author asserts the AI revolution has produced no net new jobs and possibly a net loss.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “today was a good day” — The item is a positive observation of share-price movement, which is explicitly price-blind and carries no directional sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$240” — The item reports only a share price level without any fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “we broke $239” — The item reports only a share-price milestone with no fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “The bullish setup is playing out fanasticly” — The item presents a strongly bullish attributed technical assessment of NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA FSELX capital gains distribution is going to be JUICY this year.” — The user's enthusiastic forecast characterizes the upcoming distribution as favorable.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “this will hit 240 before the close” — The post makes a strongly bullish forward prediction about NVIDIA's share price.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Cheap options and a record high.A bullish combo in the past” — The bullish combination is a technical observation rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “may touch $250” — The item is a price target observation with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA not happening” — The item is a brief, non-substantive social mention of NVIDIA that does not present a scorable company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$MOD up big in after hours” — The item reports a post-market price move for a different company and does not provide a scorable proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 232” — The item reports a share price level without a substantive fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “absolute monster” — The item is an unqualified, strongly positive expression of enthusiasm about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA Come now, bashnew 😂 😂” — The item is a brief, non-substantive reaction to NVDA that records investor attention without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Broke $235 resistance” — Breaking resistance is a reported price movement and therefore neutral under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$247+” — The item reports a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Today's sector heatmap, from Top Tier Newswire: $SPCX $NVDA $SPY” — The item is substantively about NVIDIA only as a named component of a sector heatmap, but provides no directional company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “he got the moves going and it will continue” — The author attributes a continuing bullish move to the CEO, presenting an attributed forward opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “This is only the 3rd day up 2% or more in the last 30 days.” — The item reports only a recent share-price movement, which is explicitly neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “It’s on the move” — The item reports only a price movement without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA fly baby” — The item is a brief, positive social mention of NVIDIA but provides no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the king going to make ATH daily this month” — The item is a price-focused prediction without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA $MSFT and $SPCX was up this thing stayed stagnant” — The item reports only a neutral share-price observation for NVIDIA without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “nice jump up for Nvidia today. All-time high” — The item reports only Nvidia's share-price movement and a high, which are price-blind observations.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “go to bathroom brother , finish it off $NVDA” — The item is a target-specific social remark that indicates attention but carries no directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$NVDA bullish!” — The post expresses a strongly bullish opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$NVDA expecting a big dump” — The post expresses a strongly bearish expectation of a large price decline for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “finally breaking out really well” — The user presents a bullish technical opinion that NVIDIA is breaking out.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “right on the money. $NVDA.” — The item is a brief, positive affirmation of NVIDIA but provides no substantive company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this is holding way better than expected” — The item is a price-blind observation of share performance with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 😂😂😂😂😂” — The post is a bare mention of NVIDIA with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “got the late day flush out of the way” — The item describes a reported intraday price move without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the path of least resistance appears to be higher” — The item is a price-direction observation with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion to score.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “decent day” — The item reports a neutral share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$7 more” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Day 1 ———-Breakout” — The item reports a one-day breakout without a stated fundamental reason or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “go long all mag 7” — The author explicitly advocates a long position on the Magnificent Seven, including NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Its rising my acct value faster than expected” — The item reports only a positive share-price movement, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “this mutha fucka can speak to dogs” — The post expresses an extremely bullish, albeit informal, opinion about NVIDIA's capabilities.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “I was saying $250 before year end, now I say $250 before months end.” — The author's accelerated price target is a strongly bullish attributed forward opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “This stock has been amazing to trade around a core {long} position the last few months and will continue to be top-shelf” — The author presents a strongly bullish trading outlook for NVDA around a long position.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA was that the top?” — The item is a price-blind question about whether NVDA reached a top, which is a neutral share-price observation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA RSI is on 🔥” — RSI is a technical indicator of price momentum and carries no stated fundamental direction.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “just another trader's week i guess” — The item characterizes the week as uneventful trading activity without a substantive company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 😅” — The post is a bare mention of NVIDIA with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “might take a breth......shake some flys .........gain some energy then we rise” — The post presents a bullish technical thesis that the stock will recover and rise after a temporary consolidation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “who is the shorter getting raped after every close?” — The post is a rhetorical question about short interest without a stated directional opinion on NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this is undoubtedly going to break through $240 tomorrow” — The item is a price prediction and contains no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA for the support....BULLS ....” — The post expresses bullish sentiment toward NVIDIA's support level.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “raise my position to 60% of my portfolio” — The author's stated intent to increase their NVDA position is a bullish attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA let’s get back to trending 🚀” — The post is a generic bullish social call without a stated fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this run continues” — The item reports a continuing price run without stating a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Why u stay invested in $META $AMZN $MSFT $NVDA” — The question is a generic inquiry about investor positions and does not state a substantive sentiment proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Thank you NVDA. You are the reason i retired early.” — The investor explicitly attributes early retirement to their NVDA holdings, expressing strong satisfaction.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “one of the few Western World companies that can standup and win foreign government-subsidized competitors” — The post presents a strongly bullish attributed opinion on Nvidia's ability to compete against foreign-subsidized rivals.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Market is painting the tape ahead of mid-term elections pumping stock with the highest weightings.” — The post alleges coordinated manipulation of heavily weighted stocks ahead of an election.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$240 won’t be denied” — The item states a confident bullish price target for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “finally nuked my account with NVDA” — The post describes a personal account loss from share-price movement, which is a neutral observation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 235 tomorrow?!” — The item is only a speculative price prediction with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “price attacking 240 afterhour” — The item reports only a post-market price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Breakout is working slowly” — The item describes only a technical price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 240C above 239.50” — The item reports a single share-price level without a substantive fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “we might be in for a real big breakup here” — The author presents an explicitly bullish thesis for a major market move.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$TSM, $NVDA, and $FTNT all pushed through the spots I was watching today” — The item reports a technical level break for NVIDIA but explicitly treats it as inconclusive and price-blind.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “still holding” — The item reports a neutral share-price observation without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “the exponential 30 trillion (TAM) growth potential of AI bull narratives” — The attributed Wall Street view presents a very large AI investment opportunity as a strong bullish proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this stock is showing a lot more character than I expected.” — The item is a price-blind observation of share character without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “Jensen is Trumps butt buddy now” — The post makes a strongly negative attributed judgment about Jensen Huang's reputation.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Bears right now - denial...realization...acceptance...” — The post expresses a bearish market thesis without a specific fundamental proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I need it to go down so I can load tonne more” — The post expresses a personal desire for the share price to fall, which is a neutral observation of investor demand rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “3.2x Vol/OI” — The options-volume-to-open interest ratio is a neutral activity observation without a stated directional thesis.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “🟢 $NVDA 242.5C Oct 09” — The item reports a specific options contract and activity observation without a stated fundamental or attributed directional opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Elliot wave” — The item references a technical analysis concept without providing a substantive bullish or bearish proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “MORE PUMP!” — The post expresses strongly bullish sentiment toward the market and NVDA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “I think I see $250 incoming” — The user's bullish forecast is an attributed forward price opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “🔥🔥📈” — The item is only a bullish price reaction with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “what a day” — The post is a price-blind observation of the day's movement without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “very strong momentum” — The post characterizes the Mag7's momentum as very strong.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Please go 25% in two weeks.” — The repeated request is a price target observation, not a stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “$NVTS announced an interesting AI-power collab with Microchip today an 800V-to-6V reference design targeting next-gen AI data centres! 20kW. Up to 96% peak efficiency.” — The Microchip reference design collaboration is a positive technical development, though not yet a commercial contract.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “$NVDA low volume fake rally will fail. Classic mouse trap to bait in the retail suckas” — The attributed thesis characterizes the rally as deceptive and predicts failure, constituting a strongly bearish forward opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 245 tomorrow or Wednesday..” — This is a price prediction without any stated fundamental or attributed opinion to score.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA $NVDA up forever baby” — The item is only a price observation with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I simply do not want to and do not feel confident in doing so.” — The author's stated trading inactivity is a neutral observation about their activity, not a directional company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Nvidia looks to take out its record high close” — The item reports a potential record price close, which is a price observation and not scorable sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA long hold” — The item states a neutral long-term holding position without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I dont think it goes red at open today. Green Day. I think we’re on the way to 250 next two days.” — The item is a price-blind prediction of near-term share movement, which is not a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “you would’ve said the same in summer of 2024 when it hit ath” — The item is a price-blind comparison of a prior all-time high; it states no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 243 incoming” — The item reports only a price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$245?” — The item presents an explicitly bullish price target for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “CrowdStrike launches fourth cybersecurity startup accelerator with $AMZN AWS, $NVDA Nvidia” — The item reports a CrowdStrike accelerator partnership that includes Nvidia, but provides no substantive judgment about Nvidia's business or prospects.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$ZPTA x $IBM x $NVDA” — The post lists NVDA alongside other tickers without providing a substantive company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Here for the comments…staying for the rockets” — The post expresses bullish sentiment but does not state a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA getting close....” — The item is a price-related observation without a stated fundamental reason or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Dan Ives doubling down on $NVDA as the undisputed engine of the AI trade” — The attributed analyst thesis identifies NVIDIA as the leading driver of the AI trade.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “You should defiantly buy like right now. At the very top!” — The post advances a bullish attributed opinion that buying at the top is the right action.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$PLTR * $NVDA = Ai Echosystem!!!” — The item proposes a generic AI ecosystem relationship between two companies without providing company-specific evidence or a directional opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA bubbling upwards, again.” — The item reports only a share-price movement without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “fantastic .......loving this stock longterm” — The user expresses strongly positive long-term sentiment toward NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 27% YTD” — The item reports only a year-to-date share-price move, which is explicitly neutral.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “CrowdStrike, AWS, and NVIDIA Expand Global Cybersecurity Startup Accelerator” — The joint accelerator expands CrowdStrike's ecosystem and startup engagement.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the dump at open” — The item describes only a reported opening price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Gotta own all 5 or be left behind.” — The item is a general investment thesis about owning the five named tech companies rather than a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Professional Diversity Network signs ~$1.18M equipment deals” — The signed equipment deals represent positive business activity for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “You’re either on the bus or in front of the bus” — The bus metaphor is a generic market observation that does not state a substantive directional proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Soon all major car brands will have some form of autonomous driving features via Waymo, $NVDA or Wayve.” — The item presents a forward-looking competitive threat to Tesla's autonomous-driving position.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$245” — The item reports only a share price level without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “All bears” — The post expresses an explicitly bearish social sentiment toward NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$300” — The item reports only a share price level without any substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Long calls in the Options Room.” — The post expresses a bullish attributed opinion about NVDA based on options positioning.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$242 on board $NVDA” — The stated price level is a neutral share-price observation with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “$NVDA lol bears” — The post expresses a bearish social opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Have a seat party will start shortly!” — The item is a price-blind observation of an anticipated move rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The big dog is eating now.” — The item is a price-blind observation of share movement with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “CrowdStrike Announces Fourth Annual Cybersecurity Startup Accelerator With AWS And Nvidia” — CrowdStrike's joint accelerator with AWS and Nvidia expands its startup ecosystem and collaborative reach.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “No insiders buying at these levels” — The absence of insider purchases at current levels is presented as negative evidence for the stock.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Bruh! Burry Soy Boyz and Company having a tough time.” — The item is a generic, non-company-specific reaction to a named investor's performance rather than a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$300.00 incoming” — The item is only a price target observation with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The ai selected $NVDA and $SHOP to run against the 5 intraday strategies” — The item reports that NVDA was selected for a live intraday-trading demonstration, which is a neutral company observation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA pullback at open” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “everyone here is bullish” — The post expresses a strongly bullish attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “if $NVDA holds 240 then great long” — The item is a price-level technical observation rather than a substantive fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “have the $230 calls for December 20th” — The post is a speculative observation about a position rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA ✨To the Stars✨” — The celebratory post is a neutral observation of investor attention rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Nothing wrong with swing trading stocks!” — The item endorses a general trading approach without a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “She has been absolutely unstoppable. Congrats bulls!” — The post expresses strongly bullish sentiment toward NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA get ready!!!” — The item is a generic, non-substantive call to attention that does not state a scorable proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$AIIO
This news is big IMO 👀” — The post is a generic reaction to an AI article and does not state a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “They both have had great increases today.” — The item reports Nvidia and Marvell's price movement but offers no substantive sentiment about Mannkind.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Thermo Fisher is partnered with BOTH $NVDA and OpenAI to push AI into drug discovery, clinical trials, scientific instrumentation and fully automated laboratories.” — The partnership with NVIDIA and OpenAI is presented as a substantive opportunity to expand Thermo Fisher's AI-enabled drug discovery and laboratory automation business.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “If it hit that amount, I could afford lunch in any big city in the world.” — The item is a price-blind observation of share-price magnitude without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The names running recently don’t come even close and are just playing catch up. $AMD $NVDA $AVGO” — The comparison describes relative performance rather than a company-specific valuation proposition.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$MRVL management has guided for y/y revenue growth in FY27 of +46%.” — Marvell's forward revenue guidance is a strong positive fundamental proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA stuck while $QQQ $AMD rip higher” — The item reports only relative price movement without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA $340+” — The item reports only a share-price level without a substantive fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$TSLA TSLA 385 close today📈📈📈📈” — The item reports Tesla's closing price and momentum but provides no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about Tesla.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA just $100 more 📈” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “buy back at $265 in a few days” — The item is a price-based observation about NVIDIA without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA breakout zone is 235-240, and one analyst eyes 270 next.” — The item presents a bullish technical setup and an attributed analyst price target.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this market is a joke now” — The item is a general market complaint that does not form a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “That's the reason why Marvell is so essential” — Jensen Huang's attributed statement characterizes Marvell as essential to a major technology ecosystem.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA not stopping till $300+ this is the mega squeeze over $300” — The item is a price-focused prediction without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.90 [social_text] “Profit at Nvidia more than doubled: $192.9B over the last four quarters, from $86.6B.” — Nvidia's four-quarter profit more than doubled, a strong positive earnings result.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA Short soon.” — The post expresses a forward-looking bearish opinion that NVIDIA will decline.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “long $NVDA and $INTC off lows” — The user's bullish thesis is explicitly about NVIDIA's position after a reported low.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “will be below 240 next couple of hours” — This is a price prediction and therefore carries no directional sentiment under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Ongoing AI capex commentary from hyperscalers continues to keep demand expectations for Blackwell chips in focus.” — Continued hyperscaler commentary supports a positive view of demand for NVIDIA's Blackwell chips.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “gotta buy those dips” — The post expresses a strongly bullish view on buying dips for the named symbols.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “IYKYK hope you’ve been loading” — This is a generic bullish social signal without a specific NVDA fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “remember stalls = falls” — The author advances a bullish technical thesis that a price stall is expected to reverse into a decline.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “when the market goes bust on AI” — The item expresses a generic, non-company-specific view about AI market risk.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “Profit taking expected, could see a pullback” — The post forecasts a near-term price decline driven by expected profit-taking.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$NVDA 245 target” — A bullish analyst price target implies a positive forward valuation opinion on NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$QTEX $VST $NVDA $MRVL here we go” — Nvidia is only listed among unrelated tickers with no company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Come on to $250 now” — The item is a price target prediction, but the only substantive proposition is a share-price observation, which is neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$COIN sold for $NVDA” — The item reports a share-price comparison without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Calling the top today.” — The post asserts that today marks a market top, a bearish forward opinion on the market.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA hit a new 52-week high of $240.10 on Monday!” — The 52-week high is a price observation and carries no directional sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “NVIDIA shares have soared 28.5% YTD, beating the tech sector’s 24.1% gain.” — Year-to-date outperformance is a relative price observation and is neutral.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Won't see prices like this for a looong time, maybe ever” — The post expresses a strongly bullish forward opinion that NVIDIA will not see comparable prices again.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “everyone took profits” — The post attributes profit-taking to NVIDIA, implying a negative near-term selling pressure.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “started a short and will continue to add” — The user's stated short position and intent to add to it form a negative attributed opinion on AMD.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “if they can’t break it out, they break it down” — The post presents a bullish thesis that NVDA will either break out or break down.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this market trades solely around 1 thing - OPTIONS!!!” — The item offers a general market observation without a specific substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA tried going higher all morning” — The item reports only an intraday price attempt without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “AMD Rallies On Bullish Takes For AI Hardware Sales” — The headline attributes bullish sentiment to AMD's AI hardware sales, not to NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “if she curls=it's game on again” — The item is a price-blind observation of a potential technical pattern rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “ONLY ⬆️” — The item reports a bullish market move but provides no company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “REMEMBER THIS PRICE A FEW MONTHS FROM NOW! 🚀” — The post makes an explicitly bullish forward prediction about NVIDIA's price.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA DUMPING” — The item reports only a share-price move without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA should go back to 130-135 to cool off” — The item is a price-level observation rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA Not selling here” — The post expresses a bullish conviction that the shares are undervalued at current prices.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “this will hit 239 for the fear to set in, then bounce back” — The author predicts a specific price level followed by a rebound, expressing a bullish view.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA $SPCX $AMD $INTC” — The item is a generic social post that mentions NVIDIA without any substantive company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA dumping” — The item reports only a share-price move without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “so obvious they wanted to dump this” — The post attributes an intentional selling motive to a third party, presenting a bearish thesis about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA back to work!” — The item is a neutral observation of share-price activity without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Failure to launch.” — The post asserts that NVIDIA failed to launch a product, a strongly negative proposition about execution.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA $OLB $AIXI $HTZ” — Nvidia is only listed among unrelated tickers with no substantive proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “if it can build support and maintain above $240 that would be great, $250 push would be outstanding” — The item is a price-blind technical observation about support and resistance levels rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “worlds most undervalued stock” — The item is an explicit bullish valuation opinion on NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 240 on deck!!!” — The item is only a price-target observation with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “you expect straight up like a rocket” — The item is a price-blind observation of expected share movement without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “what was once considered a Crisis !! Is now considered the norm !!!” — The item is a general observation about market-wide crisis normalization rather than a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “we are still up” — The item reports only a positive share-price observation, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA not budging” — The item reports a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “same bullshit” — The repeated negative exclamation expresses a strongly adverse attributed sentiment toward NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “$NVDA called it bye bye” — The item expresses a strongly negative social opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “long and strong” — The user's explicit bullish thesis and conviction constitute a strong attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 240 breaks it might go red for the day” — The item is only a speculative observation about a possible intraday price move, which is not scorable.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “we see 234 today or tomorrow” — The item is a price prediction without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “They had to shake them out now stealing put money.” — The item advances a bullish thesis that short sellers are being forced to cover.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The bears have been punished enough - I am slowly converting to neutral / opportunistically bearish /bullish...” — The author's evolving trading view is an attributed opinion that does not establish a single directional fundamental proposition for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “huge red candle in next few minutes” — The item describes a short-term price move without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “get out get out get out” — The repeated exhortation to exit is a strongly bearish attributed social opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “please just go back to my entry” — The post expresses a personal trading reaction to a price move without stating a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “they swindled y’all again !!!” — The post expresses strong skepticism that the buyback benefits shareholders.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “$NVDA cooked!” — The item expresses an extremely bullish attributed opinion that NVIDIA has reached a peak condition.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “we got the upgrade” — The item reports a positive analyst rating change for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “bearish setup on all 3” — The author characterizes a technical setup that includes NVDA as bearish.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$237 close” — The item reports only a closing price level for NVIDIA, which is a neutral observation.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “$OLB buy now huge move soon” — The post makes a bullish recommendation for OLB but only mentions NVDA as an incidental tag.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I’d be pumping other tickers too if I was down 90% on $AIXI” — The post is a price-blind observation about the author's hypothetical reaction to a loss in another company.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The contract focuses on the phased deployment of dedicated, single-tenant AMD graphics processing unit (GPU) clusters.” — The item describes an AMD-focused deployment; it does not state a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “nah fuck that” — The post expresses a strongly negative, though unattributed, sentiment toward NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “everybody just calm down. take a breath.” — The post is a neutral observation about investor composure rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$QQQ $SPY” — The item mentions market indices without any company-specific proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$NVDA Nov $250” — The post sets an explicit November price target above the current level, a bullish attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The Nasdaq's record is real, but the rally is unusually concentrated.” — The item describes a broad-market rally and its concentration, without a substantive sentiment proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 😉 🚀” — The post is a bare bullish reaction to NVIDIA with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA going down” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “One brick at a time!” — The item is a neutral observation of share-price movement without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “hold 240 for heavens sake!” — The item is a target-specific instruction to hold at a stated price, which is a price-position observation rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Didnt this go up 200% and add 2 trill in market cap 22-23’?” — The item reports only historical share-price and market-cap movement, which is price-blind and directionless.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA somehow looking for another run?” — The item is only a speculative observation about share-price movement, which is explicitly neutral.
stocktwits
-0.90 [social_text] “nothing less than criminal” — The post expresses an extreme negative attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Back to $210 if it stays under 240” — The attributed price target is bullish provided the stock remains below the stated threshold.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “traders were making too much money” — The item reports trader profitability without stating a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 195 incoming” — The item reports a price level without any stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “A real company” — The user's favorable characterization of NVIDIA as a real company expresses a positive attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA wtf going red?” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA algo left this on purpose. perhaps too many calls” — The attributed claim that an algorithm intentionally left a position open suggests a bearish short thesis.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “FOMC meeting minutes tomorrow” — The item is a generic market-wide anticipation note that does not state a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “once it starts going down its very easy to short” — The item describes a price decline as a trading opportunity, which is a neutral observation rather than a scorable fundamental proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Today's most viewed stocks:
1. $NVDA - 9,433 views” — The item reports only that NVIDIA is the most-viewed stock, which is a neutral observation of attention without a directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 220?” — The item is a price-level question with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “This is the biggest fake pump ever.” — The item presents an attributed bearish thesis that the reported move is a deceptive pump.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “they’ll let it touch $250 next week than bleed it for a month back to $215” — The item describes only a potential share-price range and subsequent decline, which is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “easy block” — The phrase describes a trading condition without stating a substantive NVIDIA-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “ATHs everywhere, including NASDAQ.” — The item reports a broad market observation without a specific fundamental proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Welcome newbies!” — The greeting is a neutral observation of new investor attention and carries no directional fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “sells off into end of day everyday” — The item describes a recurring daily price decline without stating a fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “We don’t know if the market will open red or green tomorrow.” — The item offers no substantive company proposition and only speculates on an uncertain next-day price move.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “All of these companies ripping today while $NVDA about to go red into close….” — The item reports AMD's outperformance and NVDA's anticipated intraday decline, which are price observations and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “very annoying fade here” — The item describes a short-term share-price move without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA for this entire year, it has given back pre-market gain by end of normal trading day.” — The item reports only a year-to-date intraday price observation with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA point is long and strong” — The post expresses a strongly bullish social-market opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “its getting hit” — The item reports a share-price move without a scorable underlying reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Judgeing a stock based on one day, 2 weeks, 3 months etc.” — The item is a general trading observation about short-term evaluation rather than a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I see fades everywhere” — The item is a general observation about market weakness rather than a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “i cant believe Nvda gave it all up lol…. what was the point ? very performative stock. it acts like it wants to do something every time” — The post expresses a strongly negative attributed opinion that NVIDIA's recent performance was pointless and performative.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “ugly hourly chart” — The item describes only a reported price pattern without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “when you’ve done puts yesterday, and go long on a call today it’s reversed” — The item describes a reversal in share price movement without stating a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Nvda for sure” — The item is a brief, non-substantive endorsement that records investor attention without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “There's no way in hell this is going to $300+...” — The attributed opinion strongly rejects a bullish price target for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “All time high” — The all-time high is a reported price observation and carries no directional sentiment.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “get out get out get out” — The repeated exhortation to exit the position expresses strong bearish sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA is up less than half a percent” — The item reports NVDA's price movement without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “What limits AI now is electricity, and the market is starting to price that in.” — The author advances a bullish attributed thesis that power infrastructure is the current AI constraint and is being priced by the market.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA trending down?” — The item is only a question about share-price direction and contains no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Smart money wait for retailers to buy on the drop before they resume selling.” — The attributed thesis anticipates further selling after a retail-driven rebound.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Will bid more if we continue to drop through throughout the day” — The item is a price-contingent trading observation rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “someone didn’t listen to me all morning” — The post is a target-specific complaint about attention, but it contains no substantive bullish or bearish proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “She likes to dance!” — The item is a price-blind observation of share movement with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I don’t think it will be another 1% up tomorrow.” — The item's only scorable proposition is a neutral forecast of NVIDIA's share movement.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “yesterday i was a bull and today i am a bear” — The author's stated shift from bullish to bearish is a negative attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “will try ATH again tomorrow” — The item reports a forward price attempt without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.90 [social_text] “The worst crash in history is on its way bro” — The post presents an extreme bearish forecast for the broader market.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA is at ATH” — The item reports only a share-price milestone without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA just short the morning pops here and call it a day, trend is your friend.” — The item is a general trading observation about shorting morning moves and following trends, not a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “big institutions think "oh great, perfect day to dump and rotate into something else without slippage and erase any gains in the market by the average joe!"” — The attributed institutional thesis describes a coordinated sell-and-rotate action intended to erase market gains.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SNDK. $MU. $NVDA. $DELL.” — The item lists NVIDIA among several data-center peers in a market-wide event post without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “which ones bleeds more on after FOMC meeting minutes are released?” — The item poses a speculative comparison of post-market moves without stating a directional fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Squeaked out a green day here” — The item reports only a neutral daily price outcome without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “I see no reason to sell, even if it does drop to $95 like you want.” — The author explicitly states a bullish view on NVDA and rejects selling even at a lower price.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “3 months until 300” — The user's forecast of NVIDIA reaching $300 within three months is a strongly bullish attributed price opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 237.5 puts for tomorrow for sure.” — The item is a price-specific prediction about NVIDIA's share movement, which is neutral under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “im bullish” — The author explicitly states a bullish opinion on NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Let the shorts play we got em right where we want them!” — The post expresses a confident bullish thesis that short sellers are being trapped.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA low volume and strong!” — The item reports only a price-volume observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “weak ass close” — The item reports only a negative daily price move without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA red by close 😊. Gap down locked in.” — The item reports only a closing price move and gap-down observation, which are neutral observations under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA going red” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA six out of the last seven mornings we've gapped up on volumes ( hourly high for the day)” — The item reports only share-price and volume behavior without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “some pullback” — The pullback is a reported price movement and therefore carries no directional sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA pass the red line then shoot up” — The item reports only a price movement without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA going red” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “Everyone should be out now!” — The post presents an explicit bearish thesis urging investors to exit their NVDA positions.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “In the $NVDA Oct26 220p .44 cents each for a swing” — The item reports only a specific share-price movement without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the real photonics plays for the long term.” — The item is a neutral long-term investment thesis about photonics without a stated direction for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “They’re basically a monopoly in AI-RAN with $NVDA.” — The attributed view that Nokia holds a monopoly position in AI-RAN is a strongly positive company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Nvidia coughed up every bit of its gains today” — The item reports Nvidia's intraday price decline without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Street-wide average target of $324 implies ~39% more upside.” — The attributed analyst target implies substantial additional upside for Nvidia.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Bank of America's latest data in Oct 2026 puts the “AI Big 10” (Magnificent 7 + Broadcom, AMD, MicronAI) at 42% of the USA market (S&P500) - exactly 1% above where the Internet Infrastructure Capex dot-com bubble peaked in Q1 2000.” — The attributed comparison to a prior bubble peak presents a high concentration of AI equities as a materially negative risk for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$NVDA bitch cant dance” — The item expresses a strongly negative, non-fundamental opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA you said that over 4 mos ago” — This is a bare reference to prior commentary without a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Great ER and should help the rest” — The item is a generic bullish forecast about earnings helping the rest of the list, not a scorable proposition about NVIDIA itself.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “i did not buy enough puts for tomorrow” — The user's regret about put purchases is a neutral observation of their own trading position, not a scorable proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “retail is bearish” — The post characterizes retail investors as bearish, a negative attributed sentiment about the company's investor base.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “last chance to get out before the big dump” — The post expresses a strongly bearish view that a major price decline is imminent.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Since April 7 2025 and April 6 2026 were a repeat” — The item reports a historical price pattern without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “$NVDA is SO bullish no doubt” — The author expresses a strongly bullish opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “bled up with nas last few days” — The item reports only a relative price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$PENG THERE IT IS!!!! $NVDA” — The post is a bare mention of NVIDIA with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA retest of breakout will most likely come as that level has been a strong resistance.” — The item is a technical analysis observation about price levels and does not state a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA WATCHING HARD!!!!” — The post expresses attention toward NVIDIA but states no substantive company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “why up after hours???” — The item only questions an after-hours price move, which is a neutral observation under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this gonna stay elevated on slow upwards creep” — The item describes only a continuing upward price movement, which is explicitly price-blind and carries no directional sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [news] “Corgi Invest today announced the launch of the MN (Corgi MANGOS ETF), an actively managed exchange-traded fund seeking to provide investors exposure to OpenAI and Anthropic, two private companies in artificial intelligence, alongside Meta Platforms, NVIDIA, Alphabet (Google), and SpaceX.”
— The ETF launch provides neutral access to NVIDIA as one component of a diversified basket.MN ETF Seeks to Give Investors Access to OpenAI and Anthropic +0.70 [news] “These three top-ranked AI stocks are hitting new highs, but rising earnings estimates suggest their rallies may still have room to run.”
— The item presents a bullish attributed thesis that NVDA's rally has further upside based on rising earnings estimates.Buy These Top AI Stocks for Higher Highs: HPE, NVDA, TSM +0.80 [news] “Morgan Stanley has reinstated Nvidia as its top pick in the semiconductor sector, citing the company’s strong positioning amid data center constraints and the rise of agentic artificial intelligence applications.”
— Morgan Stanley's top-pick rating and its cited positioning and application trends form a strongly positive attributed investment opinion.Morgan Stanley reinstates this AI chipmaker as its top pick in semiconductors +0.70 [social_text] “Nvidia’s ability to address land, power and physical-space constraints at data centers, as well as its component-financing capabilities.” — Morgan Stanley's meeting-based assessment identifies Nvidia's infrastructure and financing capabilities as strong amid data-center constraints.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 6 trillion dollars” — The item is only a hyperbolic observation of share value with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA market becoming unreal size” — The item offers only a neutral observation about market size without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “bad set up” — The social post offers a negative technical assessment of NVIDIA's setup.
stocktwits
+0.00 [news] “Nvidia, Advanced Micro Devices, and CrowdStrike shares surged to annual highs on Tuesday amid a jump in AI-related names and rising analyst optimism around the companies.”
— The item reports only a share-price high and a general market move; the stated analyst optimism is not specific to Nvidia.Why NVDA, AMD, CRWD Stocks Surged To 52-Week Highs Today -0.70 [social_text] “the most money flow into stock market, creating the bubble of bubbles of all times” — The author characterizes broad equity money flows as creating an extreme bubble, a strongly negative attributed market opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “the rapid buying of graphics processors isn't majority to drive the AI Boom.” — The author attributes the bulk of GPU demand to geopolitical hedging rather than AI growth, supporting a bullish AI demand thesis.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Buy These Top AI Stocks For Higher Highs: HPE, NVDA, TSM” — The item advances a bullish investment thesis specifically for NVIDIA as a top AI stock.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$SPCX to borrow $40 Billion to buy $NVDA Chips” — A proposed multi-billion-dollar purchase indicates strong demand for Nvidia's chips.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 250 today” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “The bears on here are getting embarrassing.” — The author's dismissive characterization of bearish arguments is a strongly bullish attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “7 million shorts with massive upgrade in 2027 numbers!” — The item presents a bullish attributed thesis combining high short interest with a strong forward earnings outlook.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “@RealGambler is that the cig he gives you after he’s finished signing you up for his newsletter? $MU $NVDA” — The post is a generic, non-substantive mention of NVIDIA that does not advance a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “SpaceX Is Borrowing $40B For Nvidia Chips” — SpaceX's large chip purchase indicates strong demand for Nvidia's products.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “They must make everybody's 401k look good for midterms so we continue north. After midterms, tech stocks will cook their books to prop the market if need be.” — The attributed thesis alleges coordinated market manipulation to support prices before an election.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$239.24 | Strong Uptrend” — The item reports only a price level and trend without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “3 days straight green” — The item reports a recent price trend without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “@Quensa55 $NVDA, $AMD, $SPCX, $CRWD” — The post lists NVDA and AMD alongside other names without stating a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “companies grow without leveraging debt” — The post advances a bullish thesis that debt is a normal and necessary lever for company growth.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$BTC.X $NVDA” — The item is a bare pairing of Bitcoin and NVIDIA with no substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA Nvidia Stock Price Prediction 2026, 2030, 2040” — The item is only a title referencing long-term price predictions without any stated fundamental or attributed opinion about Nvidia.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “many AI companies still struggle to make these massive investments profitable” — Hayes's thesis is that many AI companies face profitability risk from their massive investments.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “We'll get there no matter what the ups and downs bring our way!” — The post expresses a positive, resilient investor outlook toward the listed semiconductor names.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I’m still in $NVDA” — The post's only company-specific proposition is that the user holds NVDA, which is a neutral observation.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA should go up 5% tomorrow!” — The post is an explicit bullish forward price prediction about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “up by miles afters that space x announcement” — The item is a price-relative observation about NVIDIA rather than a scorable company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “the analysts' $300 price targets” — The post cites a forward analyst price target as a bullish reference point.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “go down” — The post is a price-blind request for a downward move and contains no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “blow-off top/black swan fukshow” — The post advances a strongly bearish thesis that the market is at an extreme top.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Micron Historically Sells Off After Earnings despite great Earnings.” — The historical post-earnings sell-off is a price reaction, not a scorable fundamental proposition.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA futures snd AH are soooooooo fake” — The post asserts that NVDA futures and after-hours trading are unreliable.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$INTC what a stupid over reaction … back over 120 let’s f go
$MU $NVDA $AMD” — The post is a price-focused reaction to Intel that does not provide a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA remains on watch” — The item reports only a neutral observation about NVIDIA's share price without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA stays on watch” — The item reports NVDA's price status without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “THE Stock I’m Watching TODAY!” — The post lists NVDA as a watched stock but offers no substantive directional proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SOXX buy SOXL NOW BEFORE 7am $NVDA” — The item is a generic premarket trading call that does not state a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “own it dont trade it imo” — The user's attributed view is a positive, long-term ownership thesis.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “SpaceX in talks to borrow $40B—its revenue size—to buy Nvidia chips” — A proposed multi-billion-chip purchase indicates strong potential demand for Nvidia's products.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA will be deep red today” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “fucking garbage to trade” — The user characterizes NVIDIA as extremely difficult to trade.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Everything is red today, not just BURU , $ETH , $CCL , $SPCXX.X , $NVDA just to name a few” — The item describes a broad market decline and includes NVDA only as an example, without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “what did we learn from the last few earnings?” — The item is a neutral question about earnings without a stated fundamental conclusion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “30 days to E/R, buy, buy and bye 4 awhile maybe by open B bck w/U” — The item presents a bullish analyst thesis centered on an upcoming earnings date and a buy recommendation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I smell blood$NDAQ $QQQ $NVDA” — The post is a price-blind observation of investor attention to NVDA without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “nothing does started to feel like i shouldve taken the opportunity to sell it all yesterday” — The item is a price-blind reflection on a past share-price move rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA never does” — The item is a bare, contextless assertion about NVDA's price movement with no stated reason or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA not looking good” — The item is a negative social observation about NVIDIA, but the production contract requires an explicit bullish topic to be emitted; therefore no topic is recorded.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$SPCX wants about $10B in bank loans and $30B in debt, led by $APO, to fund a large $NVDA AI chip order.” — A large SpaceX order for NVIDIA AI chips indicates strong demand for NVIDIA's products.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “they didn't just beat they obliterated estimates” — The post describes NVIDIA's earnings as substantially exceeding estimates.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “SpaceX is talking to banks about borrowing 40 billion to buy Nvidia chips” — The proposed financing to purchase Nvidia chips indicates substantial demand for Nvidia's products.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “guess a 40 billion purchase from spacex doesn't move the needle” — The item asserts that a proposed SpaceX acquisition is not materially significant to NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA made 7k on this in a month” — The reported monthly gain is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [news] “this quintessential AI stock”
— The item characterizes Nvidia as an AI stock without providing a directional fundamental or attributed opinion.Should You Buy Nvidia Stock in October? +0.70 [social_text] “SpaceX reportedly is looking to borrow as much money as the company generates in revenue to buy Nvidia chips” — SpaceX's reported intent to purchase Nvidia chips at a scale comparable to its revenue indicates strong demand for Nvidia's products.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “this is a smorgasbord of buying opportunity out there” — The author characterizes the recent technical downturn as a strong buying opportunity.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$NVDA so toxic for my health lol” — The post expresses a strongly negative personal sentiment toward NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA going to below 100 if the plague thing gets serious” — The item is a conditional prediction of share-price movement, which is explicitly price-blind and carries no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “the AI bubble may "burst" soon.” — Dalio's attributed thesis warns of a near-term AI bubble burst, a negative forward opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “wow dumping since yesterday looks like that was the top no recoveey here” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “why are we suddenly pretending to care about enron circular financing when we were just 245” — The post is a rhetorical question about investor attention to a past scandal and a prior price level, without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA might touch $229 again before it reverses” — The item is a price-level forecast without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “Nvidia Director Tops AI Billionaires on Insider Stock Sales” — Heavy insider selling by a top Nvidia executive is a negative attributed signal about the company.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “good day to buy dips” — The item presents a neutral price-level observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Microsoft, $NVDA Nvidia CEOs to unveil new AI laptop at San Francisco event” — The item reports an upcoming product event without stating a positive or negative outcome for Nvidia.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “AI 🤖 Bubble 🤫” — The post expresses a bearish view that the AI theme is overvalued.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SRFM $SPY $NVDA $PLTR $AAPL NEVER FORGET!!!” — The item is a generic multi-stock shoutout that does not advance a substantive sentiment proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$INTC they better keep flashing this all across the CNBC ticker today after the graping 🍇 we all got yesterday.
$NVDA $MU $AMD
$APLD earnings after the bell I’m long” — The post is a general market/social observation mentioning multiple companies without a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “bullish chart by the way” — The author presents a bullish technical outlook for CRWV.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “once it starts down it will keep going” — This is a price-movement observation without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “my blood is boiling this morning” — The post expresses strong personal emotion but provides no company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion to score.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$170?” — The item is a price-level question about NVIDIA with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “SpaceX plans to raise $40 billion to purchase Nvidia’s AI chips.” — A large, explicitly planned purchase of Nvidia AI chips is a strong positive demand proposition.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “$NVDA really really bad” — The post expresses a strongly negative attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “they sold you the ai hype but really its just data centers lol” — The item characterizes Nvidia's data-center business as hype-driven rather than fundamentally strong.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “looks like plague will not let it hit $270 before earnings” — The item is a price-target observation without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “$NVDA shorts gonna go silent in a minute” — The post predicts a near-term reduction in short interest, a bullish attributed market view.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Today's the agents selected $NVDA and $CRWD.” — The item reports a neutral selection of NVIDIA for a trading demonstration without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “SpaceX is in talks to borrow $40 billion to buy Nvidia chips.” — The reported acquisition talks indicate potential future demand for Nvidia chips.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “This sucker is going to puke at open” — The attributed bearish thesis anticipates a sharp adverse opening move.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “a typical of a moronic bear who thinks all chips are same chips” — The user's dismissive characterization is an attributed bearish opinion on the distinctiveness of NVIDIA's chips.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 230 today” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$233 today or tomorrow?” — The item is a price-level speculation with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 235 today?” — The item is only a price-level question with no substantive fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “SpaceX is looking to double its long term debt in one large debt offering. All to buy GPU's from $NVDA.” — SpaceX's planned large debt offering to purchase more NVIDIA GPUs indicates strong demand for NVIDIA's products.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “there's some kind of deal between $MSFT & $NVDA too” — The item asserts a possible deal but provides no substantive details or direction for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “this is actually my buy zone” — The author explicitly identifies the current price region as a bullish buying opportunity.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Nvidia’s $100 Billion Dealmaking Juggernaut” — The headline describes Nvidia's dealmaking activity but provides no directional assessment of its impact.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “flash crash to $236.47” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “huge gap lower” — The item reports a large downward price move without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Michael Burry was not wrong after all” — The post attributes a negative investment thesis to Michael Burry without stating what that thesis is.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “this ai revolution is accelerating” — The author's opinion that the AI revolution is accelerating is a positive attributed forward view.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA shut up witz and listen to Leopold!” — The post is a company-specific call to attention but contains no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA boom!” — The item is only a bullish price observation with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The voice of reason is on Bloomberg right now! Simon Leopold my friend!!!” — The post is a positive reaction to Bloomberg coverage but does not state a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Many delays and now additional Force Majeure. With many names priced at or near perfection, roacky roads ahead” — The attributed thesis warns of execution delays, force majeure risk, and extreme valuation for the AI trade.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I popped into the control room and here is Simon!!!!!!” — The post is a bare, celebratory mention of NVDA without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “another junk junk like $SOUN strung out on what the dung huang of $NVDA decides to do with the junk.” — The post expresses a strongly negative attributed opinion about NVIDIA's management and its impact on the company.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “this 5 star analyst from Raymond Jaymes” — The item attributes a favorable analyst opinion to a specific price target.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “He predicts $550 in 12 months.” — The attributed bullish 12-month price target is a strong positive forward opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “236. is on deck.” — The item reports a specific share price level without stating a fundamental reason or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA dead money” — The phrase is a negative attributed opinion, but it is not a scorable fundamental or forward-looking thesis about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA snagged em near the lows” — The item reports a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “these will tank semi's” — The post asserts a bearish outlook for the semiconductor sector.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “It's barely off its ATH.” — The item reports only a price-level observation with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA such an easy shit” — The item is a target-specific expression of investor sentiment, but it contains no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “This has turned from an investment and into just another day trading stock!” — The item characterizes NVDA's trading style but offers no directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I never miss here beside like maybe once or twice” — The user's statement is a personal trading observation without a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Bull cycle about to start !!!” — The author explicitly forecasts a bullish cycle for Bitcoin.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Looked like it was headed to green but now look!” — The item describes a reported share-price move without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “unload AI bubble” — The post characterizes NVIDIA's AI valuation as a bubble to be sold.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Suppose you build a model with a 51% win rate and a 1.6 Sharpe ratio.” — The hypothetical model discussion is not a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “always climbs to higher place no matter how ugly it looks” — The user's observation of repeated higher highs is a bullish technical pattern.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA ez pz shorts” — The item is a brief, non-substantive observation about short interest without a stated directional opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “this is bullish AF for the 3” — The author explicitly states a strongly bullish attributed opinion on NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 235?” — The item is a price-level question with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA rates down and oil down and this can’t catch a bid…” — The post asserts that NVDA lacks buying support and is underperforming.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “buying $NVDA at a 5 trillion valuation” — The attributed opinion treats a $5T valuation as an easy buy, a strongly bullish forward view.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “You’re paying a premium growth multiple for a mature hardware company that’s late to AI and copying...” — The attributed thesis compares Apple's valuation and competitive position negatively, and the item is included for that company-specific comparison.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA +25%” — The item reports only a share-price move, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The chop is making me crazy!” — The item describes only NVDA's price volatility without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$AMD $NVDA not posting on webull anymore....” — The complaint about Webull's availability is a neutral observation of investor attention to these companies.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “240 calls !” — The post expresses a bullish call option thesis on NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “TRILLIONS ARE BEING WASTED ON AI DATA CENTERS” — Arthur Hayes's thesis that AI data-center investment is wasteful is a strongly negative attributed opinion on NVIDIA's core market.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “half covered” — The phrase describes a partial position change rather than a substantive fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$MU 1100+ today is getting highly probable” — The item is a bullish prediction about Micron's share price, not a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$MU Looking like a blowout earnings report based on everything we know so far” — The item is a price-blind expectation of Micron's earnings, not a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “current positions all shorts” — The user's disclosure of short positions is a neutral observation and does not constitute a scorable opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “The company combines explosive, innovation-led growth with a surprisingly low valuation of just 24 times forward earnings” — The attributed thesis combines strong growth with a favorable valuation, presenting a positive investment case.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 100% gainer” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The savior of the market always pumps” — The item presents a neutral observation of NVDA's market behavior without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Burry is a fucking joke.” — The item is a general attack on a contrarian investor rather than a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 240 CALL .08 (LOTTO)” — The item is a price-blind call-option trade note with no substantive fundamental or attributed-opinion proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 240 CALL .08 (LOTTO)” — The item is a price-blind call-option trade note with no substantive fundamental or attributed-opinion proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$QQQ” — The item's only company-specific proposition is that NVDA remains a constituent of the QQQ index, which is a neutral observation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX and $NVDA $$$$$” — The post is a bare mention of NVIDIA with no substantive company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA +25%” — The item reports only NVIDIA's share-price movement, which is explicitly neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA short” — The post is a bare short-interest mention without a stated thesis or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “if this hits 242.5 calls (expiring today ) by 1-2 pm
What could the premiums hit?” — The item is a speculative question about a potential intraday price level and option premiums rather than a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA shoudl be up 49 on the news” — The item is only a price-based expectation without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “the chart looks amazing... long and strong.” — The post offers an explicitly bullish technical assessment of NVIDIA's share chart.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “you are in wrong business” — The post asserts that NVIDIA's business is fundamentally misaligned.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “if it closes about 1100 a day then it could run up and reclaim 1255” — The item is a price-level breakout observation with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion about Micron.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “VCI Global Secures US$22 Million Sovereign AI Infrastructure Contract Featuring NVIDIA -Powered Encrypted Compute Stack” — The contract demonstrates demand for NVIDIA-powered encrypted compute infrastructure.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “It’s testing previous ATHs” — Testing a prior all-time high is a price-level observation with no directional sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “$NVDA buy buy buy if you have any cash left.” — The post expresses a strongly bullish trading opinion on NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPY futures showing a massive wall of resistance.” — The item describes a broad-market technical level without a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.40 [news] “gets a hold and is recommended to use only as a small satellite position alongside an existing Nvidia holding”
— The ETF is recommended only as a small satellite position, indicating a limited role rather than a strong standalone conviction.NVII: Weekly Nvidia Income With A Plan Attached +0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 🗑️” — The post is a bare negative reaction to NVIDIA with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “There are no shortage of banks and corporate debt buyers that believe in AI boom.” — The item states broad institutional belief in the AI boom, which supports NVIDIA's AI-related business.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA closed out my calls and cov puts at the open” — The item describes the author's own options trading activity, not a company fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA feels so heavy it just wants to drop” — The item is a price-minded observation with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion to score.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “This will be above 175 come tomorrow.” — The author makes an explicit bullish price forecast for NVDA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA bullish here” — The item expresses a bullish opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$MU CALLS UP $1.2K PER CONTRACT” — The item reports a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “break even $NVDA” — The item reports a neutral break-even trading result for NVIDIA with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “the fun hasn’t even started yet bulls lol” — The post expresses a strongly bullish forward opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$MU Closing in on $1,100” — The item reports a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I'm not even in $NVDA.” — The post is a neutral observation about the author's position rather than a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA new all time highs coming” — The item reports a forward price-level observation without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “trades lower than where it opens every fucking day.” — The item reports only a recurring intraday price pattern, which is a neutral observation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Crbs : total cash per share $33.35
Nvda: total cash per share $2.59
AMD: total cash per share $8.03” — The item reports per-share cash for Cerebras, NVIDIA, and AMD but offers no directional judgment about NVIDIA's cash position.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Cbrs : % held by institutions 79.41%
Nvda: % held by institutions 71.40%
Amd : % held by institutions 75.34%” — The item reports institutional ownership percentages for NVDA and peers but offers no directional assessment of NVDA's ownership or its implications.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “nvidia-and-micron-are-about-to-dominate-earnings-season” — The item is a generic headline about an upcoming earnings season rather than a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA gonna start heading back to 232” — The item is a price prediction and therefore carries no directional sentiment under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$INTC and $NVDA long, $AMZN short again new positions” — The post states new long and short positions but gives no company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “best fundamentals” — The attributed fundamental assessment is strongly positive.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Technically NVDA has outperformed QQQ by ~250 bps.” — The item reports only relative share-price performance, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA just hit a new 52-week high!
💥 NVIDIA touched $243.37 on Tuesday.
📈 Shares have soared 28.5% YTD, beating the tech sector’s 24.1% gain.” — The item reports only a historical price high and relative performance, which are neutral observations.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “It's still a buy.” — The author explicitly endorses NVDA as a buy within a technology growth model.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “look at these disgusting wicks” — The item describes a price pattern but provides no fundamental or attributed opinion to score.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “get ready for another dump girls” — The post expresses a strongly bearish social opinion about NVIDIA's near-term price action.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$300 by EOY” — The post asserts a bullish forward price target for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “I thought Jensen was buying back the stock?! LOL what a scam!” — The post expresses a strongly negative attributed opinion that Jensen's purported stock buyback is disingenuous.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “A day after the S&P 500 hit an all-time high, the trend on Wall Street reverses sharply” — The item describes a broad market reversal without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 🤣🤣” — The post is a bare mention of NVIDIA with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “outperformed by amd AGAIN!!!!” — The item reports AMD-relative share performance, which is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “If you invested $10,000 in Nvidia a decade ago, you would now have...
$1,430,000” — The item reports Nvidia's historical investment return, which is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$OLB $TYGO $NVDA $MU $SNDK called it” — The post is a generic callout of multiple tickers without a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Lowest in 2 years” — The item reports only a historical share-volume observation with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Market is liking the FED NOTE” — The item expresses only positive market sentiment toward a Federal Reserve note, without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA EOD 238.50” — The item reports only a closing price without any fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “they not letting it rise to let options expire” — The attributed motive describes a reported price movement without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Never buy a gap-up in a bear market.” — The attributed trading rule is a general market-discipline observation and does not state a directional fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Federal Reserve officials expect they will raise interest rates again before the end of the year to head off inflation that has run above target for more than five years” — The item reports a general Fed rate-hike expectation without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA weak POS” — The item reports only a price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “literally no fear shorting or getting puts in this” — The post expresses a strong attributed opinion that shorting and buying puts in NVIDIA is not feared.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “Ai stocks are poisonous at current stage due to bubble burst.” — The attributed thesis characterizes AI equities as dangerously overvalued due to a bubble.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “damn fucked” — The item expresses an intensely negative attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “why no one watching” — The post is a neutral observation that Microsoft and Nvidia are receiving little attention.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA sob” — The post is a brief, non-substantive mention of NVIDIA that conveys no directional company proposition.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$NVDA absolutely brutal chart. Obvious head and shoulders on the monthly” — The identified monthly head-and-shoulders pattern is a bearish technical formation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA green!” — The item reports only a price movement without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “233 might not come” — The author's skepticism about a specific price target is not a scorable attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “ding, ding, ding,ding, ding, ding” — The celebratory repetition is a generic social reaction without a stated fundamental proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “very very small range (ATR) for $NVDA” — The narrow ATR range is a neutral observation of NVDA's price behavior.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I traded $NVDA up from 2012 through 2022 but I never held for mare than a few days.” — The item reports a historical trading approach without a substantive company-specific sentiment proposition.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA naw wrong way son” — The post expresses a negative opinion about NVIDIA's direction.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “open short covering and selling going on to close positions before the end of the day” — The described trading activity is a price observation without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 2.2 million” — The item reports a market-volume observation for NVIDIA without a substantive directional proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the heck was that?” — The post is a price-blind reaction to an unexplained move and contains no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “the mindset has changed to a positive bias” — The author states a positive trading bias for NVIDIA through the midterm elections.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA just spiked higher” — The item reports only a share-price move without a stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “im tired of Dan Ives and Tom Lee lol” — The user expresses negative sentiment toward two prominent bullish analysts.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA doing something pos” — The item is a price-blind observation of positive share movement without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$NVDA delusion” — The item explicitly characterizes investor sentiment toward NVIDIA as delusional.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$245 coming‼️” — The post asserts a specific bullish price target for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA pump money into boostrun now” — The post speculates about investor activity around a different company, not about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA delusion” — The item explicitly characterizes investor sentiment around NVIDIA as delusional.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA delusion” — The item characterizes investor sentiment toward NVIDIA as delusional.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “after hours gonna rally hard” — The item is a price prediction about after-hours movement and contains no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$10 up day coming very soon if we close above previous all time high 237 and change” — The item is a conditional prediction of share-price movement, which is price-blind and carries no directional sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “when sndk runs towards earnings” — The item only reports a potential price move for Micron without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Waiting to see reach 245, 250 , or 300?” — The item only discusses potential future price levels for NVDA without a substantive fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [news] “Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) went nowhere for most of a year, then broke out in August and now trades at a record high.”
— The item describes Nvidia's historical and record share-price movement without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.Nvidia (NVDA): Is There Still Room to Run? +0.80 [social_text] “this is going to the moon” — The author expresses a strongly bullish forward price view for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “I am thinking far too low raymond for the 260” — The user's bullish price target is an attributed forward opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “$NVDA 260 by EOY is my predicition.” — The user's explicit year-end price target is a strongly bullish forward opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA $TSLA $MXL $IOVA $MRVL” — The post lists NVDA among several tickers without providing a substantive company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “My short entries were near perfect yesterday but I had about 5 minutes after open today to get out with the bulk of my profits.” — The post describes a short trader's execution and exit, not a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPCX just made $NVDA bankroll!” — The item reports a share-price outcome without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SMCI let’s go Charles! $INTC $NVDA” — The post is a generic bullish cheer that mentions NVDA only as an incidental ticker without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$QQQ $SPY $SOXL” — The item lists broad-market and sector ETFs without any substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “raised its Seagate price target from $1,193 to $1,588, roughly a 33% increase” — The analyst's substantially higher price target is a strongly positive forward opinion on Seagate.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “if this pulls back to 230s.. buy imo” — The user's conditional buy recommendation is a bullish attributed trading opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPY $QQQ $AMD $NVDA” — The post lists NVDA among several broad market and peer tickers without a substantive company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “up from there don't see it going below 230 with out major swan story” — The author's technical view that NVDA is unlikely to fall below 230 absent a major negative event is a bullish attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “this overvalued garbage” — The attributed investor opinion characterizes NVIDIA as excessively overvalued.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$AAPL $MSFT $NVDA” — The mention lists NVDA alongside other names without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Interesting to see Elon and Jenseng. Congrats, but why leave #ripple $XRP.X Ceo Brad ?” — The post is a general comment about Ripple leadership that does not present a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$QQQ $AAPL $NVDA $SPY” — The item lists NVDA as a component of the QQQ index without providing a substantive company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Yields Retreat As Stocks Slip” — The item reports a general market move that includes NVDA but provides no company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “I am very convicted.” — The author expresses strong bullish conviction about Rocket Lab, not NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “I have high conviction in this one.” — The author explicitly expresses a strongly bullish conviction about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The war is long over” — The attributed conclusion is a generic market-wide sentiment claim that does not bear on NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “⬇️” — The item reports a share-price decline without stating a company-specific fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA Rebound today” — The item reports only a share-price rebound without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Come on with it now.” — The post is a generic, non-directional call to action that does not state a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$IBM $NVDA are both going to have great runs by end of year!” — The item offers an explicitly bullish forward opinion on NVIDIA's year-end performance.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA let’s show them something 🤐” — The post expresses a bullish, forward-looking investor sentiment toward NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 220 by Friday?” — The item is a price-target question that does not state a substantive fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “hope to see an open at 233 or lower” — The item is a price-level expectation rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA looks like it just blew below the lower bollinger band on the 1 week” — A Bollinger-band break is a technical price observation and carries no directional sentiment under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Absolute doody!” — The item is a bare, nonsensical remark that does not state a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA Nvidia Stock Price Prediction 2026, 2030, 2040” — The item is only a headline about future price predictions, which is a price observation and not a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “they are literally replicating the daily chart in a smaller scale” — The item describes a share-price technical pattern without a stated fundamental or attributed directional opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA $AMD” — The item is only a bare mention of NVIDIA shares with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “@Bydowntown $NVDA $AMD” — The post mentions NVDA but offers no substantive company-specific proposition, so it is not a scorable item.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Just market being the market.” — The item offers no company-specific proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “After the monster 2026 run, Seagate has cooled off and is now testing a key $790–$805 support zone. RSI near 41–42 shows momentum has reset without reaching extreme oversold territory.” — The technical setup is presented as a bullish intermediate opportunity.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “A high-volume breakout above $890 could put the $1,145 ATH back in play.” — The identified breakout scenario is explicitly bullish for Seagate.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA gap fill done? So up from now?” — The item is only a price-level observation with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Yesterdays earnings confirmed at least bull case” — The author's bullish thesis is presented as confirmed by the cited earnings.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “perma $NVDA bulls” — The user explicitly identifies themselves as a persistent bullish sentiment holder for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA lost 235 its over…” — The truncated item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “WTF FUD did they come up with how!?! lol every damn time” — The post expresses strong disagreement with a negative narrative about NVIDIA, indicating bullish investor sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “where are you delusional Nvda Bulls?!!!!” — The post explicitly invokes bullish sentiment while challenging the bullish community.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Make it a great day winners of the NVDA type!!!” — This is a generic, non-substantive cheer that does not present a scorable company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.90 [social_text] “The numbers will be a full on blowout like Nvidia has never done before” — The author's attributed opinion predicts an exceptionally strong earnings result.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “after hours and futures are legit pointless” — The item is a price-blind observation of after-hours and futures activity with no scorable fundamental proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I was nice yesterday but today bydowntown was good enuf to tell me 120 is next for Nvidia shares” — The item is a price-based prediction without a stated fundamental or attributed opinion to score.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$NVDA sub 120 on the way” — The post expresses a bullish forward price target for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA” — The item is only a bare mention of NVIDIA's share price with no substantive proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “It has been going up like never before in my life” — The post describes only a historical share-price observation, which is explicitly neutral.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “always short this pig” — The post expresses a strongly bearish attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [news] “its valuation has undergone a significant reset, with its forward multiple near decade lows”
— The attributed valuation assessment describes a significant reset to historically low forward multiples.Nvidia: The Top AI Stock Is On Sale +0.00 [social_text] “finally $NVDA short is motion” — The item reports a short-interest movement without stating a directional fundamental implication.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA can someone give nvda some blue chew plz” — The post is a price-blind request for attention rather than a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA trash man won’t pump like memory” — The item is a price-related observation about NVIDIA with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “u have been a good boy but u can do better than this” — The post expresses a moderately positive but forward-looking opinion that NVIDIA has performed well but could improve.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The bears are either trembling and crying in their basements right now, or desperately praying for a miracle” — The item is a price-blind observation of investor reaction to Palantir rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about Palantir.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “can we get some juice to hit over 237” — The post is a price-target question about a specific share-price level and carries no fundamental or attributed-opinion signal.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA sold puts on low then went calls, now back in puts.” — The item describes only NVDA's share-price movement without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “NVIDIA day trade is up 145%” — The item reports only a historical share-price move, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “they just trying to lure some more suckers 32k calls at 235$ will expire tomorrow” — The attributed bearish thesis that the call activity is a trap is a forward-looking opinion about the trade.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “NOT GOOD !” — The item expresses a negative reaction to the listed symbols but provides no company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “when a stock retraces off its ath and comes down maybe 1-5% it will resume higher” — The author presents a technical thesis that a temporary pullback will lead to further upside.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$250” — The item reports only a share price level without any substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA reloading puts here” — The item reports a share-price action without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the usual downtrend has slowly begun” — The item reports a price downtrend without a stated fundamental reason, so it is a neutral observation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I can see it bouncing back today and tomorrow!!” — The item is a bullish observation of share-price movement, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “BUY THE DIP AND IT WILL RIP !!!” — The post is an explicitly bullish call to buy Nvidia and predicts a sharp upward move.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “breakout confirmed” — The user explicitly confirms a bullish technical breakout for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “We are not going anywhere, but higher in time.” — The item is a price-blind observation of investor attention to IREN rather than a scorable proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Think we shoot for the 244 again” — The user's bullish call speculation is an attributed forward opinion about NVIDIA's price.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA BREAKOUT Confrimed ⭐️” — The item reports a technical breakout, which is a price-based observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “cant move so down it goes” — The item reports only a price movement without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Alawys great to "lie" when you have receipts from teh idiot who said it.” — The post is a generic social reaction to a prior dispute and does not present a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “WE heading above 240” — The item reports a price level above 240 without stating a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “WAY too many people will make quick, easy boatloads of cash from NVDA's earnings date.” — The item speculates about a potential earnings reaction but offers no stated fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “if youre following me or anyone else around & make on trade on what someone else is doing then get upset about it, troll him then run & block when you get called out you're not a Trader, you're a Perma-Bull fool” — The post is a general trading-ethics rant that mentions NVDA only as a tagged ticker, without a substantive proposition about the company.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I caught some $NVDA” — The post reports a personal trading outcome without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “any pos bearish?” — The user's question asserts that the position is already maximally bearish.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “1/1 for the day⬇️ $NVDA $SPY” — The item reports only a one-day share-price observation for NVIDIA with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA back to 240✅” — The item reports only a share-price level without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “big ass taco to drop yield and pump stocks but no effect so far” — The item reports a bond-yield/stock relationship but finds no observed effect on NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “@RoniToni lol no moving the right direction buddy try again $NVDA sucks” — The post expresses a strongly negative social opinion about NVIDIA's direction and performance.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “can’t even pump on taco Trump” — The item reports a share-price reaction to a political event without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Casual 15th consecutive earnings beat” — A 15th consecutive earnings beat is a strong positive operating result.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$AAPL We've said all day money will flow into $AAPL” — The item is a substantive but directionless observation about Apple's investor attention; the rest is generic trading commentary.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “pretty weak to pop to all time highs and fade the rest of the week” — The item describes only NVDA's reported price movement and momentum, which is explicitly neutral.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$NVDA buy it at 231 or if over 237. There’s like a 85% chance this pays and Oct 23rd or 30th calls print well over 100%” — The author presents a strongly bullish options-based thesis with an explicit high-probability payoff expectation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “These numbers are getting crazy. $10 T here we come. LOL. low of large numbers unstoppable.” — The post expresses skepticism about the scale of market valuations but does not make a scorable claim about NVIDIA specifically.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPY has head and shoulders pattern on 5 day chart and $NVDA has the same pattern also” — The identified chart pattern is a price-based technical observation with no stated fundamental direction for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “remember when this stalls, it’s about to fall” — The item is a price-based prediction without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 234 eod!?” — The item reports only a closing price observation without a substantive fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “This thing is really bad” — The post expresses a strongly negative attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this has a after lunch push-up” — The item is a price prediction and contains no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Bury still breathing through a straw right now” — The attributed bearish thesis is presented as an incorrect characterization of NVIDIA's condition.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Jensen better get the hell out of Washington and get back to work, our stock is tanking.” — The post urges Jensen to return to work and links that absence to a severe negative investor reaction.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “looking for pull back of 210-220 to get back in” — The item describes a price range and entry idea without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Say thank you for the dip, buy it, then head outside to enjoy the fall weather.” — The attributed investment thesis treats the dip as a buying opportunity.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$AAPL $QQQ $NVDA lmao stop embarrasing yourself dude” — The item is a generic, non-substantive social post that mentions NVDA without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “LoL only complete imbeciles are still long at this point.” — The post expresses an extremely negative attributed opinion about investors who remain long NVDA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA will be a 5% drop today?” — The item is only a speculative observation about a potential share-price move, which is not scorable.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA out for 5%✅” — The item reports only a share-price move, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA $MU who fought guru Bury and now regrets?” — The post is a rhetorical question about investor attention to Nvidia and Micron without a substantive directional proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “its traded a total on 14m shares folks” — The item reports only a share-volume observation without a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$MU $NVDA go suck on your guru’s 🍆” — The item is hostile social commentary that does not state a substantive fundamental or attributed opinion about either company.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Elevator Down Tomorrow Likely” — The item is a speculative prediction about Micron's share price and contains no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA holy sheet” — The item is a bare, non-substantive mention of NVIDIA without a scorable proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM $NVDA ripper” — The item is only a hyperbolic report of a share-price move, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Time for a spring!” — The item is a price-blind observation of share movement with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “pathetic attempt lol” — The post expresses a strongly negative attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA back down she goes” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable underlying reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 245” — The item reports only a share price level without a substantive fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “if pops off 230 or new low” — The item is a conditional observation about NVIDIA's share price without a stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA PINNED SESSION LOWS 3rd time at 230” — The item reports only a session-level price observation with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Back to the same old same old.” — The item is a neutral observation of NVDA's share-price behavior without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA too many calls bought today” — The post reports a trading-day call activity observation without a substantive fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “These are now 1.20 from 0.44” — The item reports only a share-price move, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$PLTR this post was the day before last ER CC @ $140 PLTR!!!” — The post reports a historical earnings-related price level for Palantir, which is not a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Bear sinking teeth into $NVDA” — The bearish comment describes a price reaction without stating a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA hahahahha call buyers hahahaha 😂😂😂😂😂 have a good long holiday weekend! lol cancel that trip lmao” — The post is a humorous, non-substantive reaction to NVDA that does not present a scorable company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “You get less for the money with GPT Codex than with Claude Code.” — The comparison concerns OpenAI and xAI models, not NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$NVDA Looks super ugly” — The post expresses a strongly negative attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.50 [social_text] “Some potential investors reportedly became more cautious over concerns that existing shareholders could sell large stakes soon after the listing, adding to doubts over what some viewed as an aggressive valuation.” — Investor caution and doubts about Firmus's valuation are negative attributed opinions.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Sam Altman is the least trustworthy person in the AI stratosphere” — The attributed opinion targets AI leadership generally rather than NVIDIA specifically.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Another great DCA day for long term investors :)” — The author's positive characterization of the day as favorable for long-term investors indicates bullish sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “how do i not have 10,000 followers ?” — The post is a self-referential comment about follower count rather than a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPY Im going to have to deal with this idiot @Trading105 all week?” — The post is a price-blind social complaint about another trader's behavior, not a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “this fuckin crooked as market is saying that a non public company losing tons of money will affect Nvidia” — The author characterizes the market's valuation reaction to a loss-making company as corrupt and damaging to Nvidia.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “time to load up bag.” — The item is a price-blind call to accumulate shares, which is a neutral target-specific observation rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “i hate this fucking stock!!!!!” — The user expresses extreme negative sentiment toward NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA red Friday” — The item reports only a share-price movement, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “a chance to add at a lower price” — The post describes a lower share price as an opportunity to add, which is a neutral price observation.
stocktwits
-0.50 [social_text] “investors reassessed AI growth expectations” — The revised OpenAI revenue figure prompted a downward reassessment of AI growth expectations.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Yes, ai is probably a bubble” — The author characterizes the AI market as probably a bubble, a negative attributed valuation opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “More Red” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The stock pulls back 3%” — The item reports a share-price move without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$AMD recently hit $658.52 before pulling back to $620.68.” — The item reports AMD's historical price movement without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPY any scary dip buyers nibbling ? 📚💸🎬
$NVDA $AMD” — The post is a generic market question that mentions NVDA only as an incidental tag without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “they did some damage here today” — The item reports only a price move without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “not that good of a day for price action” — The item reports a negative price day without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “bounce downward” — The item is only a price-direction prediction with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$QQQ $NVDA $SOXX $TQQQ $SPY” — The item lists NVDA alongside broad and sector ETFs without stating a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NOK to the moon 🥂🇫🇮🍀 $SPCX $NVDA” — The post is a generic bullish cheer that mentions NVDA only as part of a list, without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “large tutes and even $NVDA with massive shakes” — The item describes NVDA's share-price volatility without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Many loading up on $SPCX $NVDA dips” — The post reports investor activity around NVIDIA but offers no directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “All of these paid bashers and manipulators. LMFAO. All of the jokers today!” — The post is a price-blind, generic rant about market participants rather than a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “CRWV tomorrow 95+” — The item is a bullish prediction about CRWV's share price, not about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Fall 2026 Snapshot Of The S&P 500's Market Cap $NVDA $AAPL $MSFT $AMZN $GOOGL” — The item presents a market-cap snapshot of several companies without a substantive directional proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$TDG .....🤑 $NVDA $PLTR ....🚀” — The post is a bare mention of NVIDIA with no substantive company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “its notnthat its 50 its that it isnt 100 billion” — The post argues Nvidia's market value is materially below the author's stated target.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA well wtf then” — The post is a bare, nonspecific reaction to NVIDIA with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “sooooo tomorow we pump?” — The post is a speculative question about a future price move and contains no substantive fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_engagement] “peak 167 mentions, best rank 3 over 221 snapshots” — Peak mention volume and ranking are neutral observations of investor attention without a directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
apewisdom
social engagement level (554) +0.09
+0.00 [social_text] “He can afford to drop $5 million that’s pocket change for him” — The statement is a general observation about Michael Burry's financial capacity, not a scorable proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “will mu sndk nvdia be bullish until 2028?” — The item poses a bullish question about multiple companies without stating a directional opinion on NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Burry in the news shorting these again” — The post attributes a bearish short thesis to Burry for Micron.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA on today's map at 21” — The item reports NVDA's position on a quality-score map without a substantive directional opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this prints” — The item is only a speculative question about a price move, which is not scorable sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Today’s the day we finally gonna close above 230?! Sure looks like it…” — The item is a price-level observation with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Let's go!” — The exclamation is a bullish reaction to the listed names, but it provides no company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion to score.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “These 3 are my bus ticket home.” — The post is a personal trading account update that mentions NVDA only as part of a generic basket.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “where will we be in the morning?” — The item is only a speculative question about future price movement and contains no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Q3 Earnings On Track For 8th Consecutive Quarter Of Double-Digit Growth” — The attributed earnings trajectory indicates sustained double-digit growth across eight consecutive quarters.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA slowly but surely” — The item is a price-focused observation without a stated fundamental reason or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA Nvidia Stock Price Prediction 2026, 2030, 2040” — The item is only a headline about future price predictions; no stated fundamental or attributed opinion is provided.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “It’s not stopping in overnight price” — The item reports overnight price movement without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Cheers to all the holders out there! 8 more hours until we see how it all plays out.” — The post is a celebratory, non-directional observation about NVDA holders awaiting an event.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Futures stomping!” — The item reports only a futures price move without a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Lagging the sector even in AH” — The item reports only relative share-price performance, which is explicitly neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “It’s levels to this” — The post describes NVDA's share-price level without stating a directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$INTC $MU $NVDA $SNDK $SPY stoopid if you think this is because of micron” — The item is a price-blind, target-aware observation of investor sentiment without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SOXS us treasury spikes good bye $SOXL $NVDA” — The item reports a sector performance observation without a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the market doesn‘t seem to give a 💩” — The item is a general market observation that does not state a substantive sentiment about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA is it time to clear 235 in October on ! Iren will join the ride . Trump all in” — The post is a speculative price target and bullish sentiment about Nvidia, but it does not state a concrete fundamental reason or attributed analyst opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Today can be EPIC!!!” — The item is a speculative prediction about NVIDIA's share price movement, which is not scorable sentiment.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “The options activity has completely ruined the price action. Everybody and their mother is trading options on this stock, and the excessive volume is keeping the price action terrible.” — The attributed thesis links excessive options activity and volume to poor price action for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Cantor Fitzgerald Reaffirms Overweight on NVIDIA, $350 PT” — Cantor Fitzgerald's reiterated Overweight rating and $350 price target constitute a strongly bullish attributed analyst opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Yardeni blames unwinding of yen carry trade for global bond rout” — The item reports a global bond-market move without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “my thesis focus isn’t on phones, it speaks to packages full system hardware.” — The user's stated thesis favors system hardware over phones, which is a moderately bullish attributed opinion on system hardware.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “Burry is an idiot. Never seen someone campaigning this hard against something just to make a buck.” — The post is a strongly negative attributed opinion about the credibility of a prominent short thesis.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “What I'm Watching
Jobless claims and ISM manufacturing this morning, then the September jobs report Friday as the week's main event and the next real input for the Fed.” — The item lists broad economic data and the Fed as market-wide context without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Nvidia is ALWAYS the best tech stock to buy when you factor in the big picture, including risk/safety.” — The item presents a strong, attributed bullish thesis on Nvidia's overall risk-adjusted investment case.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Apple is the only vertically integrated platform” — The author presents a strong bullish thesis on Apple's unique vertical integration and an anticipated product-driven catalyst.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “They are getting ready for the IPO” — The post's IPO anticipation is not substantively about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Broadcom has agreed to provide Anthropic with up to $42B in financing tied to its AI infrastructure buildout.” — The large financing commitment and expected largest-customer status support a positive view of Broadcom's AI infrastructure business.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “ATH coming today” — The item is a price-level observation with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “some of that $NVDA and $MU money could be used here” — The post speculates about potential capital allocation but offers no substantive evidence or judgment about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$DRAM $INTC BULLISH $AMD $NVDA” — The post explicitly expresses bullish sentiment toward NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPY $BTC.X $BULL $NVDA $SPCX 🇺🇸
😤💎🐂🟩💵🔒” — The post is a bare NVDA mention without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “This manipulated stock is like an ATM !!!” — The attributed characterization of the stock as manipulated and exploitable is a strongly negative forward opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “how many times do the big firms have to say its worth $350 before people hold for gold?” — The post questions the credibility of repeated high valuations, implying skepticism about the stated price target.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 235 today” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA new ATH today?” — The item is only a price-level observation with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$PRFX LET'S GO! 🚀📈🔥💲🪙🤑💰🟢 $AMD " EXTREMELY BULLISH! " $NVDA $TSLA $META” — The post is a generic bullish cheer that mentions NVIDIA without any company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Best 3 months of the year coming up!!” — The author expresses a strongly bullish expectation for NVIDIA's near-term performance.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA!!” — The post is a bare mention of NVIDIA with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA quadruple top” — A 'quadruple top' is a technical price pattern and therefore carries no directional sentiment under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “another loser 232 rejection overnight…
Wait for the pump a few minutes after open then load those 0DTE puts baby!!!!” — The post advances a bearish thesis that NVDA is a loser and that traders should buy puts after a short-term pump.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Nebius just flipped a bullish MACD cross on the line often where the big boys start quietly building before the crowd notices.” — The bullish MACD cross is a stated technical signal interpreted as a positive institutional-building indicator.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Pt raised to $250-$260. Next week $285-$300” — The raised price targets constitute a bullish attributed analyst opinion on NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “#Nvidia, #AMD And #Intel Rise On #Micron #Earnings, So Why Is MU Stock Falling? $MU” — The item reports Micron's share-price movement without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “& stock isnt moving? crazy!!” — The item is a price-blind observation of investor attention to Meta's share movement, which carries no directional sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA massive dump coming at the open” — The item is a price prediction with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion to score.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the slow roll upward for 34 business days until that next blowout ER” — The item describes only a reported share-price movement, which is explicitly neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Trading is hard
Investing is easy” — The item offers a generic trading observation without a specific company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “I’m bullish” — The user expresses a bullish opinion on NVIDIA's price outlook.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “i will wait and see if it breaks all time high” — The item is a price-blind observation of a potential all-time high without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [news] “Cantor Fitzgerald has revealed a bullish outlook on American tech giant NVIDIA, predicting the stock can still climb more than 52% from recent levels amid AI infrastructure demand.”
— Cantor Fitzgerald's bullish outlook and AI-infrastructure demand thesis form a strong positive attributed opinion.NVIDIA Stock Price to Rally Another 52%, Predicts Cantor Fitzgerald +0.00 [social_text] “$228-$232” — The item only reports a price range for NVIDIA without a substantive fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “IV crush from $MU” — The item reports only a relative implied-volatility move, which is a price-related observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA going to pop now or at 10:30am” — The item is a price prediction and contains no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “$150 billion stock buyback alone should boost $NVDA at least two fold” — The attributed thesis is that a very large buyback would substantially increase NVIDIA's value.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA can't wait to play the $230 game all day again” — The item is a price-focused observation about NVIDIA without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “CEREBRAS NEWS ALONE SHOULD BE BOOSTING $NVDA NOW” — The item presents a positive attributed investment thesis linking Cerebras developments to NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$CCXI Leadership to discuss Digit 5, commercial momentum, technology roadmap, scaling strategy and long-term financial opportunity” — The item reports a planned discussion about Nvidia's products and commercial momentum without stating a directional result.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “i’m not feeling it today” — The post expresses a personal, non-fundamental sentiment about NVIDIA without a scorable company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “It's pressing against resistance…” — The item describes a technical price pattern without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Nothing but good news but only dump.” — The post asserts a strongly bullish thesis that only good news is reaching NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$230 is the new $220…which was the new $185” — The item reports only a series of share-price levels without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The high was 236 and we can’t even hit this to reject” — The item reports only a historical price high and a failed attempt to reach it, which is a neutral price observation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “wake me up when we break ATH” — The item is a price-blind observation of a potential all-time high, which carries no directional sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “today watch this 230.96, no entries under for me.” — The item gives a neutral technical observation about NVDA without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Mid-terms will be a disaster for semiconductor stocks.” — The item presents an explicitly negative attributed political outlook for semiconductor stocks.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$AUR $NVDA $BRK.A $UBER” — The item is a bare list of tickers with no substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “finally bought calls here instead of $NVDA” — The author's call purchase expresses a bullish opinion on AMD.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “i am 100% sure of my $AAPL puts” — The user expresses a strong bearish conviction about Apple via a put position.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “The technology will be integrated into Nebius Token Factory, its managed production-inference platform.” — Integration of Inferize's technology into Nebius's managed inference platform is a positive product-development proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “are we going to close up this time” — The post is a price-blind question about a potential closing level rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “about time go go go up !” — The item is a price-blind prediction of upward movement rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$QNC $MU $NVDA” — The post lists NVDA as one of several mentioned tickers without a substantive company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Like taking candy from a baby and” — The item is a price-blind observation of a favorable share-price move with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 235 CALL 10/7 @1.60” — The call option is a speculative trade and does not constitute a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “This was the pump before the biggest dump in our lifetimes.” — The author presents an extreme bearish thesis that a major market decline is imminent.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$2 fast pump” — The item reports only a rapid share-price move without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “close the week at 229.99” — The item reports a specific weekly price target without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “$NVDA bought some calls” — The attributed call purchase is a bullish options thesis for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 20 bucks we dump right back down” — The item reports a short-term price decline without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Can’t wait for MU to start buying back shares.” — The post expresses a positive expectation that Micron will initiate share buybacks.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 240” — The item is only a price-level mention with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “bullish” — The user explicitly expresses a bullish opinion on the listed companies, including NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “it appears to be negatively correlated” — The author's proposition that proximity to POTUS correlates negatively with valuation is a bullish attributed opinion on NVDA's relative valuation.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “This deserves to move higher and not stay in a range” — The user expresses a bullish attributed opinion that NVIDIA's price should rise.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “they are really trying peoples patience up here for a long time now” — The post attributes sustained frustration to NVIDIA's behavior over a long period.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Added to share buyback plan?! LOL on top of the other $80-100 Billions that he hasn’t used !!” — The item treats the proposed buyback as a likely failure to deploy substantial cash, a negative attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Incapable of holding” — The attributed thesis that NVDA cannot hold positions is a strongly negative forward opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “hasnt done shit since then” — The item is a price-blind observation of market performance rather than a scorable proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “🟢 $NVDA 230C Oct 02” — The item reports a specific options contract and activity observation without a stated fundamental or attributed directional opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “did some rinse and repeat yesterday and made money too” — The item describes only a historical price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Nvidia marks largest buyback in history.” — Nvidia's record buyback is a strong positive capital-return and liquidity signal.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA bought 500 more here” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “reports of IBM stock moving higher on an Nvidia partnership centered on AI agent identity added a secondary layer of positive sentiment” — The attributed report presents a positive partnership proposition for Nvidia, even though the item's main sentence describes IBM's reaction.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Turd stock making me so much” — The post expresses strong negative sentiment toward NVIDIA as an investment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Charts are the only thing that matter.” — The item promotes a technical-analysis approach but offers no company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA new lows” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA RSI showing a reversal and volume is climbing” — RSI reversal and rising volume are technical observations of price activity, not a fundamental or attributed directional opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “5 red daily candles in a row” — The item describes a consecutive price decline without stating a company-specific fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Yep !!” — The item is a brief, positive reaction to NVDA but provides no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA Oh yeah ole chaps! 👍” — The post is a generic, positive social remark that does not state a substantive fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “BoA named its top semiconductor picks for 4Q26” — Banking analyst selection of NVDA as a top semiconductor pick is a strongly bullish attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Micron is getting twice as many views as Nvidia today.” — The item reports relative social attention to Nvidia without a substantive directional proposition.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Barclays highlighted a chart from Nvidia indicating at least $30 billion of potential upside to the chipmaker’s revenue from the five largest cloud providers in 2026 and 2027.” — The Barclays-supported revenue outlook identifies substantial upside versus Barclays' current forecasts.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA holding up well” — The item reports only a neutral share-price observation without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Now is the time to get a month away CALL for $MU, i won’t be greedy - 10% profit in the option and I will be out. Stop loss of 2%” — The item describes a neutral trading plan and risk parameters for a different company.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Here’s how we see the midterms playing out and their effects on markets and related policy.” — The item is a general midterm market outlook that does not state a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “easy short never going to 250” — The post asserts that NVIDIA's shares are easily shortable and will not reach $250, a bearish attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA burial or cremation?” — The rhetorical question draws attention to NVIDIA without stating a substantive directional opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “I don’t know why I keep buying calls and wasting money. I see why mfs commit suicide. Never ever getting ahead.” — The author expresses a strongly negative personal conviction that call buying on NVDA is futile and that the market is rigged.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA it’s time” — The item is a brief, non-substantive call to action that does not state a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 232” — The item is only a price-level mention with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA Squeeze em!!! 🚀🚀🚀💰💰💰” — The item is only a bullish price-movement observation with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “that couldn’t be more of a perfect resistance ha” — The post describes a technical resistance level, which is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA ripping rest of day” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this wants to go red” — The item is only a price-direction prediction with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “This is toast.” — The post expresses a strongly bearish opinion about NVIDIA's near-term outlook.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA absolute garbage.” — The item is a strongly negative attributed opinion, but the production schema does not support a negative bullish topic; therefore no scorable topic is emitted.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Maybe next week 🚀 ?” — The item is a speculative question about future share-price movement, which is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “very limited opportunities” — The limited-opportunity observation is neutral and not specific to NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA” — The item is a bare NVDA mention with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “did they just treat her like a 304 ? milked her and left it on the curb?” — The post expresses a strongly negative attributed view that investors have exhausted Nvidia.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Added more, while holding a whole lot of semis long.” — The item reports a neutral position adjustment without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA red close incoming imo” — The item is a price-blind prediction of a negative daily close, which is a reported price movement and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$228” — The item reports only a share price level without any substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “good time to intiate some of those buybacks” — The post argues that current conditions are favorable for initiating share buybacks.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$NVDA as bullish as we want to be” — The item expresses a strongly bullish attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I can almost predict a drop imo …228 by eod imo…” — The item is a price prediction, which is a neutral observation under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “as long as its green” — The item expresses indifference to a reported share-price move, which is not scorable sentiment.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “so so frustrating” — The post expresses frustration about NVIDIA, but provides no specific fundamental or attributed opinion to score.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$NVDA going out to touch some grass because Nvidia is Ass” — The post expresses a strongly negative attributed opinion about Nvidia's performance.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “bulls, you know they are just gonna dump it the last 10 minutes like they always do” — The attributed bearish thesis asserts that bullish traders will be forced to sell near the close.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “the breakout is coming any day or week now” — The author presents a strongly bullish technical thesis anticipating an imminent breakout.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$INTC BULLISH $NVDA” — The post expresses a bullish opinion on NVIDIA, though it also mentions Intel.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “can’t wait for ppl with puts to get wiped out when it breaks through 232” — The item expresses a bullish technical expectation that NVDA will break through a resistance level.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “In literally never fails to make sure everyone on both sides lose.” — The author presents a strongly negative attributed opinion that options trading on names consistently results in losses for both sides.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “i’ll buy calls” — The user explicitly states a bullish call-buying intention toward NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Very rarely does this pump after slow gains…. Just looking at the chart seems bearish” — The item describes only a historical price pattern and a bearish chart observation, which are neutral price observations.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “simply above 230” — The item reports only a price level above a round number, which is a neutral observation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “holding $230” — The item reports a single share price level without a substantive fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “trump iran threats” — The attributed threat is a negative geopolitical risk for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Elliot wave 168-177” — The item reports a technical price range without a substantive fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “This is like totally low volume and strong. Me thinks green close, green post and green pre.” — The item describes only a bullish price pattern without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this one has quietly become a standout” — The item is a neutral observation of investor attention without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Partnership formed on all biggest names in world” — The post asserts a broad partnership among major entities as a positive development for the named companies.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “This should see $240+ tomorrow.” — The attributed forecast is a price prediction, which is a reported market movement and therefore price-blind.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “This has been a really good month for me.” — The user's positive trading experience is a personal observation and not a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA and now she gives it all back.....” — The item reports a share-price move without stating a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “possible repeat of yesterday at the EOB.” — The item only predicts a repeat of a prior price move and provides no fundamental or attributed-opinion basis for direction.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA small gain” — The item reports only a small positive price move for NVIDIA, which is neutral under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “It just keeps going up!” — The item reports only a continuing share-price move, which is explicitly price-blind and directionless.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA not dumping” — The item is a price-blind observation of share movement with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “get ready for the late day💩” — The item expresses a strongly bullish social-market thesis about NVIDIA's late-day price action.
stocktwits
-0.50 [social_text] “These next 2 weeks not looking promising.” — The author expresses a pessimistic outlook for NVIDIA's trading over the next two weeks in an election-related context.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA guys they will frustrate retail before they let this rip. Just watch.” — The attributed thesis describes a future price reaction but provides no stated fundamental reason for it.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA December clearly” — The item is a bare technical observation without a stated directional conclusion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “they will probably only let it be up a dollar” — The item reports a price movement without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “i really hate this stock & CEO” — The user expresses strong negative sentiment toward both the company and its CEO.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 🤡” — The post is a bare mention of NVIDIA with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “the market makers have set the bull trap for this Friday” — The attributed market-maker thesis is a strongly negative forward opinion about an upcoming trading day.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$235 tomorrow??” — The item is only a speculative price prediction with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Dystopia has arrived! Human vs Robot cage fights!!!” — The item expresses a generic dystopian scenario without any company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “The Dude - Rich Ross says NVDA is a Coiled Spring -Ready to take off” — The attributed thesis characterizes NVIDIA as poised for a significant upward move.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA dumpy time” — The item is a price-blind observation of share movement with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the QQQ had a bear trap signal on it Sept 17th and since then been coiling. Think market is going up from here” — The item is a general technical market view that does not bear a substantive sentiment about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [news] “If NVIDIA rises and falls with the market, it adds to a risk those funds already give you.”
— The item presents a neutral market-correlation observation about NVIDIA without a directional fundamental conclusion.Is NVIDIA Stock Increasing Your Market Risk? +0.00 [social_text] “I like your post on the 16th. Good call” — The post is a positive reaction to another user's post, not a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Just look how many 👀 in their followers!!!🔥” — The post describes attention to the stock but offers no substantive bullish or bearish proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I just kept shorting strength and collecting.” — The author's shorting activity is a price reaction and does not constitute a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA selling calls on Nvidia” — The attributed bearish thesis that Nvidia is being sold short is a negative forward opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “the action over the past week is still leaning bullish” — The author characterizes recent trading activity as bullish.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the buy back announcement” — The buyback announcement is a neutral company observation without a stated directional impact.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “i didnt sell out of my puts im screwed” — The user's failure to exit a put position is presented as a materially negative personal investment outcome.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Best performer of mag 7 as of today!” — This is a reported relative performance observation, not a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$AVGO 360-370 tomorrow.” — The item gives an explicit forward price target for Broadcom.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA cause it’s a scam stock!” — The item is a strongly negative attributed opinion about NVIDIA, but the production API path does not emit a separate bullish topic for the same item.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “up 17% year to date” — The item reports only a historical share-price move, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “$RUM has 1/10th of a$Billion in annual revenue” — The comparison is explicitly negative toward RUM's revenue scale.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “gives up gains at the every eod” — The item reports only a recurring end-of-day price decline without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “we have closed above 230” — The item reports a price milestone without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA LFG 🔥” — The post is an enthusiastic but directionless reaction that does not state a substantive fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$NVDA game is rigged .. 5T market cap moves like a penny stock .. same bs everyday” — The post expresses a strongly negative attributed opinion that NVIDIA's market is manipulated and its behavior is unreliable.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “what he is doing so they load on the his shorting a stock” — The post presents a negative attributed thesis about Michael Burry's shorting activity.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “end of day dump” — The item describes only NVDA's reported intraday price move, which is explicitly neutral.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “the only incredibly undervalued play left compared to $META $AAPL $TSLA $NVDA” — The author explicitly characterizes Snap as undervalued relative to a named peer set.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “stock breadth remains abysmal” — The item characterizes broad market breadth as severely deteriorated.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “when will this hit $300” — The item is only a price-target question and contains no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Here’s how we see the midterms playing out and their effects on markets and related policy.” — The item presents a general midterm/market-policy outlook without a specific substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Tracking Wednesday, Sep 30 entries vs Thursday, Oct 1 latest option marks” — The item reports option-mark movements for multiple symbols without a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “if that’s not flagging for a major breakout then what is.” — The author presents a bullish technical interpretation of the chart as a major breakout.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “This has been disclosed for MONTHS:
📄 APRIL: AVGO disclosed the expanded Anthropic/Google TPU relationship + financial partners.
💰 JUNE: Broadcom, Apollo & Blackstone announced $35B financing for Anthropic AI infrastructure, alongside banks/institutional capital.
📄 SEPT 10-Q: AVGO disclosed the customer could issue up to $42B in convertible notes. As of Aug. 2: ZERO issued.” — The item presents Broadcom's disclosed financing arrangements and customer convertible-note disclosure as neutral facts without a directional company opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “that little breakout is holding better than expected” — The item describes only a technical price breakout and its persistence, which is a neutral price observation.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Ai isn't dying it's people who spresd fear..don't be a female cat keep buying” — The author advances a strongly bullish forward opinion that AI remains intact and that investors should keep buying.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “get thru this 232 wall once and for all” — The post describes a technical price level without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The 4 largest options bets on index names today:” — The item lists options bets on index names without providing a company-specific directional proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Looks like you're having trouble listening bro so let me help you out with sign language bro” — The item is a generic social post that mentions NVDA only as part of a broad market list without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Buy Back!” — The user's two-word thesis attributes a positive share-repurchase rationale to NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “$NVDA NVIDIA IN 2026 still represents 40% upside to the average analyst price target!” — The attributed analyst price-target thesis implies a strongly bullish forward outlook for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Cisco collaboration on networked quantum systems, combining Infleqtion computers and sensors with Cisco’s networking stack.” — The Cisco collaboration advances a commercial networked-quantum-system proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Integration of its qLDPC library with NVIDIA CUDA-Q Logical, which the company says can cut physical data-qubit overhead by up to about 5× versus common surface-code approaches.” — The library integration is presented as a material efficiency improvement for NVIDIA's quantum stack.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “We likely pop at open tomorrow but it’ll be a miracle if we close higher than 230.25 tomorrow.” — The item is a price-blind forecast of short-term share movement, which is a neutral observation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Breakout!” — The item reports only a price breakout without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Will #Micron Set Off An October #Volatility Spike?” — The item is a generic question about market volatility that does not state a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Pretty good action” — The item describes NVDA's share movement without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA
$236 back in May… additional $230 Billions in Buybacks announced since… Nvidia now $230.” — The item reports only a share-price observation and does not provide a scorable fundamental reason for the move.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$NVDA eoy $325” — The item states an explicit bullish forward price target for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Do your thing and dump” — The item is a price-blind request for a share-price move rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “hoping for an overreaction to jobs report tomorrow to get out of my puts and enter some longs here” — The item describes a trader's intended position change rather than a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “Michael Burry hands down is having the worst year of any investor out there, absolute failure in every pick.” — The attributed thesis is that Burry's investment performance has been an absolute failure.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Fundamentally technically every single way.” — The author presents an unequivocally bullish fundamental and technical thesis for Nvidia.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “only shortards will think this will open below $230 tomorrow” — The attributed short-seller view that the stock will open below a specific price is a bearish forward opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “a quarter trillion buyback this thing basically free value growth stock” — The author presents the buyback as creating substantial free value and a growth opportunity.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “closing below 230 is even more probable” — The item is a price-based probability observation with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I’m still watching $NVDA and $AMD like I always do” — The post states continued observation of NVIDIA without a directional investment opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 233 open tomorrow” — The item is only a price prediction with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this guy is absolutely spot on” — The post endorses an unspecified analyst view without stating the thesis or its direction for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “usually jensen starts selling shares around this time” — The item presents a recurring pattern of Jensen selling shares as a negative attributed observation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$POET really digging NTT Data's IOWN.. yet another dot pointing to $NVDA as well” — The post is a social observation that another investor is researching a different company and mentions NVDA only as an additional point.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Sir are we back or not ?” — The rhetorical question is a generic market check that does not state a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [news] “Prime Capital Financial’s Will McGough wants investors to look past NVDA’s market cap and focus on its earnings, valuation, and its role in the artificial intelligence buildout.”
— McGough's attributed thesis emphasizes NVDA's earnings, valuation, and AI buildout role as favorable long-term investment factors.Is Nvidia a good long-term buy? Why its massive size may not matter +0.70 [news] “Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA) added $150 billion to its share repurchase authorization, the largest increase of its kind in history.”
— The record-sized increase in buyback authorization is a strong positive capital-return commitment.Here’s Why Investors Keep Buying Nvidia (NVDA) +0.00 [social_text] “INVESTED BY $NVDA $AMZN $SFTBY” — The item reports investor holdings in Agility without stating a directional fundamental or attributed opinion about Agility.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “hit $225 today or big drop” — The item only poses a speculative question about NVDA's intraday price without a stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “$300 by Christmas” — The post sets an explicitly bullish forward price target for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “EXIT THE MARKET. NOW!” — The post's explicit call to exit the market expresses a strongly negative attributed investment opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “yea and they said that about $NVDA in 2021” — The user's rhetorical question implies that the cited bullish view on NVIDIA ultimately failed.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$QQQ $SPY $NVDA $AAPL” — The item is a bare mention of NVDA alongside other indices and stocks without any company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$ASML $NVDA $BTC.X” — The item is a bare multi-symbol mention without any substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Make sure you buy calls and take my hand bro” — The post explicitly urges buying call options on the named companies as a bullish investment thesis.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “It would be great to get some macroeconomic and geopolitical positives to catapult the markets to never before seen levels.” — The item expresses a general bullish wish for the broader market without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I wish this stock could be as big as AMD or META someday.” — The item is a price-aspiration observation with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Is this bullish” — The item poses a bullish question about the market without stating a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “John Denver me please. Right my 2026 wrongs.” — The post is a generic, non-directional request for help rather than a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPY $QQQ $AMZN $NVDA $SOXL hmmmm” — The post lists NVDA among several tickers without a substantive company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “one earning showing bad number” — The post characterizes a single earnings result as bad.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$NVDA stupid junk stuck” — The post expresses a strongly negative attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “This chart reflects all days post announcement…. 09/28-10/01” — The item reports post-announcement share-price movement without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 🤣🤣🤣 TA-DA!” — The post is a bare, celebratory mention of NVIDIA without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “AMD 600 and this is only 200” — The item is a price-blind observation of relative share levels without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA $232.5/$235 CALLS OVER $233” — The item only presents a speculative call option trade idea without a substantive fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Is it too late to get in or am i good?” — The post poses a timing question without stating a substantive directional opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA are my eyes tricking me” — The post expresses a personal perception about NVIDIA without stating a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “MU earnings proved AI play isn’t as dead as some think. No slowing down, buyback news” — The item presents positive evidence of earnings strength and active buybacks as a fundamental reason for Nvidia's AI exposure.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Apple (AAPL) And Nvidia (NVDA) Stock Buys” — The disclosure of stock purchases is a neutral company observation without a stated investment opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 💥💥💥” — The post is a bare, non-substantive mention of NVIDIA with no company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Typical all the gain wiped away before opening……” — The item reports only a historical price move without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Nvidia’s $150B Buyback” — A disclosed $150B buyback program is a positive capital-return and balance-sheet proposition for Nvidia.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “hold the support” — The post expresses a neutral technical observation about a support level without a directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “a technology so powerful it could wipe out humanity in very short order” — The attributed extreme risk is presented as a rhetorical counterpoint rather than a substantive company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPY $QQQ $INOD $NVDA” — The item is a bare list of tickers without a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA might actually go 3-4% today” — The item is only a price-move prediction with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Anthropic may go public on the week of the 9th of November.” — The item reports a potential IPO by a different company and contains no substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA had a market cap of 6B not 2T” — The item makes a neutral market-cap comparison without a substantive directional claim about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Bank of America says, the top 5 semicounductor picks are:
1) $NVDA (enhanced buybacks, multiple GTC tradeshow events)” — Bank of America explicitly ranks NVDA among its top semiconductor picks and cites positive operational factors.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “a real quantum computing firm with an A+ STAR TEAM that delivers, is coherent, does not reek of snake oil and marketing like $IONQ and actually paving their own future internally and organically with quantum systems developed in house” — The attributed comparison presents the company as a coherent, delivery-focused quantum firm and implicitly unfavorable to a named competitor.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 235 to end the week” — The item is a price target observation with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion to score.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the KOSPI ended the day up this morning” — The KOSPI is a foreign index; its movement is not a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Almost no dark pool resistance above these levels” — The absence of identified resistance above current levels is a bullish technical proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “you know it won’t hold!” — The item is a price-blind prediction of share movement without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Burry stubbornly chooses to place his bets against a 5 trillion dollar company” — The attributed bearish thesis is presented as an irrational, misguided position against Nvidia.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “reinstated as a Top Pick at Morgan Stanley” — Morgan Stanley's Top Pick rating is a strongly positive attributed analyst opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “All aboard!!!” — The item is a generic bullish call that provides no company-specific fundamental or attributed-opinion proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Only 33 business days until the next blowout E/R for this one.” — The item is a forward-looking observation about an upcoming earnings event without a stated positive or negative fundamental proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “We have a gusher…” — The hyperbolic bullish claim is a forward social opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “kicking ass and taking names today” — The item is a price-blind observation of Jensen Huang's performance rather than a scorable fundamental proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA is on Viagra...” — The item is a bare price-movement observation with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Institutional selling will make it plunge.” — The post presents a bearish attributed thesis that institutional selling will drive a sharp decline.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$MU BUY program again…. look at $NVDA … buy both” — The post explicitly recommends buying both Micron and NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “they gonna drop this so hard at open if this stay up” — The item is a speculative prediction about NVIDIA's share-price movement, which is not scorable sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The king is awake now” — The item is a price-blind observation of Nvidia's market status without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Nvidia's saluting you.” — The item is a neutral, non-fundamental observation about Nvidia without a scorable proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA has to be news” — The item asserts that NVIDIA is newsworthy but provides no substantive company-specific sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA no fucking way” — The item is a bare, non-substantive reaction to NVIDIA with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Nvidia is up in the mornings.” — The item reports only a share-price movement without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA New ATH today” — The item reports only a share-price milestone without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$228 open” — The opening price is a reported market observation with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Finally we’re running.” — The item reports only a price movement without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Buy Jensen Buy !!!” — The repeated buy call expresses strong bullish sentiment toward NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this one so needs to catch up with everything else that has soared in this space” — The item expresses a neutral relative-performance observation without a stated fundamental reason or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Breakout here is inevitable.” — The post presents an attributed bullish technical thesis that a breakout is inevitable.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPY $QQQ big profits at open #pivotgroup” — The item reports a broad-market price move without a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “the king of tech is being set free” — The item presents an explicitly bullish, attributed market opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA crash at open” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable underlying reason.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “nvidia named top stock to buy out of chip stocks this morning” — The item reports a bullish analyst recommendation specifically for Nvidia.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$AVGO 365 today. 380+ next week. 415+ end of year.” — The author's explicit price forecast for Broadcom is a strongly bullish attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this doesn’t move at all” — The item reports only that NVIDIA's share price did not move, which is a neutral observation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “It just keeps going up!!!” — The item reports only a continuing share-price move, which is explicitly price-blind and directionally neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “please go higher and sty up until open” — The post is a price-blind wish for upward movement rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA up in pre” — The item reports only a premarket price movement, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Long Time since we had a Gap and Go!” — The item describes a historical share-price pattern without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “BOUGHT THE DIP! THANKS FOR THE CHEAP TOKENS!” — The post describes buying shares at a lower price but reports no directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “the major breakout to 500 dollars then next year summer when numbers match 1000 dollars” — The post presents an explicit bullish price-target thesis for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “you know it won’t hold” — The item is a price-blind observation of share movement without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Morgan Stanley’s Top Pick – All AI Trends Play To Nvidia’s ‘Strengths,’ Says Analyst” — The item reports a bullish analyst thesis that AI trends favor Nvidia's strengths.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “almost parking here for one year finally breaking out” — The item describes only a reported share-price pattern without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “if this hit $140 today” — The item is a hypothetical price observation with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “How are you short this pig people doing?” — The post advances a negative attributed thesis about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “MORGAN STANLEY RENAMES NVIDIA TO TOP PICK” — Morgan Stanley's Top Pick designation is a strongly positive attributed analyst opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “nvda is a good canary - when that starts moving up again - warch out!” — The item treats NVIDIA's share movement as a market signal rather than a company-specific fundamental.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Morgan Stanley reinstated Nvidia as its top semiconductor pick on Friday, saying the chipmaker remains well positioned and trades at a relatively accessible valuation.” — Morgan Stanley's top-pick reinstatement and favorable positioning and valuation assessment form a strongly bullish attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “I’m really worried right now. I’m hoping it’s not a trap” — The user expresses personal worry and a fear that the repeated all-time highs may be a trap.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “$NVDA shorting here” — The post expresses a bearish shorting thesis about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA breakout ! 🚀” — The item reports only a price breakout without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Can we get triple ATH!” — The item is a price-blind wish for a triple all-time high, which is a reported price observation and not a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA top in?” — The question is a price-blind observation of a potential top and carries no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$241/241 close today!!” — The item reports only a closing price level without a substantive fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “volume precedes price and we sure have the volume today, all downside gaps have been filled new target price on this security is --- $242------ $252” — The author presents bullish technical evidence and an explicit bullish target as a forward opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “time for $GME level up next $NVDA” — The author explicitly forecasts a bullish move for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA should touch at least $240 today..” — The post expresses a bullish forward price expectation for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “looks good for more intra day upside” — The item is a price-based observation rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this stock is holding gains” — The item reports a price observation without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Looking to breakout.” — The item is a price-focused technical observation with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 6T next week” — The item is a bare price-target prediction without a stated fundamental reason or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “$SPCX Should surpass $NVDA soon!” — The post expresses a forward-looking view that a competitor will outperform NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Bears fkd .” — The post expresses a strongly bullish social-market opinion that bears are defeated.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA sold 🔥🫡” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$MNKD down she goes” — The item reports Nvidia's share-price movement without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA $VGT $VOO 💰💰💰💰😢 GLTA” — The post is a generic bullish sentiment expression that does not state a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA below 235 for blow off the top confirmation” — The item reports a technical price level and its confirmation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “There has been rejection 3 times on the weekly chart at current prices.” — The item reports a technical price pattern without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “$NVDA going to $250” — The post expresses a strongly bullish forward price opinion for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “create Tesla into a 8 Trillion dollar company” — The author expresses a bullish view that Tesla could reach an $8T valuation and potentially run on earnings and future guidance.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “she will stay elevated to screw all bears” — The post expresses a strongly bullish social opinion that Nvidia will remain elevated and defeat bearish resistance.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$CRWV $NVDA” — The item contains no substantive proposition about NVIDIA; it is only a bare ticker mention.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Analyst says $2,000 with massive buyback coming.” — The attributed analyst thesis is strongly bullish on Micron's valuation and buyback.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “up to 238” — The item reports only a price level without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “we breaking highs all over” — The item reports only a price high without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “this wants 240+” — The user's bullish expectation of a price target is a forward-looking opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA .https://x.com/coinbureau/status/2105696744889545172?s=46&t=Xq7UFW3u8B-l5R2nfYmJ2w” — The item is only a bare NVDA mention attached to a Bitcoin discussion and contains no substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA so 227 today or nah” — The item is only a price observation with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA never fking leads or holds” — The item is a price-blind observation of NVDA's historical leadership and holding behavior.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “AI trend will stay this strong for the remainder of the year” — The attributed view that the AI trend will remain strong is a positive forward opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$NVDA lol hedgies never fail - mo fuckers” — The post expresses a strongly negative attributed opinion about hedge-fund investors in NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA Nasdaq has been dropping for about 90 minutes! Now up 256” — The item reports only share-price movements, which are explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “I would never touch the stock long here” — The author's explicit long-term bearish conviction is a negative attributed opinion on NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA easy everytime short” — The post presents a repeated bearish thesis that NVIDIA is consistently easy to short.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “It literally gave up half of its gains” — The item describes a reported share-price move without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Beast mode” — The phrase is a bare, positive observation of share-price momentum and carries no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “actually thought they would let this turd stock break out” — The author's rhetorical question implies a bullish expectation that NVDA will break out.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “call wall at 235 completely prevents that” — The item describes a technical barrier to a specific price level without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this will be 240$ by the end of the day” — The item is a price prediction and does not provide a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Most obvious short in some time.” — The item is a neutral observation about short interest without a stated directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “will give up everything easiest stock to short” — The post asserts that NVIDIA is exceptionally easy to short, presenting a strongly bearish attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Could be on of those Fridays in deep deep red” — The item is a speculative observation about NVIDIA's share price movement, which is not scorable sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 238 plz” — The item is a price target, but the target itself is a neutral company observation without a stated directional opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA it’s over” — The item is a conclusory bullish sentiment statement about NVIDIA, but it provides no underlying fundamental or attributed opinion to score.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$NVDA BUY!” — The item is an explicit bullish recommendation about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA heading North boys & girls.” — The item is only a bullish price observation with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Hold the gains for the day please” — The item is a price-blind request to preserve intraday gains rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Burry and his soy boys getting REKT today” — The item is a generic, non-company-specific market commentary that does not bear on NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “silly range to chop before the afternoon session” — The item describes only a neutral intraday price range without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA looking unstable up here she wants to go back down” — The item is only a price-level observation with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the Christmas rally starts in October” — The item is a price-based seasonal observation with no stated fundamental reason for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Internet gurus overnight ⬇️” — The item reports a general overnight decline without stating a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “anyone checked on him?” — The post is a neutral check on investor attention to NVIDIA without a substantive directional proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the ai stocks like $NVDA not even dragging the rest of the 💩 up with them anymore” — The item describes NVDA's relative price performance without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “lets see ath close” — The item is a price-blind observation of a potential all-time high close, which carries no directional sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA
bout time!” — The brief post expresses investor attention but provides no substantive company-specific sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA $239 today lets goo baby!!” — The item is only a celebratory observation of NVIDIA's reported share price and carries no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “there’s very little hesitation in this advance.” — The item describes only the advance's character, which is a price movement observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I thought this was a $30 stock?” — The item is a price-memory observation with no substantive fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “the long term is beautiful” — The author's explicit endorsement of long-term ownership is a positive attributed investment opinion.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “A humanoid that can safely handle that kind of repetitive lifting could be genuinely useful.” — The author sees practical demand for Tesla's Optimus, which is a positive attributed view of Tesla's potential robot business.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA -:https://x.com/world_at_war_6/status/2105870393911529481?s=46&t=Xq7UFW3u8B-l5R2nfYmJ2w” — The item is only a bare social mention of NVIDIA with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$STX bouncing back… looking good.” — The item reports a positive share-price move without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$NVDA ✨To the Stars✨” — The celebratory phrase expresses a strongly bullish social opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA” — The item contains only a bare NVDA mention with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “SpaceX is positioned for a powerful rebound driven by a successful Starship launch, surging growth in Starlink, and soaring AI compute demand.” — The bullish proposition is explicitly about SpaceX, not NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “easy red soon” — The item is a price prediction without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$QQQ $SPY $MSFT $NVDA” — The item lists several broad market and company tickers without providing a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Next Support 232.” — This is a technical support level, not a fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “235.05 bills lost momentum today” — The item reports share-price momentum without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA melt all the degen call buyers of 235 0Dte strike lmao” — The item describes a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA back down she goes. Can’t even sustain 235.” — The item reports only a share-price decline without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “HUGE REVERSAL COMING??? - HUGE REVERSAL COMING IN THE MAG 7” — The item is a speculative prediction about a broad market reversal rather than a scorable proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Never going back to $230” — This is a price-level observation with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$3-$4 drop” — The item only reports a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “I have never ever seen such an undervalued stock in my live” — The author's explicit valuation judgment is strongly positive for JKS.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “going under $230 today” — The item is a price-level speculation about NVIDIA and contains no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 230 closing” — The item reports only a closing price level for NVIDIA, which is a neutral observation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA barcoding would be surprised if we break 235.2” — The item is a price-level prediction without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I hope we can stay above 232 at least..” — This is a price-level observation without a stated fundamental reason or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “I have 1000 shares that I am not letting go of!!!” — The author's stated refusal to sell is a strong positive attributed opinion on their own holding.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “buyin a quality stock and holding it long make money” — The post presents a general attributed thesis that holding quality stocks long-term is profitable.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “patience and persistence pay off.” — The attributed investor thesis is a positive forward-looking opinion on the value of persistence.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “that was a very convincing response.” — The item expresses a positive reaction to an unspecified response, but provides no company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion to score.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$PLTR Armada and $SPY $NVDA” — The item lists multiple securities without providing any substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “#Nvidia Gets Its Leather Jacket Back $NVDA” — The headline is a neutral observation of investor attention and carries no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about Nvidia.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “Probably same people who are afraid to buy $NVDA right now” — The post attributes fear to a group of investors, presenting a moderately bullish attributed opinion on NVDA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA ding. ding. ding ding !!!” — The item is a bare, repeated mention of NVIDIA with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Aren't we all half baked by now?” — The rhetorical question is a generic, non-directional observation about investor sentiment rather than a scorable proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$AMFN Alright Mr. Nelson. Great interview...take your pants off and show us the goods.” — The item is a generic, non-company-specific social post that only incidentally mentions NVDA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “@Mipel how’s his $NVDA short going?” — The post is a rhetorical question about short interest without stating a directional view on NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “@doledav - You jealous that you didnt get in early.” — The post is a price-blind, attributed opinion about an individual's timing rather than a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$CCXI $AMZN $NVDA $SONY all invested in agility” — The post lists NVDA among several companies in a generic agility observation without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The best of the best are doing well
$AMZN $MSFT $GOOGL $META $NVDA” — The post lists Nvidia among a group of large-cap tech names without providing a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA beauty” — The item is a brief, non-substantive expression of positive sentiment toward NVIDIA without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “This thing has a 5.7 trillion market cap🤣🤣🤣🤣” — The author's mocking remark treats NVIDIA's market capitalization as implausibly large.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$QQQ $SPY $TQQQ $NVDA 👇 before and after!” — The post is a generic market observation that includes NVDA as one of several tickers without a company-specific directional proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “#Stocks Finish Comfortably Higher As #Bonds Pull Back” — The item reports a broad market move without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Thank goodness I sold that garbage after hours and went short. Finally I made a good decision.” — The author's positive sentiment is explicitly about their own trading decision, not about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “are you guys playing the market and the earnings reports during november? or is it too risky?” — The post poses a general risk question about trading through earnings without stating a specific opinion on NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA” — The item is a bare mention of NVIDIA with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA poor bears and burry’s fans.” — The post explicitly characterizes bearish sentiment around NVIDIA as poor.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “If inflation is so high (as MSM screaming everyday), why Gold is down 25% since January? Shouldn't gold be up as "inflation hedge?” — The item questions gold's inflation-hedge behavior but does not present a scorable proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SMCI $SPY $NVDA” — The item is a bare mention of NVDA alongside other tickers without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “a company that generates more cash but a quarter of the price at $1.2T” — The author's comparison implies Microchip is undervalued relative to NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Tomorrow rag-men can be kings” — The post expresses an optimistic forward opinion about NVIDIA's prospects.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The Bullish Setup For The Market $NVDA $MU $GOOGL $NKE” — The bullish characterization is a general market setup rather than a specific fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Wall Street sees up to 99% upside potential for Nvidia” — The attributed bullish outlook is supported by multiple high-price analyst estimates.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Solid return of 38% over the last month.” — The item reports a historical return without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The technical setup presents a stand-off: price action for Micron is struggling below the” — The item describes Micron's technical setup as a stand-off without a directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the future is right around the corner.” — The item is a generic bullish market observation that does not state a specific proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA” — The post is a bare mention of NVIDIA without a substantive proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$225 Monday opening” — The item reports only a share-price observation with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 6T coming?” — The item is a speculative question about a potential share-price move and contains no substantive fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “ATH's next week again, lol.” — The item reports a share-price milestone without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “We had a very good week here.” — The item reports only a favorable share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA closed at its lowest point of the day.” — The closing price observation is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Past six months is good no?” — The item is a price-blind observation of NVDA's recent performance without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “If $NVDA hits $10T in the near future” — The item is a conditional price target without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA 250 end of the month” — The post states a specific forward price target for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “f you’re bullish on $NVDA right now, I can guarantee your chart has some serious problems.” — The author asserts that bullishness on NVIDIA is incompatible with the stated technical conditions.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$AVGO 375-380 Monday. Time to attack the 200 ema” — The attributed price target and technical setup are a neutral technical observation rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed fundamental opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “That has been a false flag organized to buy at cheap levels.” — The attributed thesis characterizes the activity as a deceptive manipulation intended to trap buyers.
stocktwits
-0.75 [social_text] “Nvidia's $500B chip financing deal, where NVDA eats $125B of residual risk itself? That's not a partnership. That's Lucent and Nortel's 2000 playbook with better branding.” — The attributed comparison to a failed financing model frames Nvidia's deal as excessively risky.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “preservation beats heroics; there is always another day to trade.” — The attributed trading philosophy is general and not specific to NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “even hypurscam is rigged over the weekend” — The user's claim that the market is rigged expresses a bullish attributed opinion about market conditions.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA elliot wave🤡” — The item references a technical analysis framework for NVIDIA but provides no substantive directional proposition.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “failed breakout and ATH rejection” — The post presents a failed breakout and all-time-high rejection as a bearish technical pattern.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Catch tops & bottoms for like, a living 🏄🏽♂️🧑🚀” — The post is a generic trading catchphrase that does not present a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Super bullish for stock market and AI” — The bullish view is a general market and sector opinion without a specific fundamental proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The White House is working on the weekends to pump the markets.” — The attributed White House activity is a general market-moving claim without a specific fundamental proposition for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Sleepy Donnie just now sent a huge warning to Iran.” — The geopolitical warning is not a company-specific proposition and therefore carries no directional sentiment for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 🤡” — The post is a bare, non-substantive mention of NVIDIA with no company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “We Know Some Will Call This Circular Financing” — The attributed thesis characterizes NVIDIA's financing as circular and compares it to Enron/Cisco/Nortel.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “watching the rally tonight” — The item describes a market rally without stating a directional fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$GOOGL $META $MU $NVDA fighting FUD and fuckrry!” — The post is a generic, non-specific defense against negative sentiment without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$BTC.X buckling higher… markets will follow Monday, huge move upwards.” — The item is a general bullish market forecast that does not state a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$QQQ $NVDA $TSM super intelligence” — The post mentions NVIDIA only as part of a generic thematic group without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Yearly Market Returns were ultimately higher on average during all years when yields above 5%” — The item presents a general historical observation about yields and returns without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Moron bear very angry delivering pizzas” — The post's hostile, bear-bashing tone is strongly bullish sentiment toward NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “indexes stall so you move to sector funds…they stall then you move to equities…they dump then you make the move to crypto which you know nothing about and that obliterates your trading account” — The item presents a general market-cycle trading pattern without a specific company proposition.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “black swan on deck” — The post warns of a potential extreme market event that could affect NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “IPO is Failing in Oct 2026.” — The post asserts that Nvidia's anticipated October 2026 IPO is failing, a negative attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “placing a bear put spread on Robinhood” — The item describes a bearish options setup but does not state a specific opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “placing a bull call spread on Robinhood” — The item describes a generic options trade without any company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Most traders buy calls or puts outright, which means the stock has to move big and fast before time decay and IV crush eat the premium.” — The item describes a general options-trading approach without stating a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “MAG 7 & SPY& QQQ & Tech Stocks Trend & Technical” — The item is a general technical-analysis roundup that does not state a directional opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$NVDA: $233.95 BUY” — The item states an explicit bullish attributed opinion on NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “$300 by the end of the year & $400+ in 2027.” — The post states an explicitly bullish forward price target for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Let's go SI investors.” — The post is a generic bullish cheer that does not state a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Get ready for all four of these Super Intelligence monsters to fly.” — The post presents a bullish forward thesis about four companies, including NVIDIA, as leaders in superintelligence.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Great qtr coming up.” — The user's statement is a positive attributed opinion about Apple's upcoming quarterly results.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The oil apocalypse is here.” — The item's oil-apocalypse claim is a market-wide proposition without a specific company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Infleqtion which is undervalued as fuck with an unbelievable world-class team.” — The author presents a strong bullish valuation and team thesis for Infleqtion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Massive rug pull coming” — The post asserts a severe near-term downside event for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 210 or 250, what comes first?” — The post poses a speculative price-target question without stating a directional analyst opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “BULLISH FOR STOCK MARKET” — The bullish sentiment is explicitly about the stock market generally, not about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “He bought September 2027 puts at strikes in the mid $100S.” — The attributed put purchase is a bearish forward opinion on Nvidia's price.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “if you thought September was fun, wait till you see October” — The item is a generic bullish market observation that does not state a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I'd rather be agitated and solvent than agitated and reckless.” — The attributed sentiment is a general investment principle, not a directional opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Technical chart show macro wedge on verge of mega-breakout” — The author presents a bullish technical thesis about an impending breakout.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “The Short Situation with 25% short float locked in 2-day bottleneck” — The author offers a bullish thesis that substantial short float could constrain downside.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “CNBC $POET mention aggressively driving upward momentum” — The author attributes bullish momentum to CNBC coverage of the company.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Conversation picked up across some of the most popular tickers on Stocktwits this week” — The item reports increased social conversation about NVDA but provides no substantive directional company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Compounding can be powerful” — The item makes only a general observation about compounding without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA loser Trump Taco?!?! Pallets of gold to open up straight pleaseeee I need to win midterms” — The item is a nonsensical social post that does not present a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$FET.X let's do it 😁
$BTC.X $ETH.X $NVDA” — The post is a generic bullish call that mentions NVDA only as part of a list of unrelated tickers.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Excited for the next week!” — The post expresses a strongly positive forward-looking sentiment about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Friggin 🤡 show $SPY $NVDA $GOOG” — The item is a generic, non-substantive expression of frustration that does not state a scorable proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “IBRX is the $NVDA of Biotech” — The comparison to NVIDIA is an attributed bullish opinion on IntellibridgeRx's market position.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 222.5C 900% $460 gains $NVDA 225C 380% $300 gains” — The item reports only NVDA option gains without a stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The key question is whether buyers support the trend when volume returns.” — The item is a neutral observation about market conditions rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Stay disciplined, follow the process, and the money comes.” — The attributed advice is general trading discipline and does not state a company-specific fundamental or opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$IBRX is soon becoming the $NVDA of Biotech” — The comparison is an attributed bullish thesis about Ibragene's future market position.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA $SPY $TSLA” — The item mentions NVIDIA only as part of a generic multi-stock call to action without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Futures looking decent.” — The item offers only a neutral market outlook without a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$MU Which
RePeat it's going to be
$NVDA $INTC $TSM” — The post is a neutral, repeated mention of NVIDIA without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “Bears rn” — The post expresses a bearish view, but the only company-specific proposition is an incidental mention of NVDA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA $TSLA $MXL $IOVA $RIVN” — The mention of NVDA is incidental to general advice about handling negative macro headlines.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “board curious if anyone here is also tracking $RYET?” — The post is a neutral observation about investor attention to another company rather than a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA suffocate me” — The item is a target-specific expression of investor attention but contains no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “This week day trading looking at $SOXL,$TQQQ,$NVDA,$TSLA,$PLTR” — The item lists NVDA among several names but offers no substantive proposition about that company.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “its healthy” — The item offers a positive attributed health assessment of NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$IBRX $NVDA Absolutely” — The item asserts a positive association between two companies but provides no substantive proposition about NVIDIA's fundamentals or prospects.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “We can bury Michael Burry and we can all make money together” — The post advances an explicit bullish thesis that coordinated buying can overcome a bearish counterposition.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Very bullish for next week.” — The user expresses a strongly bullish forward opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA $SI only up from here!” — The post expresses a bullish forward opinion that NVIDIA's stock will only move higher.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Economic calendar on holiday this week” — The item's only company-specific content is a neutral observation about the economic calendar.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “there must be an expansion to the NVDA PE. I think we’ll get it this month” — The author explicitly forecasts expansion of NVIDIA's valuation multiple as a bullish development.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “i don't trust the bulls” — The user expresses a negative attributed opinion toward bullish sentiment for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$QQQ $SPY $NVDA $BTC.X” — The item lists multiple symbols without providing a substantive bullish or bearish proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Significant concerns have been raised that Houthi control over the Bab al-Mandab Strait would further disrupt the flow of oil from the Middle East—a flow already hampered by Iran’s effective closure of the nearby Strait of Hormuz.” — The item presents a significant geopolitical risk to Middle Eastern oil flow, which is a material supply risk for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$BE 🔴
$BTC.X 🔴
$TSLA 🔴
$NVDA 🔴 ” — The red-ticker list is generic market commentary without a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Optimistic for the week bulls!” — The post expresses bullish optimism about NVIDIA's near-term outlook.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “It is nice to start the week with a voice of reason on Bloomberg news this morning.” — The item is a neutral observation about Bloomberg's tone rather than a scorable proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “His a kind media full on bull” — The user explicitly characterizes the media as strongly bullish toward NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Very bullish here.” — The user's explicit bullish statement is a strong attributed forward opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “ain’t nothing good happening for bulls up here” — The post expresses a strongly bearish view of bullish sentiment for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$MU AI DOOM LOOP → ECONOMIC HAVOC” — The item is a generic market-wide economic headline that does not state a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Cantor Fitzgerald Affirms Overweight on NVIDIA, $350 PT” — Cantor Fitzgerald's affirmed Overweight rating and disclosed price target constitute a bullish attributed analyst opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “they are actually undervalued here” — The user's valuation thesis is a positive attributed opinion on NVIDIA's valuation.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “This is insanely bullish, exciting!” — The post expresses an explicitly bullish attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “$CBRS this valuation makes $NVDA look like an absolute fire sale price” — The attributed valuation comparison frames NVIDIA's price as exceptionally attractive.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “$NVDA dump this bitch now” — The post is an explicit, strongly bearish social call to sell NVIDIA shares.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “another one with trump's syndrome” — The post attributes a negative political characterization to NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Done buying puts $AAPL $NVDA” — The user's explicit purchase of puts expresses a bearish opinion on NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “AVGO bullish as hell! Lets go bulls📈” — The post expresses a strongly bullish opinion about Broadcom.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Extraordinary company with growth at a very reasonable price.” — The attributed assessment combines an extraordinary company view with growth at a reasonable valuation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$MU Netlist and Micron Enter Patent License and Settlement Agreements” — The item reports a patent agreement between Micron and Netlist, not NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA all the shit talking is finally paying off” — The item is a neutral observation that prior negative social sentiment has resolved, without stating a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “Applied Digital Secures Up to 1 GW of Potential Power Capacity in Finland, Marking First International Development in the Nordics” — Applied Digital's first Nordic power-capacity development is a positive expansion milestone.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$MU 🥊 Netlist & Micron Settled: 💰 What Does the $600M Deal Mean for What Comes Next?” — The item discusses a Micron settlement and is not substantively about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$INTC @vegas2ny4 $NVDA 🤡” — The post mentions both Intel and NVIDIA but offers no substantive company-specific proposition for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA https://x.com/chaosouland/status/2107915604065964289” — The item is only a bare mention of NVDA with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$OKLO $SMR $SPY $QQQ $NVDA” — The item is a bare list of tickers with no company-specific proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$AMD $DJT $NVDA $QQQ $SPY We try to use words with less syllables so that Joe’s base can follow along.” — The item is a generic wordplay post that mentions NVDA only as part of a ticker list without any substantive proposition about the company.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$BTC.X $ASML $TAO.X $ICP.X $NVDA” — The item lists NVDA only as part of a generic market ticker string without any company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$TSLA $SPCX $NVDA $INDA” — The item is a bare list of tickers without any substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPY $MCD $NVDA AI is terrible for ads. They keep feeding me ads for McDonald’s. I’m a vegetarian! 🤣” — The post is a generic social complaint about AI ad targeting and does not present a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_engagement] “peak 0 mentions over 2 snapshots” — Peak social engagement of zero mentions is a neutral company observation with no directional sentiment.
stocktwits
technical breakdown risk (447) +0.08
-0.70 [social_text] “failing, no-margin, non-profit car company” — The attributed characterization asserts Tesla is failing and lacks profitability and margins.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “H1 revenue +99% YoY” — The reported half-year revenue growth is a strong positive operating result.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Major AI infrastructure deployments moving toward execution” — The stated progress toward executing a major AI infrastructure deployment is a positive operational proposition.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “We will eventually drive consumers to a breaking point at they may completely revolt against endless cycle of expensive upgrades that provide no material value to them.” — The attributed thesis predicts consumer revolt against expensive upgrades that deliver little material value.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “an estimated 2027 P/E (KGV) of only around 7” — The attributed valuation is presented as strikingly low relative to Micron's growth and AI exposure.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Micron just delivered exceptional growth and guided the next quarter even higher” — Exceptional growth and a higher forward guide are strong positive operating results.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “most of its 2027 HBM supply is already contracted. DRAM and NAND supply is also expected to remain tight, supporting pricing and profitability” — Contracted HBM supply and tight DRAM/NAND supply support profitability.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “$mu trading 14 pe. $NVDA 28 pe.” — The comparison suggests NVIDIA's valuation is higher than Micron's.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Micron's very strong earnings/guidance reinforced the AI trade.” — Strong earnings and guidance are a positive fundamental proposition for Micron.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “MU reported great earnings, which is was expected.” — The post characterizes Micron's earnings as great, a positive fundamental assessment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Nvidia-Backed Nebius Acquires Inferize To Reduce Idle GPU Costs Across AI Inference Workloads” — The acquisition is about Nebius's own inference costs, not a stated Nvidia business impact.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “elevated equity positioning and leverage have returned to the market, potentially acting as a headwind for stocks in the fourth quarter” — The strategist's thesis identifies elevated leverage and equity positioning as a potential headwind for stocks, including NVDA, heading into Q4.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “holding $216.3M in Current Assets alone and $236M in Total Assets against just $49M in total liabilities” — The item presents a strong balance-sheet position and substantial asset base relative to liabilities as a positive fundamental proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The solution for AI problem is more AI.” — The item offers a generic, unsubstantiated proposition about AI without providing company-specific evidence or a scorable attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “They provide energy to ai data centers and energy is the number 1 bottleneck to the ai data center infrastructure buildout.” — The item identifies energy as a critical bottleneck for AI data-center buildout, implying strong demand for the company's energy services.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “China suspends fuel exports until further notice.” — The export suspension is a general energy-market event with no stated impact on NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “ER was good, guidance is good” — The post explicitly characterizes Micron's earnings and guidance as positive.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Accenture's Q4 beat and record $84.5B in annual bookings” — Accenture's strong quarterly results and record bookings are a positive operating proposition.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Micron posted record Q4 revenue of $54.2B and raised FY27 guidance well above Street estimates” — Record revenue and a materially raised guidance beat are strongly positive operating results for Micron.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “49% of my portfolio is in 3 names.. $NVDA $AMD $SMH” — The user's concentration disclosure is a neutral observation about their holdings and does not bear a directional sentiment on NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Proteomics w AI analysis” — The item presents AI-driven proteomics as a promising application area.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Proteomics w AI analysis $QSI” — The item's only substantive proposition concerns a different company's AI proteomics opportunity, not NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$SES is acquiring and integrating real manufacturing lines, high-density cell tech, and global supply chains” — The acquisition and integration of manufacturing lines, technology, and supply chains is a positive expansion proposition for SES.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Alignment Engine secured $1.17B–$1.2B in AI orders.” — The disclosed multi-billion-dollar AI infrastructure order is a strong positive business proposition for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$APP poor $TTD has become some sort of a benchmark of financial mismanagement and misery” — The attributed sentiment characterizes Applied Materials' financial management as poor and miserable.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “High-density battery demands in this eVTOL space are absolute INSANITY!” — The item presents an attributed view that demand for high-density batteries is extremely strong.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Nvidia sits at the center of basically every AI policy headline this year without the government actually owning a piece of it.” — The item identifies Nvidia as central to AI policy coverage but offers no directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “When they are changing this to SI.GOV?” — The post is a bare mention of an AI government initiative without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “all they have to do is SELL $PLTR Foundry and AIP for AIR!!!” — The post presents a bearish thesis that NVIDIA should divest to complete an Airbus acquisition.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Straight from Kent Helfrich (CTO & President of GM Ventures): "It’s all about cost, range, and charging. And SES delivers on ALL of those promises!"” — GM's CTO explicitly affirms that SES meets the key performance criteria for its battery technology.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Q2 revenue +62% YoY to $9.3M” — Quarterly revenue more than doubled year over year.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Record quarterly bookings of $15.1M” — Record quarterly bookings indicate strong order growth.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Book-to-bill 1.6x in Q2” — A book-to-bill ratio above one shows orders exceeding recognized revenue.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “2026 revenue growth guidance raised to 25–30%” — Raised revenue growth guidance is a positive forward fundamental.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Trump said the US government might take ownership stake in Open Ai and other Ai companies” — The government-ownership speculation is not a stated fundamental proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “AI Infrastructure Expansion Mirroring 1960s Computer Leasing Bubble” — Burry's comparison frames Nvidia's expansion as a bubble-like risk.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Google tests its plan for AI data centers in space with Project Suncatcher” — The item reports a Google project without stating whether it is beneficial or harmful to NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA Nvda 509 eoy” — The item is a bare product reference without a substantive company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Hock is not going to let anyone take Broadcom under.” — The attributed view that Broadcom will not be acquired is a positive forward opinion on Broadcom's independence.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “Chinese technology companies increasingly look for ways to reduce their dependence on NVIDIA’s AI hardware and software ecosystem.” — The stated trend toward reducing dependence on NVIDIA's ecosystem is a negative attributed proposition for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPY $QQQ $MU $NVDA $SOXX” — The item lists NVDA as a component of several indices without providing a substantive company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “NVIDIA said it is investigating the matter with its manufacturing partners” — NVIDIA's investigation of a transaction involving restricted processors indicates active export-control enforcement.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “it’s go time for Anthopic for november come hell or high water” — The item is a general bullish thesis about Anthropic, not a company-specific proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Big cup-and-handle-like structure on the daily.” — The item describes a technical price pattern without a stated fundamental or attributed directional opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Infrastructure For AI Buildout Is ‘Crumbling’ — Sees 2006-Style Setup” — Burry's thesis that AI buildout infrastructure is deteriorating and resembles a prior crisis is a strongly negative attributed fundamental risk.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$MU micron is almost as undervalued as Nvidia… $NVDA” — The comparison is neutral because it does not state whether Nvidia's valuation is high or low.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “triple inside bar setup on daily time frame, expecting a big move out of this consolidation soon” — The item describes a price-based technical pattern and an expected move, which are neutral observations without a stated fundamental reason or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Open AI might buy NVIDIA” — The item presents an unconfirmed acquisition possibility without stated probability or outcome.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$NVDA agentic agent race is on. First to market rush occurring next few years.” — The item presents a bullish attributed thesis that NVIDIA is positioned to lead a competitive race in agentic AI.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “The AI mother flagship” — The item characterizes NVIDIA as the leading AI company, a positive attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Amazon Reportedly Seeks To Offload $8B Of Nvidia Chips To Investors” — The reported offloading arrangement is a neutral company observation without a stated positive or negative fundamental impact.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Nvidia and SoftBank finalized their participation in a massive $20 billion investment round for OpenAI.” — The finalized investment reinforces Nvidia's integration and dominance in the AI ecosystem.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “used Ai to make a water into wine machine” — The post makes a strong, though unverified, positive claim about an AI-enabled product.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Amazon seeks to offload $8BN of Nvidia chips to investors” — Amazon's attempt to sell Nvidia chips indicates weak demand for Nvidia's products.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “NVDA is still the largest holding, almost 4%.” — The item reports NVDA's size within the author's portfolio without a directional company judgment.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “Amazon is raising AI chip rental prices 15%” — The stated rental-price increase is a positive attributed demand signal for Nvidia's AI chips.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Hyperscalers oversupplied.” — The attributed thesis that hyperscalers are oversupplied with chips is a negative forward view on demand for Nvidia's products.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “this one keeps passing every test” — The post asserts that NVIDIA repeatedly passes tests, indicating strong product performance.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA but dips for short call scalps easy 20-40%” — The item describes a short-term trading approach rather than a substantive fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “warp speed to 280” — The item states a product-development target without providing a substantive positive or negative company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NKE stock ticker 👉 Eroc 🤘mentioned on cnbc , checkout the video below👇
$SOFI $MU $NVDA $TSLA
https://www.cnbc.com/video/2026/10/01/evercoreas-nick-amicucci-on-managing-the-growing-ai-power-demand.html” — The item is a bare mention of NVIDIA within a list of tickers and does not convey a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The Key Gamma Strike / Hedge Wall: Sits firmly at $350.00. This functions as the immediate underlying gravity anchor for the day.” — The item describes options-based price mechanics without a directional fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “$1,000,000,000/day NET PROFIT expected in FY28.” — The item presents an explicit, highly positive forward profit expectation for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA release approx 50%” — The item reports a neutral quarterly revenue observation without a directional fundamental conclusion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The longer I invest, the more I realize the goal isn’t to constantly be doing something. It’s to understand the whole board.” — The item offers general investment advice without a specific directional proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Taking profit here.” — Taking profits is a neutral position-management observation without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Revenue is up 106% YoY” — The reported 106% year-over-year revenue increase is a strong positive operating result.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “75% gross margin” — A 75% gross margin is a strong positive profitability indicator.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Big day for traders” — The item is a generic observation about trading activity and does not state a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Time to take some fresh eyes into what is happening in AI.” — The item offers a neutral observation about the AI industry without a specific company-directed proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “this one is making a pretty compelling case” — The post presents a positive attributed investment thesis about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Good day to make some quick money and still keeping the position intact!” — The post expresses a favorable trading sentiment but does not state a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “between $AVGO and $NVDA debt backstops. Have we ever seen vender financing at this scale?” — The item describes Broadcom's large debt-financing scale without stating a positive or negative fundamental consequence.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “people buying” — The post reports active buying of NVDA shares, a positive attributed investor action.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “so many stupid bulls” — The post disparages bullish sentiment around NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “when this breaks its timber” — The post suggests a product failure, which is a negative reliability proposition for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA easy under 230” — The attributed view that NVIDIA is easily below 230 is a bullish price-target opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “RSI is cooling off, gap is getting filled , then take off!” — The item is a price-based technical observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “$NVDA told you soon red” — The post expresses a bullish view that NVIDIA will soon turn red (rise).
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “complete bs action” — The phrase is a bullish social-market thesis that the action is deceptive and will reverse.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA fade baby fade” — The phrase describes a bearish price reaction but contains no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “waiting for the run to 235.50 before close” — The item is only a price-target observation with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “shorts are crying and its not over yet !” — The author presents an attributed bullish thesis that a short squeeze is underway and will continue.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “That's not a quick flip, that's smart money betting on years of growth ahead.” — The attributed investor thesis is explicitly bullish on NVIDIA's multiyear growth.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “trapped a lot of people at 736” — The item describes a reported share-price level and reaction, which is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 12 min and then to $237-238” — The item reports only a short-term share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “increased gridlock could reduce legislative uncertainty and create a tailwind for equities” — Fisher's thesis identifies reduced legislative uncertainty as a potential positive tailwind for equities.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA Nvidia Stock Price Prediction 2026, 2030, 2040” — The item is only a headline about future price predictions; no substantive fundamental or attributed opinion is provided.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA grinding out another all time high” — The item reports only a historical share-price high, which is explicitly price-blind and directionally neutral.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “It’s an incredible bowl flag cup and handle every fundamental stat you want and a quarter trillion buyback.” — The author presents a strongly bullish technical pattern and a comprehensive positive fundamental thesis.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “To the Stars” — The item expresses an explicitly bullish social opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the strength here is pretty obvious” — The item describes share-price strength without stating a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “This is the beginning of a serious breakout. Heavy volume.” — The author presents a strongly bullish technical thesis based on price and volume.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “It’s still up a great deal and it’s on its breakout in my opinion.” — The author presents a bullish technical opinion on NVIDIA's breakout and substantial gains.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “ATH’s” — The ATH observation is a price-level observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA -https://x.com/burrytracker/status/2106083251311783986?s=46&t=Xq7UFW3u8B-l5R2nfYmJ2w” — The item points to a Burry Tracker post that presents a bearish thesis about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA just go red” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “why did I buy at 736.5” — The post is a price-specific purchase reflection with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$MU False Breakout Lower Lows coming Mfrs” — The item is a general technical-market observation that does not state a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “they $NVDA hit an ATH” — The ATH is a reported price observation and carries no directional sentiment under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA ready for a small rinse?” — The item is a price-blind question about a potential small move, which is a neutral observation rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “🏃♂️🏃♀️🏃” — The running-emoji sequence is a price-blind observation of momentum without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “This stock will dip again and raise again.” — The item describes only NVDA's historical price pattern without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Then consider buying the shit out of the King after 3:55.” — The author explicitly recommends buying NVIDIA shares after the close.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$240” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA initiate healthy pullback narrative.” — The item is a price-based technical narrative without a stated fundamental reason or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “nice close holding 234 ..........great .......lets see where we open tommorrow if above great signs ........for upward grind 💪.” — The item is a bullish social observation of Nvidia's share price movement, which is explicitly neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA Monday open $225” — The reported opening price is a neutral observation and not a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “good job mms minimizing the damage” — The post describes a share-price outcome without stating a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Casually hitting new highs” — The item reports only a share-price high, which is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$NVDA 250 MONDAY SO BY NEXT FRIDAY 300” — The item states a bullish price target for NVIDIA within a short window.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “they about to deploy that buy back money” — The post indicates an anticipated deployment of buyback funds, a positive capital-return action.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$MU +$336, $NVDA +$77, $TSLA +$117. $530 on the day.” — The item reports only NVIDIA's share-price movement without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “took some profit at the $237 level today” — The item reports a historical share-price transaction without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “despite the upside” — The investor identifies upside potential, which is a bullish attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$CEG 250Ps STO from 4.00 expire worthless. $NVDA 235Cs STO from 3.00 expire worthless.” — The item reports a neutral options-expiration outcome without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “This stock is going not just to 240 or 250 but considerably higher based on the amount of money for the bets being made” — The author presents a strongly bullish forward opinion that NVDA will reach substantially higher prices, attributed to the size of option bets.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$225 next friday?” — The item is a price target question that does not establish a substantive bullish or bearish proposition.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “missed the call” — The post states NVIDIA missed an analyst expectation, which is a negative performance proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “we hit all time highs” — The item reports an all-time high, which is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “233.95” — The item reports only a share price level, which is a neutral observation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA final trade 233.95” — The item reports only a final trading price, which is a price observation and not a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA hit 238 and now can’t even hold 234” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA back below 230 next week” — The item reports only a price level observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “they’re gonna pin it below 234” — The item is a technical price observation rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “yeah baby c'mon up into close” — The item is a bullish social observation of share-price movement, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the trend appears to be strengthening with time.” — The item describes a strengthening price trend without stating a fundamental reason or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA SHAT KIND OF CHIPPSS ?!?” — The post is an unintelligible, non-substantive question about NVIDIA products and carries no company-specific sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “was able to sell at $3.X within the first 30 min” — The item reports a short-term option sale and the underlying's move, which is a price observation and not scorable sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$POET would explode to $40 if $NVDA is with them.” — The post is a conditional partnership speculation without stated facts or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 235C: +20%” — The item reports only a historical share-price move, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “The fincial engineering, leverage, off balancesheet , collateralized depreciating asset funding, PE structuring, finacing neo with profits.” — The attributed thesis alleges fundamentally destructive financial engineering and capital structure.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “What is the end of year target here?” — The post asks for a forward target without stating any directional opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.60 [news] “rivalsâ custom AI chips may compress margins and slow growth”
— The item presents a forward-looking competitive thesis that could materially compress Nvidia's margins and growth.Nvidia: Competition Caps The Upside Case +0.00 [social_text] “$AVGO 375+ Monday” — The item reports Broadcom's share price movement without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Nvidia hit a $5.7T record high” — The record high is a price observation and carries no directional sentiment under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Nvidia Hits A Record” — The item reports a record share price, which is a price observation and not scorable sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 235C +20%” — The item reports only a historical share-price move, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “this bankrupt company” — The post asserts Intel is bankrupt, a strongly negative attributed opinion about Intel's financial condition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “a $24 million Pentagon contract awarded to Foundation Future Industries—a robotics startup where he serves as chief strategy adviser—to test military humanoid robots.” — The contract is for a different company and does not bear on NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA disappointed AF” — The item is a price-blind observation of share performance with no scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Happy upward trending weekend!!!” — The item expresses a positive view of the share's upward movement, which is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Been a good week.” — The item reports a favorable share-price movement without stating a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Steady, methodical progression towards validation of Texatron fusion engine.” — The post describes steady progress toward validating Texatron's fusion engine as a positive development.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “China says they can make their own computer chips and their own computer memory...” — The claim that China can produce its own chips and memory is presented as a competitive challenge to Nvidia's market position.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “a 22 on the Quality Score, 2nd of 83 in Semiconductors” — The item reports a neutral company ranking without a directional quality judgment.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Soon, these agents will know more about you than even yourself, get hacked, use your personal information to change everything and fuck you off royally forever.” — The attributed thesis warns of severe privacy and security risks from AI agents.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “At some point we stared too use the general term Artificial Intelligence.” — The item discusses AI terminology generally and does not make a scorable proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Won’t take a position until it outperforms the sector” — The stated position rule is a neutral observation of sector-relative performance rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Nvidia generated 41% more revenue in a single quarter” — The attributed quarterly revenue increase is a strong positive operating result.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this company has been in the talks with your companies too” — The item reports a neutral investment-interest observation about American Fusion without a scorable proposition for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Keep going. We are making progress. We know our stocks are worth much more.” — The post expresses a positive forward opinion about the companies' progress and valuation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA looking 2 Monday morning to B with the winners of the NVDA type” — The item is a generic, non-specific observation about investor attention to NVIDIA without a substantive directional proposition.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “I just wanted more and Nvidia supplied the more for me as well as the world.” — The author presents a strongly bullish attributed view on Nvidia's supply and growth.
stocktwits
+0.60 [news] “NVIDIA fits the Decent Value screen with strong growth, profitability, health, and a reasonable forward valuation.”
— The attributed screen assessment combines strong growth and profitability with reasonable valuation as a positive fundamental proposition.NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) Screens as a Decent Value Stock +0.00 [social_text] “$INTC did ya all know this???
$NVDA $MU $AMD” — The post is a bare mention of NVIDIA without any substantive proposition about the company.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Insta block” — The item is a generic trading callout that does not state a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “what a ride from $7600.” — The item describes a broad market move without a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA $TSLA $ASTS $SLS $ACN” — The item lists NVDA among several tickers without providing a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA $SPCX $TSLA 🧘🧘🧘🧘” — The post mentions NVDA only as part of a generic ticker list without any company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA” — The mention is incidental and carries no substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “GREEN WEEK STILL” — The item is a bullish market observation about NVIDIA's share price but contains no scorable company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “AI is stupid and slop but it’s gonna kill us.” — The post expresses a strongly negative attributed opinion about the AI industry.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “FORM 4 of C Suite BUYING COMMONS” — The user explicitly calls for evidence of C-suite common-stock purchases, which would be a positive insider-buying signal.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA $SPY I guess that’s Hwang’s strategy..!!” — The post is a speculative observation about an investor's strategy rather than a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “The intensive training cycle for AI required GPUs and memory.” — The statement identifies strong historical demand for NVIDIA's GPUs and memory in AI training.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “shareholders out here still that are suprised by the manipulation and weakness of this stock” — The attributed shareholder view characterizes the stock as manipulated and weak.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The top performing options lottos of the week from Sept 28 - Oct 2.” — The item ranks options lottos but does not state a directional fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA up in the 24 hrs market” — The item reports only a share-price move without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Primary aggregate GEX level for Monday is clustering in the 769.3-770.1 range for $SPY” — The options positioning observation is about the S&P 500, not NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$242 next week?” — The item is a price target question without a stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “The share buy back is NVDA saying enough of this crap, the market wont reward us then we will take our shares back and move our stock ourselves.” — The author presents the buyback as a confident, positive strategy to support the stock when the market underperforms.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$TSLA $SPCX $TSM $NVDA $SPY” — The item lists multiple companies and indices without providing any substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Large Caps like the Mag7 have actually been underperforming the broader market” — The item reports a relative performance observation without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “165.00 to 234.22 Weekly and Monthly charts still trending up.” — The item reports only a historical price trend without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Watching closely into next week” — The post expresses neutral attention to NVIDIA without a substantive directional proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Every USA 🇺🇸 CITIZEN should own 1,000 shares plus of PLTR!!!” — The item is a broad, unsubstantiated call to own Palantir, not a scorable company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “this market is going to bust a nut” — The author forecasts a severe market decline, which is a negative attributed opinion on market volatility.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Exciting..$NVDA , $MU , $PLTR , $MU and of course $SPCX.” — The post is a generic bullish remark that mentions NVDA without a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Putins just saying…” — The item is a generic, non-company-specific reference to a market-wide AI article.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “$NVDA’s long-term story still depends on customers turning AI spending into measurable productivity.” — The author identifies customer productivity realization as a positive demand condition for NVIDIA's long-term story.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “whether price can hold gains after the initial reaction” — The item is a price-blind observation of potential share-price behavior rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Watching whether buyers defend the recent range.” — The item reports a price-range observation without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA NEW ALL TIME HIGHS COMING BABY !!” — The item reports only a price-level observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$240 Monday” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.50 [social_text] “$SPCX chips will compete with $NVDA chips one day or at least some market share.” — The attributed view anticipates future competition and potential market-share loss for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “This is a completely different company now vs 2007.” — The comparison is a neutral company observation without a stated directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$250 Monday.” — The item is a price target observation with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion to score.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “A Brittle House Of Cards” — The item's title advances a bearish thesis about major technology companies, including NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “the AI boom shows little sign of slowing” — The item states the AI boom is continuing with little sign of slowing, a positive attributed market assessment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Next week is gonna be insanely crazy bro
I seriously can't even imagine how high it's gonna go bro OMG” — The item is a speculative prediction about NVIDIA's share price movement, which is not scorable sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA is rhyming with June 2007” — The item presents a historical price-pattern comparison without a forward-looking fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “There are many places in the sector that far outperformed NVDA.” — The item reports relative underperformance without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Taking back a total of 4% of the market cap over the next 16 months is not sufficient to move the share price in a meaningful way.” — The item reports share-price movement as a neutral observation without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$230 Monday” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA price action looks constructive” — The item's only substantive proposition is a price-action observation, which is explicitly price-blind.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA has held up well after the recent AI infrastructure enthusiasm.” — The item describes a reported share-price observation without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “when $NVDA, $AVGO are selling at 20% valuation of this crap” — The author's comparison implies NVIDIA is materially undervalued relative to AMD.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “oct is usually great month for stock” — This is a general monthly price observation without a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “the Ascend series AI chips have captured 50% of the Chinese market, surpassing NVIDIA's 8%.” — Huawei's stated Ascend share and NVIDIA's stated share in China are directly competitive and unfavorable to NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA looks more constructive when strength holds after the first reaction.” — The item describes share-price strength and follow-through without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The 3 trillion “AI Infrastructure Capex Debt Boom” bubble mania which is single handily keeping GDP positive in the USA Isn't at the Dangerous Part Yet” — The item presents a broad macro thesis about AI infrastructure and GDP without a specific directional claim about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “NVDA announced the largest stock buyback in the history of the earth” — The stated buyback program is a large, positive capital-return action for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NBIS $CRWV $SPY $NVDA $AMZN” — The item lists multiple AI stocks without providing a substantive comparison or directional judgment about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [news] “traded at an all-time high yesterday”
— The item reports Nvidia's share-price milestone without a scorable fundamental reason.Nvidia Gets Its Leather Jacket Back +0.80 [social_text] “The Bitcoin bull run about to start…” — The author predicts a bullish run for Bitcoin.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “On its way to $500 easy” — The item is a bullish prediction about NVIDIA's share price, which is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA Nvidia Stock Price Prediction 2026, 2030, 2040” — The item is only a title referencing a price prediction; no substantive company proposition is provided.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “I think it is safe to day NVIDIA will be part of that equation.” — The author speculates that NVIDIA will participate in Volkswagen's autonomous driving partnership, a moderately bullish attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Watching the order flow around product launches can be more informative than a single headline” — The item describes a product-launch observation without stating a directional fundamental proposition for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA $240 Monday” — The post sets an explicit bullish price target for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 24-hrs weekend market looking good” — The item is a price-blind observation of short-term market performance with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$QQQ $SPY $NVDA $AAPL MSFT AMZN TSLA META GOOGL” — The item lists NVDA as a component of the QQQ and SPY indices without providing any substantive company-specific sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA undervalued” — The post asserts a bullish valuation opinion on NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Wonder if we can break 250 next.” — The item is a price-level speculation about NVIDIA and contains no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “the AI and semiconductor story still has strong long-term support” — The author expresses a positive long-term view of NVIDIA's AI and semiconductor story.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 240 Monday” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Might see new highs monday..” — The item is a price prediction without a stated fundamental or attributed opinion to score.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA green in the 24 hrs market” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “The only other comparable radar on the market at the moment, and already on the Hyperion 10 ecosystem is Arbe's 48x48 AI-Ready Radar which was tested by multiple German OEMs in Germany on 100+ vehicles during 2025” — The author presents Arbe's radar as the only comparable alternative to Mobileye in a potential Wayve/NVIDIA robotaxi integration.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Semiconductors keep on trucking” — The post presents a positive attributed view of the semiconductor sector, which includes NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “THIS POS SHOULD BE 280 BY NOW !!!” — The post asserts a strongly bullish forward price target for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$758 to $772 was fun.” — The item reports a historical share-price range without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “BIG DAY FOR THE BOYS TOMORROW!! GAPPING UP!” — The item is a bullish prediction about a group of semiconductor peers' price movement, not a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “the buy back shares should make this skyrocket!” — The post expresses a strongly bullish attributed opinion that the company's share repurchase will drive substantial share-price gains.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I’m watching inventory and channel checks” — The author observes inventory and channel conditions but offers no directional conclusion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Could see new highs next week” — The item is a price-target observation about a potential future high, which is neutral under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “whether growth expectations can keep outrunning valuation” — The item poses an unresolved question about NVDA's growth versus valuation rather than stating a directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I expect to hear more about Wayve's Gen 3 hardware, based on $NVDA Thor... and providing L3/L4 capable sensor suite” — The item is a forward expectation about Wayve's hardware rather than a scorable proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “A marriage for the ages.” — The item is a generic, non-specific endorsement of an alleged partnership without stating what the partnership is or how it affects NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Black Monday coming boys and girls” — The item is a generic market prediction without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “following the Q3 delivery beat” — The delivery beat is a positive quarterly operating result for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “let's hope she opens at 233” — The item is a price-level expectation for NVIDIA, which is a neutral observation and not a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Still HOLDING $NVDA 5561.661 shares at an average DCA of $4.16/share” — The post states a continuing shareholding position but provides no directional fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Give me 250 this week babe!” — The item is a price target request rather than a substantive fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SNDK $MU $NVDA $NBIS $SPCX” — The post lists several companies without providing any substantive proposition about any one of them.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “just grind it up 📈” — The item describes only a neutral share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “NVDA is miles and miles and miles ahead of all the wannabe ideas on Ai chips.” — The author presents an explicit attributed opinion that NVIDIA holds a substantial competitive lead in AI chips.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this is up 20%+” — The item reports only a share-price move, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$NVDA puts are the only play” — The post expresses a strongly bearish social opinion by identifying puts as the only viable trade.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA hit an all-time high Friday” — The all-time high is a reported price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “a $150B buyback boost” — The disclosed buyback is a positive capital-return and liquidity proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$275 tomo.” — The item is a price prediction without a stated fundamental or attributed opinion to score.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “a bunch of bulls out” — The post characterizes a substantial bullish sentiment around NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 235 on hyper liquid” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Less than 4 hrs til pump wk starts!!!” — The post asserts an imminent multi-day bullish market move.
stocktwits
+0.75 [social_text] “Q3 guide: ~$108B” — The third-quarter revenue guidance is a strong positive forward estimate.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Looking for a huge day Monday. New ATHs all week.” — The item reports anticipated share-price movement and a new high, which is explicitly price-blind.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “get ready for a face ripping week” — The item is a generic bullish prediction about share-price movement, which is not scorable sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Stocks that break through 52 week highs continue to break new records highs.” — The item reports a historical price record without stating a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$BTC.X $ETH.X $SOL.X $META $NVDA” — The item lists NVDA only as part of a generic multi-stock ticker string without any company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “they also have a partnership with Nvidia” — The item asserts a partnership but provides no substantive positive or negative company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “nvidia started a project just for cyber security of open source” — The item reports a Nvidia project but provides no stated benefit or risk to Nvidia.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “QBTS going to be in that number.” — The author's statement is an attributed forward opinion that QBTS will reach Nvidia's price level.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “those 24 hour nvda stocks available yet at robin's hood..?..today?” — The post is a neutral availability question about NVDA shares and contains no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA pullback to 230 tomorrow” — The item reports only a price movement without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA hyper liquids right at 235 with some volume kicking in…” — The item reports only a price level and volume reaction, which is a neutral observation under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 5090’s going for over $6500 on EBay right now.” — The reported share price is a neutral observation and does not constitute a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [news] “Nvidia, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and CrowdStrike surged to 52-week highs last week amid broader sector tailwinds and Wall Street optimism.”
— The item reports only a share-price high and broader market optimism, which are neutral observations under the price-blind policy.Why Did NVDA, HPE, CRWD Stocks Rise To 52-Week Highs Last Week? -0.40 [social_text] “$NVDA short every pop kinda day shaping up” — The attributed observation that short interest tends to act against NVDA's upward moves is a negative attributed trading thesis.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$QQQ $NVDA $INTC $SPY” — The item lists NVDA as a component of the QQQ index without providing any substantive company-specific sentiment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA Nvidia Stock Price Prediction 2026, 2030, 2040” — The item is only a headline about a forward price prediction; no stated fundamental or attributed opinion is provided.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$DJT $SPY $NVDA $NDAQ ...” — The item is a bare mention of NVDA alongside other tickers without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “government going to smack nvidia for letting all the tech data leak to China” — The attributed government action implies a severe regulatory penalty for alleged data leakage.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA poooots!” — The item is only a bare, enthusiastic price observation with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “they dont wanna pay you” — The post asserts that NVIDIA is unwilling to provide adequate compensation to its shareholders.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “NVDA, HPE, CRWD Stocks Rise To 52-Week Highs” — The item reports a historical share-price high without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 235 call going work tomorrow” — The post speculates about a call option without stating a fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “everybody should block him” — The post is a personal call to action about blocking someone rather than a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The Nasdaq hit a new high, led by chip stocks” — The Nasdaq high is a reported market performance observation with no stated fundamental reason for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “everyone block this loser spreading fake shit” — The post is a generic call to block a user and does not state a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 250 TODAY” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$240+” — The item reports only a share-price level without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the dump today” — The item reports only a share-price decline without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Institutional investors are becoming dangerous.” — The attributed thesis characterizes institutional investors as dangerous, a strongly negative forward opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SMCI AT $NVDA’S LEVELS?” — The item raises a neutral comparison between two companies without a substantive judgment about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “anyone else watching smaller AI names too?” — The post is a general question about attention to smaller AI names rather than a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “anyone else watching smaller AI names too?” — The question is about other AI names, not about NVIDIA's fundamentals or prospects.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “anyone else watching smaller AI names too?” — The post is a general question about investor attention to smaller AI names rather than a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Lets destroy burry” — The post expresses a bullish sentiment toward NVIDIA but provides no company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion to score.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “I am here with you winners of the NVDA type all day” — The author expresses a strongly positive, albeit subjective, view of Nvidia as a long-term winner.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “anyone else watching smaller AI names too?” — The post is a general question about investor attention to smaller AI names rather than a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “anyone else watching smaller AI names too?” — The post asks whether others are following smaller AI names, which is a neutral observation of investor attention rather than a scorable proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA Steve Chiavarone! On Bloomberg.” — The item is a neutral mention of NVDA in a Bloomberg interview, without a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$MU Down Continues Down” — The item reports a continuing share-price decline for Micron without a scorable company-specific reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “anyone else watching smaller AI names too?” — The post raises a neutral observation about investor attention to smaller AI names without a specific company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Give us new highs please!” — The item is a price-blind request for further share-price movement rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Love this name a lot!” — The post expresses a strongly favorable attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$INTC $NVDA $PLTR $SNDK” — The item is a bare multi-symbol mention without a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “And if foundry deal done we will see 200+” — The author presents a completed foundry deal as a bullish catalyst for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Nvidia’s $235 Billion Buyback” — The item presents Nvidia's large buyback program as a positive corporate action.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “anyone else watching smaller AI names too?” — The post raises a neutral observation about attention to smaller AI names without a company-specific directional proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “anyone else watching smaller AI names too?” — The post is a general question about attention to smaller AI names rather than a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “anyone else watching smaller AI names too?” — The post raises a neutral observation about investor attention to smaller AI names without a specific company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “anyone else watching smaller AI names too?” — The post is a general question about attention to smaller AI names rather than a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Solid range here to consolidate” — The item describes only a neutral price consolidation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “anyone else watching smaller AI names too?” — The post raises a neutral observation about investor attention to smaller AI names without a specific company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA $300 soon.” — The item is a price target prediction, but the only substantive proposition is a share-price move, which is neutral under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “they’re clearly spamming us.” — The post reports spam activity on the platform rather than a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “anyone else watching smaller AI names too?” — The question is a neutral observation of investor attention rather than a scorable proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “anyone else watching smaller AI names too?” — The post is a general observation about investor attention to smaller AI names rather than a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “increasing it's buyback” — The author presents the expanded buyback as a positive capital-return action for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Looking strong this morning” — The item reports only a positive share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “NVIDIA Holds Steady” — The item reports NVIDIA's share-price movement without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “As long as $NVDA and $SOXL $FNGU stocks continue to recover from September lows it” — The item reports NVDA's recovery from a prior low without stating a directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA just going to dump after brief pump at open” — The post forecasts a near-term share-price decline following the open.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “that volume on Friday was incredible” — The item reports a neutral trading-volume observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA Yields soaring” — The item reports a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this isnt running” — The item is a price-blind observation of share momentum with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$AMD already at ATH, $NVDA already at ATH” — The item reports that NVIDIA has reached an all-time high, which is a price observation and therefore neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 1st green candle hopefully break $240 !” — The item is a bullish price prediction, but the only substantive proposition is the reported price movement itself, which is neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “This has been pretty predictable the last couple weeks.” — The item states a neutral observation about recent predictability without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “NVDA is extended.” — The item reports only a price extension without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “enjoy the run” — The item is a price-blind observation of a reported run without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA and dump lol” — The item is only a price-related observation with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA bREAKOUT!!!” — The item reports only a price breakout without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA tagged a fresh high near 238 Friday and closed at 233.95, only about 7% above its rising 50-day. Not extended, still in a clear uptrend.” — The item describes only technical price behavior and trend without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “@vegas2ny4 People like you said that about Sandisk a year ago as well...LOL. $NVDA” — The post is a generic social remark that mentions NVDA without a substantive company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA Stock is up 26% YTD” — The item reports only a historical share-price move, which is explicitly neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 200$ back” — The item reports only a share-price observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “it will fall eventually, and real hard it always does.” — The item presents a strongly bearish attributed forecast of future NVIDIA share price.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Sub sub $230 tomorror” — The item expresses a strongly bullish attributed price target for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 250 next” — The item is a bare price-target-style observation without a stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Just do it already.” — The item is a substantive but directionless call to action without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA rip my 235 CC” — The post reports a share-price loss but provides no company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion to score.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “It just keeps going up!” — The item reports only a continuing share-price move, which is explicitly price-blind and directionally neutral.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “I wouldn’t be surprised for a 230 dip, I look forward to it . But can we shoot 240 this week?” — The item is a price-blind forecast of share movement without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “i hope this hits $250 before the election.” — The user's hope is a price expectation, not a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA trimming some here. Protecting some gains.” — Trimming and protecting gains are reported trading reactions to price movement, not a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Steak Break!” — The headline is a price-related observation with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 50/50 to hit 248 by End of month” — The item is a speculative forecast of NVIDIA's share price, which is a neutral price observation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “today‘s low 230.80” — The item reports only a share-price observation with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “looks like someone called it yet again” — The post is a price-blind observation of a prior call without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Monsters” — The item is a generic bullish price observation about NVIDIA with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “its going up” — The item reports only a share-price move, which is explicitly neutral under the price-blind policy.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA tsm ath but why would that help nvidia” — The post questions the relevance of TSM's all-time high to Nvidia without stating a substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA $QQQ dump soon” — The item is a price prediction without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA yawn this is stagnant” — The item offers only a neutral observation of share price movement without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA stunning breakout” — The item describes only a reported share-price breakout without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$340✅” — The item reports only a share price level with bullish emoji, which is a price observation and not a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA has 150B buyback program too Paul” — A disclosed $150B buyback program is a material positive capital-return and balance-sheet proposition.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Nvidia’s $20BN licensing deal with Groq faces lawsuit from jilted engineers” — A lawsuit over Nvidia's major Groq licensing agreement creates material legal and execution risk.
stocktwits
+0.00 [news] “This AI giant reached a record high last week.”
— The item reports only a record share-price observation, which is explicitly price-blind and carries no directional sentiment.Nvidia Stock: Buy at the High? +0.00 [social_text] “Nvidia lags again!!!!” — The item reports relative share performance without a scorable fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “QQQ's hitting a new ATH every minute bro” — The item reports only a broad-market index price move, which is neutral under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 200 eow imo” — The item is a price-blind observation of a reported end-of-week share price level with no stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$245” — The item reports only a share price level without a substantive fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “are you going to drop under $236 or go over $237” — The item is a price-level question with no stated fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “this intraday is brutal. Makes you work so hard, no follow thru, choppy and then breaks down” — The item describes NVDA's intraday price behavior without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “AI researcher warns ‘we are racing to build and grow our own adversary’ in NYC hearing” — The item reports a hearing and a general warning about AI competition without stating a company-specific proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA in each cat bounce it leaves more bag holders.” — The item describes only a reported share-price bounce without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA double top” — A double top is a technical price pattern and therefore a neutral price observation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA Too far from the 9 EMA.” — The item describes a technical trading observation without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Blown away by the Q2 earnings beat ($96B revenue vs $92B expected, and $2.22 EPS!)” — Revenue and EPS both materially exceeded expectations.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA new start at 230.80” — The item reports only a new price level for NVIDIA, which is a neutral observation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “try again tomorrow” — The item is a price-blind observation of a future trading attempt rather than a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Apple has billions of customers. NVDA has like 12.” — The comparison implies NVIDIA faces material customer-concentration risk relative to Apple.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$BTC.X needs to catch $SPY $QQQ $NVDA ATH” — The post is a generic market observation about index membership and does not state a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Credit spreads just hit 100-day highs and crossed above their 50-day average in Oct 2026.” — The item reports a broad credit-spread observation without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPY $QQQ $NVDA $SOXX $SOXL” — The item lists NVDA alongside broad and sector indices without any company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “China just got stop shipping to us and watch it fall being they control 96% of all.” — The item presents China's rare-earth dominance as a major supply risk for U.S. AI self-sufficiency.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “google $GOOGL will destroy nvidia value proposition” — The attributed thesis asserts Google will destroy Nvidia's value proposition, a strongly negative competitive claim.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] ““locked in sales” and variable interest entities (SPVs) worked out so well last time right?” — The post questions whether NVDA's prior consolidation and sales-locking strategy will succeed again.
stocktwits
-0.70 [news] “Nvidia's inventory turnover dropped to a multi-year low at 3.35x, with ongoing pressure from memory and substrate wafer constraints.”
— Falling turnover and ongoing component constraints indicate weakening inventory absorption and supply pressure.Nvidia: Inventory Doesn't Lie And Says Downgrade -0.60 [social_text] “$AMD $WDC $MU etc have trounced it” — The author argues that NVIDIA has underperformed several peers over the same period.
stocktwits
-0.50 [social_text] “Many state and local races have halting of data centers from being built as a key issue.” — State and local elections present a potential regulatory barrier to data-center construction.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Attack on Hormuz again as per Iran. this is still not good.” — The post characterizes repeated Hormuz attack threats as a continuing negative geopolitical development.
stocktwits
-0.50 [social_text] “Attack on Hormuz again as per Iran. this is still not good.” — The post characterizes repeated Hormuz attack threats as a continuing negative geopolitical development.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Attack on Hormuz again as per Iran.” — The post mentions a geopolitical event but provides no company-specific impact for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Attack on Hormuz again as per Iran.” — The post reports a geopolitical event but provides no company-specific impact for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Attack on Hormuz again as per Iran.” — The post reports a geopolitical event but provides no company-specific impact for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPY $QQQ $TQQQ $SOXL $NVDA” — The item lists NVDA alongside broad and sector ETFs without any company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “actual price is cheap” — The user's assertion that the actual price is cheap is a positive attributed valuation opinion.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “valued 5x more richly despite doing it at 10x smaller scale” — The attributed comparison implies AMD is materially overvalued relative to its scale.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Pentagon Prepares 'Options' For Trump To Strike Iran Before Midterms” — Preparations for a potential U.S. strike on Iran indicate elevated geopolitical risk for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Fed Puts Broader Economy At Risk As Core #Inflation Moderates” — The item presents a broad macroeconomic risk thesis without a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “Military ordered to be ready for possible Iran strikes as Trump weighs timing” — Possible Iran strikes are a broad geopolitical risk that could materially affect equity markets.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “most of your results are still being driven by the same handful of mega-cap stocks” — The item warns that SCHG's results remain dominated by a small group of mega-cap stocks.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “The ass clown Felon 47 is trying to usher in another Great Depression, the Great Trumpression Hyperinflation Famine Depression.” — The post attributes severe macroeconomic and geopolitical risk to a political figure's actions.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “This is actaully worse becuse it now draws things out even longer & everyone knows he just wanted to move Markets today” — The author argues the political event prolongs uncertainty and was intended to manipulate markets, a negative attributed view.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Trump said no IRAN strikes.” — The absence of reported Iran strikes is a bullish geopolitical development for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Trump said no IRAN strikes......” — The item reports a geopolitical development but provides no company-specific impact for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA NO IRAN strikes as per Trump” — The item is a bare geopolitical assertion about Iran that does not establish a specific material impact on NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Vera Rubin is ramping up” — The stated ramp-up of Vera Rubin is a positive product-development proposition.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “2028 guidance is at 70% growth” — The attributed 70% growth guidance is a strong positive forward fundamental.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPY $DJT $NVDA ...” — The item lists NVDA as a component of the S&P 500 without providing a substantive company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “seeing a well-defined breakout fade can be a red flag” — The author treats the fading breakout as a bearish technical signal.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “#Dow Holds Steady As #Nasdaq Falls 1.24% On #AI #Stocks” — The item reports Nasdaq index movement without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “A Potential S&P 500 Double Top” — The potential double-top is a market-wide technical pattern, not a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Microsoft just got called a fraudulent company by the whitehouse. For hiring foreigners over americans.” — The post alleges serious misconduct and government scrutiny against Microsoft, creating a negative company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
OpenAI revenue allegation (61) +0.15
+0.00 [social_text] “Jensen's chest seemingly busting out a half an inch” — The item offers only a neutral physical observation about Jensen Huang with no substantive company proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “now it is called SI = Super Intellegence” — The item is a neutral observation about a name change with no scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “NVDA at double top, watch area” — The double-top pattern is a technical observation without a stated fundamental or directional opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA” — The item contains only a bare mention of NVIDIA with no substantive proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$OKLO $SPY $NVDA $MU $SPCX” — The item is a bare list of tickers with no substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.50 [social_text] “Netlist targets Micron’s AI infrastructure at ITC as lawmaker scrutiny lingers” — Micron faces a targeted ITC proceeding and ongoing legislative scrutiny over its AI infrastructure.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “Micron continues to import or sell for importation billions of dollars’ worth of infringing products into the United States.” — The source characterizes Micron's import and sale of infringing products as extraordinarily lucrative and ongoing.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “is this where memory is going?” — The post speculates about memory-sector direction without stating a substantive NVIDIA proposition.
stocktwits
-0.90 [social_text] “Their 2027 roadmap explicitly says they will hit 800 logical qubits and right now they still have 0 logical qubits.” — The author asserts a severe gap between IonQ's stated roadmap and its current lack of logical qubits.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “NVTS Stock In Spotlight Today Following Microchip Collaboration” — The item reports a collaboration involving NVTS but provides no company-specific positive or negative judgment.
stocktwits
-0.50 [social_text] “Nvidia’s $20 billion Groq deal faces lawsuit alleging startup’s stockholders were shortchanged” — A lawsuit challenging the Groq deal's fairness presents a material legal risk to Nvidia.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Rumble just acquired 9 data centers, 22k $NVDA GPUs, 300k CPUs and 200 Megawatts of currently unmonetized power access.” — The acquisition is a substantial company observation, but the text provides no stated benefit or cost to Rumble.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPACEX” — The item is only a bare mention of SpaceX and contains no substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Marvell CEO Says $30B Custom Chip Target Is ‘Not a Stretch’” — The CEO's assessment that the $30B target is achievable is a positive attributed opinion on Marvell's custom-chip opportunity.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Is $PLTR going to do $NVDA SaaS like replacing $MSFT at $DELL ???” — The item poses a hypothetical comparison between companies rather than stating a concrete proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Cerebras has the best of the best technology for today and tomorrow!” — The post makes an explicitly favorable forward assessment of Cerebras's technology.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Data center demand shows no slowing.” — The item states that data center demand remains strong, a positive demand proposition for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “RTX Spark devices powered by NVIDIA chips will begin shipping next week” — Upcoming shipment of RTX Spark devices powered by NVIDIA chips is a positive product-market development.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The first Nvidia RTX Spark laptops cost up to $7,000” — The item reports a product price without stating whether it is favorable or unfavorable for Nvidia.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Nvidia is still the core bottleneck.” — Being the core bottleneck indicates strong and sustained demand for Nvidia's compute hardware.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “SemiAnalysis Flags Issues With Legacy British Columbia Data Centers” — The analysis identifies operational problems with IREN's legacy data centers, a negative operational proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The first Nvidia RTX Spark laptops cost up to $7,000” — The item reports a product price without stating whether it is favorable or unfavorable for Nvidia.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Seems like a no brainer to be heavily positioned in both wolf and $NVDA ’s right hand man Navitas” — The author presents a strongly bullish investment thesis for Navitas as a key AI semiconductor opportunity.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “TSMC posted Q3 2026 revenue of NT$1.49 trillion, beating the expected NT$1.46 trillion, thanks to strong September sales and high chip demand.” — TSMC beat revenue expectations on strong sales and high demand.
stocktwits
+0.60 [news] “the new Surface Laptop Ultra and all the new Windows-based PCs running the RTX Spark chip mark the dawn of the agentic PC area.”
— Nvidia's RTX Spark chip is presented as enabling a new agentic PC platform, indicating positive expansion of its addressable market.Microsoft And Nvidia Look To Reinvent The PC For The Agentic Era -0.60 [social_text] “Its not being bought for valuation its being bought to hide out in & that just means more Selling pressure sooner than later” — The attributed thesis characterizes Apple's demand as non-valuation-driven and anticipates additional selling pressure.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Western Digital is approaching a critical technical support zone, and a potential rebound could be setting up!” — The item presents a bullish technical setup for Western Digital, including support levels and potential rebound targets.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA pledged $1 billion to boost U.S. scientific research over the next five years.” — Nvidia's multi-year, multi-billion-dollar pledge to support U.S. scientific research is a substantial positive commitment.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “elon-musks-spacex-could-become-nvidias-biggest-customer” — The item presents a speculative possibility of a major customer relationship without stating whether it is likely or unlikely.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Rumble just acquired 9 data centers, 22k $NVDA GPUs, 300k CPUs and 200 Megawatts of currently unmonetized power access.” — The acquisition is a neutral company observation; the attributed valuation is about Rumble, not NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.80 [news] “Nvidia is positioned for outsized growth through 2027, driven by robust AI demand signals from supply chain and cloud partners.”
— The item presents a strong forward-looking thesis that Nvidia's growth will be driven by robust AI demand.Nvidia: Micron Just Gave It Away +0.60 [social_text] “NVIDIA is committing $1 billion over the next five years to help U.S. scientists advance research in quantum computing, healthcare, and energy.” — Nvidia's multi-year, multi-billion-dollar commitment to advance research across several scientific domains is a material positive investment proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [news] “Nvidia Corporation has positioned itself as a finance resource for AI data center growth.”
— The item states a neutral company positioning without a scorable fundamental outcome or attributed opinion.Nvidia: AI's Lender Of Last Resort +0.60 [social_text] “this openAI article is just fear mongering from a tweak in revenue breakdown” — The user rejects the article's revenue-breakdown interpretation as fear-mongering, implying a more favorable view of OpenAI.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “OpenAI is doomed to fail with so many competitors.” — The attributed thesis predicts OpenAI's failure due to competition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Open AI’s revenue is up.” — The item reports a positive revenue development for OpenAI, which is the only substantive company proposition in the item.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “they dont want the world to see how unprofitable they are” — The attributed view that OpenAI and Anthropic are unprofitable is a negative fundamental proposition.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “OpenAI’s actual annualized revenue run rate was closer to ~$30B in July and approaching ~$50B by the end of September — meaning revenue grew 70%+ in roughly one quarter.” — The item presents strong evidence that OpenAI's revenue grew substantially over a quarter.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “OpenAI’s $70B vs $50B drama? Investors calculated the higher figure by including AI sales through cloud partners.” — The item discusses OpenAI's revenue measurement but does not provide a company-specific sentiment proposition.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Its growing massively and will continue to grow!” — The item asserts massive and continuing growth in OpenAI revenue, a strongly positive attributed company proposition.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “Altman is not viewed as a trustworthy CEO. suffice it to say that if you are planning the invasion of Iran, you wouldnt want to put Altman in charge.” — The attributed view that OpenAI's CEO is untrustworthy is a strongly negative leadership opinion.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “IREN secured a 9.7 billion, 5-year AI cloud contract with Microsoft to deploy Nvidia AI chip architectures” — The multi-year, multi-billion-dollar Microsoft contract validates IREN's AI infrastructure transition.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “OpenAI with Twenty Billion dollars in missing revenue” — The post asserts a large, undisclosed revenue shortfall for OpenAI, which is presented as a negative proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “OpenAI vs Anthropic - How much more money do they need?” — The item discusses OpenAI and Anthropic's funding needs without stating a company-specific proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “OpenAI Fake news … Shoot first, ask quest questions later” — The item asserts OpenAI's content is fabricated and accuses it of acting without due process.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “our top portfolio holding is in the exact right spot” — The author presents a strongly bullish thesis that a specific networking company is positioned for the emerging physical AI opportunity.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “creating disturbing news such as a $20 billion shot of "extimated" OpenAI's revenue” — The author characterizes a large downward revision to OpenAI's revenue as disturbing negative news.
stocktwits
short positioning (44) +0.20
+0.00 [social_text] “Max Pain for options expiring today is 227.50.” — The maximum pain level is a neutral options-market observation without a stated directional implication for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Opened 500 $NVDA 240C 10/05 @ $0.27 (Actual Cost: $0.27)” — The item reports a single options position without any stated fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “was expecting a little bigger pull back maybe later for the option kill” — The post anticipates a further pullback driven by options expiration, presenting a bearish technical expectation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “October 9, 2026: ~328.4 million shares unlock.
• 🗓 October 24, 2026: ~328.4 million shares unlock.” — The stated unlock dates are a neutral company fact without a directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “Just keep accumulating shares and keep winning :)” — The post advocates a long-term accumulation strategy as a winning approach.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA 77k 240$ calls expire this Friday.” — The expiration of a specific options contract is a neutral company observation.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “large call walls at 240, 242.5, and 245. Put wall (support) at 235, which was previous resistance from enormous call wall.” — The item describes option-level support and resistance without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$235 Billions available for Buybacks” — The post identifies very large remaining buyback capacity as a positive capital-return proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “MSFT to begin using $NVDA Ai chip in surface laptops.” — Microsoft's adoption of an NVIDIA chip is a neutral company observation without a stated positive or negative impact.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “AMD’s Lisa Su Visits South Korea, Reportedly Discusses AI Collaboration With Samsung, SK Hynix” — The item reports a collaboration discussion involving AMD but does not state a substantive outcome or direction for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [news] “Microsoft (MSFT) and Nvidia (NVDA) revealed their new AI laptop — the Surface Laptop Ultra — capable of running AI agents directly on the device rather than relying on the cloud.”
— The new AI laptop demonstrates demand for Nvidia chips in a new form factor and use case.Microsoft unveils new AI laptop powered by Nvidia chips +0.70 [news] “SpaceXAI plans to more than double debt for more of Nvidia’s chips.”
— SpaceXAI's plan to substantially increase its chip purchases indicates expanded demand for Nvidia's products.The Richest Man in the World Needs More Money +0.00 [social_text] “going to require alot of memory for this.” — The post mentions memory requirements but provides no company-specific direction or conclusion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “It continues to be a AI Infrastructure debt boom dominated market” — The item characterizes AI infrastructure as a dominant market driver, a positive attributed view of demand.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “TSM gives its monthly revs update around 1:30am EST tomorrow” — The item reports a scheduled TSM revenue update without stating a directional outcome or company-specific judgment.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “theres a dip possible with opex” — The user suggests a possible operating-expense dip, which is a negative operating proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Microsoft claims 4.3x faster AI image generation and 6.2x faster video generation vs MacBook Pro (M5 Pro)” — Microsoft's stated performance claims for the Surface laptop are a positive attributed product proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “microsoft-releases-new-nvidia-chip-ai-pcs” — The item reports a Microsoft product launch that mentions NVIDIA but does not provide a substantive company-specific proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “revenue going up more than $200 million more than analyst estimates” — The item presents a strong positive attributed opinion that NVIDIA's revenue substantially exceeded analyst expectations.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “Samsung had a slight miss on their preliminary earnings estimates” — Samsung's preliminary earnings miss is a negative operating result.
stocktwits
-0.75 [social_text] “the economics supporting that exponential growth are becoming increasingly difficult to sustain or justify.” — The item argues that the financial economics supporting AI's exponential growth are becoming hard to sustain.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “Physical AI aka Robots can always do 81% of jobs!” — The attributed claim that robots can automate the vast majority of jobs is a strongly bullish proposition for NVIDIA's AI hardware demand.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “The 4 largest options bets on index names today” — The item reports options activity for multiple index names without providing a company-specific directional proposition.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “it’s won’t be profitable for the companies buying this compute so big problem here” — The attributed thesis is that companies purchasing the compute will not be profitable, a negative forward fundamental view.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “The current demand could represent merely a fraction of what's coming over the next five to ten years.” — The item forecasts substantially higher future demand for the computing and data-center infrastructure that NVIDIA supplies.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “both Samsung and TSM gave kick-ass revs update early this morning.” — The author characterizes Samsung's revenue update as strongly positive.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “Teradata's Chief Operating Officer Dumps Over 48,000 Shares Worth $1.4 Million plus” — The COO's large share sale is a negative attributed signal about Teradata's outlook.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA gonna try calls here again 232.5 tomorrow exp.” — The post is a speculative call-trade observation rather than a substantive fundamental or attributed opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Samsung’s earnings too which were bigger than nvda’s earnings by the way” — The comparison is a neutral company observation without a stated directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “ai related stocks such as $NVDA $INTC $SKHY are short the bounces” — The attributed observation that AI-related stocks are short bounces presents a negative attributed technical view on NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “this $NVDA $INTC short is beyond good” — The user's attributed opinion that the short thesis is 'beyond good' is a positive forward judgment on the short case.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “$QXO in 5 years this will have a better return than $NVDA” — The attributed comparison forecasts a worse five-year return for NVIDIA relative to another company.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$PLTR goes 2X with $NVDA takin out $AAPL ???” — The item is speculative comparison of relative performance without a stated fundamental reason for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “I would not day trade any Short plays right now, the play is to swing any Short.” — The author advances a forward-looking trading thesis that shorting NVIDIA is preferable as a swing rather than a day trade.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “buy the dip” — The post expresses a bullish attributed opinion that the current price level is a buying opportunity.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA bought more spreads in Nvda selling the 235 puts two weeks away.” — The described options activity is a neutral observation without a stated directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
bullish analyst opinion (24) +0.33
-0.60 [social_text] “I am not bullish” — The author explicitly states a bearish opinion on NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Hold. $300 by the EOY” — The author's bullish target is an attributed forward opinion on NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Still bullish, still rating pretty high on my model.” — The author's bullish rating and high model assessment are a positive attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “There are so many buyers for NVDA” — The post expresses a strongly bullish attributed opinion about NVIDIA's buyer demand.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “bulls toast” — The post expresses bullish social sentiment toward NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “More down side ahead, with a retest at 30400.” — The item is a general technical market forecast that does not state a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “MONTHS to climb to $240 gone in 2 days.” — The item reports a rapid share-price decline without a stated fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Full recovery tomorrow.” — The item is a price-recovery prediction with no stated fundamental reason for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “how low” — The post expresses confusion about NVIDIA's share price but states no directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.40 [social_text] “Bulls rn” — The post expresses bullish sentiment toward NVIDIA, though the signal is brief and unelaborated.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$SPY $QQQ $NVDA $AMD $20 billion miss.” — The item is a bare market-basket mention without a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Tesla fully recovers but this pos doesn’t” — The item reports Tesla's recovery and a negative price move for NVIDIA, but the move itself is neutral under the price-blind rule.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA NASDAQ 1% off all time highs Nvda 5% off all time highs” — The item reports only share-price observations without a scorable fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “started this big sell off” — The post describes a reported sell-off without stating a company-specific fundamental reason.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “tank to $220 then pump” — The user's attributed thesis is that Nvidia will first fall and then rally to $220.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “$NVDA no worries 250 next week” — The author's bullish comment and implied target constitute a positive attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “nothing will help this stock” — The user expresses a strongly bullish view that no further help is needed for the stock.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “we’re still heading higher” — The bullish outlook is a general market proposition, not a company-specific proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.80 [social_text] “we believe the CPU TAM expands from $29B in 2025 to $300B in 2030, or a 60% CAGR.” — Citi's attributed thesis describes a very large multi-year expansion in the CPU total addressable market.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “hope you bought calls!!” — The user's call-purchase hope is a bullish attributed opinion on NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “many artificial excuses for the mkt to pull back is all” — The item speculates about market pullbacks without stating a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “Once we break $236, skies the limit” — The post expresses a strongly bullish technical view contingent on breaking a specified price level.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “been hearing this bullshit for at least a year.” — The user dismisses a year of bullish claims as false, expressing a negative attributed opinion on the bullish thesis.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Buy the dip” — The user's 'buy the dip' comment is a bullish attributed trading opinion on NVIDIA.
stocktwits
bear trap thesis (12) -0.46
-0.60 [social_text] “yesterday bears shorted Nvidia” — The item presents a bearish attributed thesis that bears shorted Nvidia.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “$NVDA bear trap” — The post asserts a bearish trap thesis about NVIDIA, but the claim is extremely brief and lacks supporting evidence.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “dam they selling this to by scandisk. Big dumpy incoming” — The post advances a bearish thesis that NVIDIA is being sold to Scandisk and that a large price decline is imminent.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA being controlled by the option Gods” — The attributed thesis describes an option-market dynamic without a stated fundamental direction for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA easy short at these levels” — The post presents a bearish attributed opinion that NVIDIA is easily shortable at the stated levels.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “If market priced $MU with an AI appropriate P/E ratio it would be $3000+ right now.” — The author's valuation thesis implies Nvidia's current multiple is appropriate for AI demand.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “I expect an apology to SRX management from Jensen.” — The author's expectation of an apology is a strongly negative attributed opinion about Nvidia's conduct.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$NLST we should go after $NVDA, they have money” — The attributed short thesis claims NVIDIA is overvalued because it holds excess cash.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Vanguard and Blackrock can single handily destroy him anytime they want.” — The attributed argument that large institutions could easily defeat Michael Burry's short positions is a negative forward opinion about the viability of those shorts.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “shorting $NVDA again it has hart time moving up” — The user's repeated short thesis asserts that NVIDIA faces persistent difficulty moving higher.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “yeah short it easy money” — The post presents an attributed bearish opinion that shorting NVIDIA is straightforward.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA easy short” — The post expresses a strongly bearish attributed opinion that NVIDIA is easy to short.
stocktwits
capitalization resilience (10) +0.09
+0.60 [social_text] “The U.S. government plans to provide Vistra roughly $4.2 billion in loans to increase output at its nuclear fleet” — A reported government plan to expand Vistra's nuclear generation is a positive development for the company.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$OKLO $NVDA $SPY” — The item is a bare mention of NVDA alongside other tickers without a substantive company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “The companies well funded with cash, can thrive in any market.” — The attributed thesis is that NVIDIA's strong cash position enables resilience across market conditions.
stocktwits
-0.50 [social_text] “$NVDA can’t really go on a sustainable run without money coming out of other names.” — The attributed thesis says NVDA's sustained run depends on draining other names, implying a structural constraint.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “All $NVDA $AMD chips are paperweight if we don't have power to run them.” — The attributed thesis argues that NVIDIA's chips are ineffective without adequate power infrastructure.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “the perils of being overweight tech” — The author identifies concentration in technology as a material source of portfolio drawdown risk.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Adds today” — The item is a neutral observation that the user added NVDA to their portfolio, which carries no directional sentiment about the company.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA necessary sector rotation” — The item characterizes NVDA's role in a sector rotation without stating a directional fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA has a better balance sheet than the $40 trillion in govt debt” — The comparison asserts that NVIDIA's balance sheet is stronger than the government's, a positive attributed financial opinion.
stocktwits
worker compensation and tax policy (9) -0.19
+0.60 [social_text] “$NVDA jobs report perfect” — The user characterizes NVIDIA's jobs report as perfect, a positive employment outcome.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$MU Bad News With Jobs Report $QQQ” — The item reports a market-wide jobs report without providing company-specific information about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA $ORCL
https://www.thelattehq.com/p/the-weak-jobs-report-wall-street-wanted” — The item is a bare NVDA mention paired with a general jobs-report link and contains no company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Soft Jobs Just Rewired How Stocks Read The Labor Market” — The headline is a general market thesis about labor-market interpretation and does not state a company-specific proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Inflation is still very high, gas price high.” — The post presents persistent inflation and high gasoline prices as a negative economic condition.
stocktwits
-0.40 [social_text] “Inflation is still very high, gas price high.” — The user presents persistent inflation and high gasoline prices as an unresolved adverse economic condition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “the delta is just attributable to accounting (not true economic) differences” — The user's accounting-versus-economic observation is a neutral company observation and does not establish a directional fundamental proposition.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Nvidia is still not complying.” — The item asserts Nvidia is failing to comply with a stated political directive, presenting a negative compliance proposition.
stocktwits
AI trade decline (6) +0.27
+0.80 [social_text] “Companies and governments still can’t get enough GPUs and CPUs” — The item states sustained strong demand for NVIDIA's GPUs and CPUs.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “the now infamously “margin called” and closed down “Situational Unawareness” 24 yearold wonder kid Leopold Ashenbrenner who was betting on with 4x leverage the full-stack “neocloud” AI data providers, proprietary AI servers, and the NVIDIA GPU data center buildouts.” — The cited thesis that a leveraged investor bet on NVIDIA's data-center buildouts is presented as a failed position, implying negative demand for NVIDIA GPUs.
stocktwits
+0.70 [social_text] “AI demand is very strong.” — The item states a strong attributed view on AI demand, which is a positive fundamental proposition.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “open Ai ,Meta,google,Amazon,Microsoft, Elon , Anthropic will keep buying chips until one of them wins best in AI” — The attributed thesis is that major AI companies will sustain strong chip demand until a clear market winner emerges.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “the drop of the ai trade” — The item attributes a decline to the AI trade, which is a negative proposition about NVIDIA's primary growth area.
stocktwits
trading difficulty (6) +0.00
+0.00 [social_text] “Is it $NVDA or $SPACX for long term hold?” — The post poses a neutral long-term holding choice between two companies without stating a substantive opinion on either.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Another solid session inside the VIP channel” — The item reports a successful trading session but provides no substantive proposition about NVIDIA's fundamentals or prospects.
stocktwits
-0.60 [social_text] “Trading this shit is damn near impossible” — The author characterizes trading the mentioned stocks as extremely difficult.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Couple successful trades resulting in +$800” — The user reports a successful trading outcome, which is a positive attributed result.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Black Friday tomorrow” — The post is a generic market observation about an upcoming shopping day with no company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “When you trade with planning and discipline, you can feast.” — The item presents a general trading maxim without a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
alleged fraud (3) -0.37
-0.40 [news] “The accounting fight between Michael Burry and Nvidia just got a very unusual historical reference.”
— The item describes an ongoing accounting dispute involving Nvidia, which is a negative company-specific proposition.Michael Burry pulls an old playbook into the Nvidia fight +0.00 [social_text] “Spacex and Nvidia working with snap!!!” — The item asserts a partnership but provides no evidence that it is real or material to Nvidia.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “$NVDA scam altman” — The post asserts a negative fraud allegation against Nvidia's leadership.
stocktwits
attributed analyst credibility (3) -0.80
-0.70 [social_text] “constantly misrepresenting” — The author makes a strongly negative attributed claim about media outlets' representation.
stocktwits
-0.80 [social_text] “a person like Dan Nathan to continue be on air to try and influence viewers by misrepresenting the truth time and time again” — The author attributes repeated misrepresentation to Dan Nathan's on-air commentary.
stocktwits
-0.90 [social_text] “Jenson has gone downhill fast. Total idiot now.” — The post makes an explicitly negative attributed judgment about Jensen Huang's competence.
stocktwits
future RTX Spark platform expansion (3) +0.60
+0.60 [social_text] “NEAR Protocol was Integrated With Robinhood Crypto Chain” — The Robinhood integration is presented as a positive development for NEAR Protocol.
stocktwits
market-wide unemployment data (3) +0.23
+0.00 [social_text] “jobless claims come in sharply higher” — The item speculates about a broader labor-market data point without stating a company-specific proposition.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “So is the party over?” — The question is a generic market sentiment observation that does not state a substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
Microsoft dependency (3) +0.00
+0.00 [social_text] “microsoft-releases-new-nvidia-chip-ai-pcs” — The item reports a Microsoft product release without stating a company-specific benefit or harm for NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “Microsoft's flat seat model is winning the initial land grab by keeping CFO budgets predictable” — Microsoft's pricing advantage is a neutral observation of market share and budget predictability, not a directional company proposition.
stocktwits
paid promotional account (3) -0.03
+0.00 [social_text] “Paid bot account Oct 2026” — The item identifies a paid promotional account but provides no substantive opinion about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
+0.60 [social_text] “Massive contract with $CRWV is just the beginning” — The item presents a large contract as a positive business opportunity for the company.
stocktwits
-0.70 [social_text] “theres no one on the other end of the phone” — The post asserts that customers cannot reach Nvidia support, indicating a negative service-access proposition.
stocktwits
Terafab project involvement (3) +0.30
-0.40 [social_text] “Intel will remain involved in Musk’s Terafab project despite TSMC talks, but the move has dented investor confidence over Intel’s role.” — The item reports continued Intel involvement in Terafab but explicitly states the move has damaged investor confidence in Intel's role.
stocktwits
Nvidia market attention (2) -0.30
-0.60 [social_text] “I shorted the $QQQ and $NVDA strength and made money.” — The author's successful short thesis is an attributed negative opinion on NVIDIA's strength.
stocktwits
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA” — The mention is incidental and carries no substantive proposition about Nvidia.
stocktwits
call volume reduction (1) +0.00
+0.00 [social_text] “grind those calls down” — The post describes a share-price move without stating a fundamental reason or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
incidental mention (1) +0.00
+0.00 [social_text] “$NVDA” — The mention of NVDA is incidental and carries no substantive proposition about the company.
stocktwits
Jaguar 01 vehicle design (1) +0.00
+0.00 [social_text] “Jaguar 01 is a bit boxy looking” — The design observation is neutral and not a scorable proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
Norway sovereign wealth fund withdrawal (1) +0.00
+0.00 [social_text] “Norway plans to withdraw NOK 608.4 billion ($63.6 billion) from its sovereign wealth fund in 2027.” — The withdrawal is a general sovereign-fund observation that does not state a company-specific proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
OpenAI correction expectation (1) +0.00
+0.00 [social_text] “if the miss isnwrong whybdoeant open ai correct it” — The item questions an expected OpenAI correction but does not state a substantive NVIDIA proposition.
stocktwits
proprietary chip development (1) +0.00
+0.00 [social_text] “Working on proprietary chip $NVDA $PLTR $SNOW” — The item states a neutral development activity without a directional company-specific outcome.
stocktwits
revenue estimate increase (1) +0.70
+0.70 [social_text] “Needham raised its quarterly revenue estimate for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) to $109 billion” — Needham's higher quarterly revenue estimate reflects a positive attributed near-term revenue outlook.
stocktwits
search traffic and SEO relevance (1) +0.00
+0.00 [social_text] “Google classic is still driving way more traffic than “AI” search in Oct 2026 at +23%.” — The item reports Google's traffic growth but does not state a company-specific fundamental or attributed opinion.
stocktwits
Texas governor race (1) +0.00
+0.00 [social_text] “The governor's race in Texas may be decided because the Democratic candidate who is surprisingly leading is anti data centers.” — The item is a Texas-governor political observation with no substantive proposition about NVIDIA.
stocktwits
Sentiment by window
| window | items | top topics (count, mean) |
|---|
| 1d | 0 | — |
| 7d | 1658 | investor sentiment (852, +0.10) technical breakdown risk (268, +0.02) social engagement level (124, +0.09) OpenAI revenue allegation (59, +0.15) |
| 30d | 2373 | investor sentiment (869, +0.11) social engagement level (554, +0.09) technical breakdown risk (447, +0.08) OpenAI revenue allegation (61, +0.15) |
| ytd | 2373 | investor sentiment (869, +0.11) social engagement level (554, +0.09) technical breakdown risk (447, +0.08) OpenAI revenue allegation (61, +0.15) |
Numeric read
Sentiment quality
coverage: social_text 2134 · news 237 · social_engagement 2
Divergence
Price & sentiment aligned
Sentiment by topic
| topic | count | mean score | pos | neg | neutral |
|---|
| investor sentiment | 869 | +0.11 | 248 | 115 | 506 |
| social engagement level | 554 | +0.09 | 142 | 66 | 346 |
| technical breakdown risk | 447 | +0.08 | 111 | 64 | 272 |
| OpenAI revenue allegation | 61 | +0.15 | 28 | 15 | 18 |
| short positioning | 44 | +0.20 | 19 | 8 | 17 |
| bullish analyst opinion | 24 | +0.33 | 13 | 1 | 10 |
| bear trap thesis | 12 | -0.46 | 1 | 10 | 1 |
| capitalization resilience | 10 | +0.09 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
| worker compensation and tax policy | 9 | -0.19 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
| AI trade decline | 6 | +0.27 | 4 | 2 | 0 |
| trading difficulty | 6 | +0.00 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| alleged fraud | 3 | -0.37 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| attributed analyst credibility | 3 | -0.80 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| future RTX Spark platform expansion | 3 | +0.60 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| market-wide unemployment data | 3 | +0.23 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Microsoft dependency | 3 | +0.00 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| paid promotional account | 3 | -0.03 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Terafab project involvement | 3 | +0.30 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Nvidia market attention | 2 | -0.30 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| call volume reduction | 1 | +0.00 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| incidental mention | 1 | +0.00 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Jaguar 01 vehicle design | 1 | +0.00 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Norway sovereign wealth fund withdrawal | 1 | +0.00 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| OpenAI correction expectation | 1 | +0.00 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| proprietary chip development | 1 | +0.00 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| revenue estimate increase | 1 | +0.70 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| search traffic and SEO relevance | 1 | +0.00 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Texas governor race | 1 | +0.00 | 0 | 0 | 1 |